*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 10:58 am » wrote: ↑The sentence beneath INDISPUTABLY qualified the evidence.*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ I have not omitted anything, over ******. I posted the headline berbatim, in full and in context.
Acknolwedge.
We are done here.
Yet more evidence that, in a courtroom, you'd be a doorstop..
You lost. Move on.
You can never accept I beat you again. Post away. It make you look like a bigger ****** than you already are. I'll bump a thread that show what a sniveling little lying ****** you are,
Stop bothering me with your edited quotes and spin. You lost, Cowardly ****.Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑Tiny,
This is why you sit, slack jawed and yearning, before The Five.
The issue is over evidence NOT MADE PUBLIC.
Tiny,*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑
Stop bothering me with your edited quotes and spin. You lost, Cowardly ****.
Looks like my link is based on the same article...*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑ And another article:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... newsletter
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom into the public recordROG62 » 29 Jul 2025, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑ Looks like my link is based on the same article...
At the time, we dug deep into the public record and awarded Four Pinocchios to a Democratic lawmaker who suggested Trump’s name was all over the files released by Delgado. Nothing has emerged since then to change our assessment that there is no public evidence of inappropriate behavior by Trump related to Epstein. As a reader service, our findings are presented below.
democrats...always swimming upstream in a sewer pipe...
ROG62 » 29 Jul 2025, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ As the political firestorm surrounding the late Jeffrey Epstein reignites, a recent report by The Washington Post finds that there is "no public evidence of any wrongdoing on [President Donald] Trump's part."
Despite that key finding, questions from lawmakers and media figures have dominated headlines in recent weeks about who was really involved with Epstein.
The newspaper's investigation found no credible allegations tying Trump to any illicit conduct related to Epstein or his trafficking network.
The Post's findings support Trump's own assertions.
He has repeatedly stated that he "had a falling out" with Epstein and "was not a fan."
https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/washi ... d/1220338/
how long will the democrats continue their incessant nothing burger handwringing...

brown, you utterly stupid ****, it's a WaPo article...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Newsmax is getting you jazzed because you are far too stupid to understand the distinction between that which is PUBLIC and the information that has never been released.ROG62 » 30 Jul 2025, 6:14 am » wrote: ↑ brown, you utterly stupid ****, it's a WaPo article...
**** cretin...
You and @ROG62 literally don't know **** between you.nefarious101 » 30 Jul 2025, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑ The average pedo=proressive democrat is still screaming "Russia Russia Russia" at protests....they are idiots
Epstein will be the same thing....idiots yelling fake news while being directed by fake news
turn off the fake news and the idiots will be lost on what they are supposed to be doing within 24 hours
And here's a jackass concerned about someone's sources.Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ I get that you people are stupid, but
the public record
The current furor is over what ISN'T yet public.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑ You and @ROG62 literally don't know **** between you.
It is due, in large part, to the **** to which you listen.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑ I get that you people are stupid, but
the public record
The current furