Liberal Forum

As the political firestorm surrounding the late Jeffrey Epstein reignites, a recent report by The Washington Post finds that there is "no public evidence of any wrongdoing on [President Donald] Trump's part."

 Despite that key finding, questions from lawmakers and media figures have dominated headlines in recent weeks about who was really involved with Epstein.

 The newspaper's investigation found no credible allegations tying Trump to any illicit conduct related to Epstein or his trafficking network.

 The Post's findings support Trump's own assertions.

 He has repeatedly stated that he "had a falling out" with Epstein and "was not a fan."

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/washi ... d/1220338/

how long will the democrats continue their incessant nothing burger handwringing...
 

ROG62 » 29 Jul 2025, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:02 am

As the political firestorm surrounding the late Jeffrey Epstein reignites, a recent report by The Washington Post finds that there is "no public evidence of any wrongdoing on [President Donald] Trump's part."

 Despite that key finding, questions from lawmakers and media figures have dominated headlines in recent weeks about who was really involved with Epstein.

 The newspaper's investigation found no credible allegations tying Trump to any illicit conduct related to Epstein or his trafficking network.

 The Post's findings support Trump's own assertions.

 He has repeatedly stated that he "had a falling out" with Epstein and "was not a fan."

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/washi ... d/1220338/

how long will the democrats continue their incessant nothing burger handwringing...
 

 

And another article:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... newsletter
 

I get that you people are stupid, but

the public record

The current furor is over what ISN'T yet public.

Those stoking said furor are NOT only on the left..

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:41 am

I get that you people are stupid, but

the public record

The current furor is over what ISN'T yet public.

Those stoking said furor are NOT only on the left..

 

Right now WAPO is claiming that there is no evidence of wrong doing by trump.  ****, ****, you had Trump convicted of coordinating with Russia well before the Bad Bobby Failure and anything was public.

STFU, Hypocrite Asshole.

PS.  In the future, remember my comment starts with "Right Now...."  We know you edit quotes and lie about what was said, **** ******.

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:44 am

Right now WAPO is claiming that there is no evidence of wrong doing by trump.  

Are these the WaPo words in question?

"no public evidence of any wrongdoing on Trump's part."

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:46 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:44 am

Right now WAPO is claiming that there is no evidence of wrong doing by trump.  

Are these the WaPo words in question?

"no public evidence of any wrongdoing on Trump's part."

 

You tell me.  Take a stand.  Also, I also posted another article from WAPO.  

And remember what I posted, Lying Salem ******.

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:56 am

You tell me.  Take a stand.  

You can't make this **** up...

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:03 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:56 am

 

You can't make this **** up...

 

No, you can not make up a guy like you who on an anonymous forum is so afraid to take a stand, Salem ******. Take a stand and I will answer your questions.

At this time we have a 2 WAPO articles were as of Today they admit there is no evidence Trump did any wrong doing concerning Epstein.

You got something different post it.

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:06 am

No, you can not make up a guy like you 

Tiny,


Me - Evidence

You - Narrative..

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 10:08 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:08 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:06 am

No, you can not make up

Tiny,


Me - Evidence

You - Narrative..

 

You haven't provided any evidence.  Two articles have been provided that state to this point no wrongdoing by trump is present.

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:06 am

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 10:03 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:03 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:56 am

 

You can't make this **** up...


 

No, you can not make up a guy like you who on an anonymous forum is so afraid to take a stand, Salem ******. Take a stand and I will answer your questions.

At this time we have a 2 WAPO articles were as of Today they admit there is no evidence Trump did any wrong doing concerning Epstein.

You got something different post it.

 

And more evidence you edit and delete portions of quotes of others.

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:10 am

You haven't provided any evidence.  Two articles have been provided that state to this point no wrongdoing by trump is present.

And more evidence you edit and delete portions of quotes of others.

You are the stupidest human being alive..

From the OPENING sentence of the OP

As the political firestorm surrounding the late Jeffrey Epstein reignites, a recent report by The Washington Post finds that there is "no public evidence of any wrongdoing on [President Donald] Trump's part."

My question 

Are these the WaPo words in question? "no public evidence of any wrongdoing on Trump's part."
 

 Your "stand"

You tell me.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:36 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:10 am

You haven't provided any evidence.  Two articles have been provided that state to this point no wrongdoing by trump is present.

And more evidence you edit and delete portions of quotes of others.

You are the stupidest human being alive..

From the OPENING sentence of the OP

As the political firestorm surrounding the late Jeffrey Epstein reignites, a recent report by The Washington Post finds that there is "no public evidence of any wrongdoing on [President Donald] Trump's part."

My question 

Are these the WaPo words in question? "no public evidence of any wrongdoing on Trump's part."
 

 Your "stand"

You tell me.

More edits.  Try again, Cowardly Salem ******.  You aint ****.   out quotes in FULL or you lose.
 

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:44 am

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:41 am

I get that you people are stupid, but

the public record

The current furor is over what ISN'T yet public.

Those stoking said furor are NOT only on the left..

Right now WAPO is claiming that there is no evidence of wrong doing by trump.  ****, ****, you had Trump convicted of coordinating with Russia well before the Bad Bobby Failure and anything was public.

STFU, Hypocrite Asshole.

PS.  In the future, remember my comment starts with "Right Now...."  We know you edit quotes and lie about what was said, **** ******.

@Blackvegetable  

Hey, Real Life Cowardly Too Far, my stand is right there.  Stop lying you waste of awhore ****


****** Boy, Your problem is with WAPO who has broken from your talking points, not me, ****** boy.

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:39 am

@Blackvegetable  

Hey, Real Life Cowardly Too Far, my stand is right there.  Stop lying you waste of awhore ****

Right now WAPO is claiming that there is no evidence of wrong doing by trump

This is NOT what "WaPo is claiming".

Which is why I asked you to confirm the WaPo words to which you were referring. 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:42 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:39 am

@Blackvegetable  

Hey, Real Life Cowardly Too Far, my stand is right there.  Stop lying you waste of awhore ****

Right now WAPO is claiming that there is no evidence of wrong doing by trump

This is NOT what "WaPo is claiming".

Which is why I asked you to confirm the WaPo words to which you were referring. 

 

Really:

Trump and Epstein had a relationship, but there’s no evidence of Trump wrongdoing

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... newsletter

Busted you lying cowardly motherfucekr.  You lose.

That was posted earlier.  Told you to read it.

Don't bother me again with your lies.  I do apologize.  I used to say your dad was rolling over in his grave over the cowardly lying spawn his payday **** produced.  BUT, after learning what I have about your fantasy father I would say he was proud of your cowardice things you were a chip off the old block.
 

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:47 am

Really:

Trump and Epstein had a relationship, but there’s no evidence of Trump wrongdoing

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... newsletter

Busted you lying cowardly motherfucekr.  You lose.

That was posted earlier.  Told you to read it.

Don't bother me again with your lies.  I do apologize.  I used to say your dad was rolling over in his grave over the cowardly lying spawn his payday **** produced.  BUT, after learning what I have about your fantasy father I would say he was proud of your cowardice things you were a chip off the old block.

You omitted the line directly beneath it.


A year ago, we scrubbed the public record. Here are our updated findings.



 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 10:50 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:50 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:47 am

Really:

Trump and Epstein had a relationship, but there’s no evidence of Trump wrongdoing

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... newsletter

Busted you lying cowardly motherfucekr.  You lose.

That was posted earlier.  Told you to read it.

Don't bother me again with your lies.  I do apologize.  I used to say your dad was rolling over in his grave over the cowardly lying spawn his payday **** produced.  BUT, after learning what I have about your fantasy father I would say he was proud of your cowardice things you were a chip off the old block.

You omitted the line directly beneath it.


A year ago, we scrubbed the public record. Here are our updated findings.



 

 

I have not omitted anything, over ******. I posted the headline berbatim, in full and in context.

Acknolwedge.

We are done here.


 

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:54 am

I have not omitted anything, over ******. I posted the headline berbatim, in full and in context.

Acknolwedge.

We are done here.

The sentence beneath INDISPUTABLY qualified the evidence.

Yet more evidence that, in a courtroom, you'd be a doorstop..
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:58 am

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 10:54 am

I have not omitted anything, over ******. I posted the headline berbatim, in full and in context.

Acknolwedge.

We are done here.

The sentence beneath INDISPUTABLY qualified the evidence.

Yet more evidence that, in a courtroom, you'd be a doorstop..
 

 

You lost.  Move on.  
 
You can never accept I beat you again.  Post away.  It make you look like a bigger ****** than you already are.  I'll bump a thread that show what a sniveling little lying ****** you are,

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 11:00 am

You lost.  Move on.  
 

 

Tiny,

This is why you sit, slack jawed and yearning, before The Five.

The issue is over evidence NOT MADE PUBLIC.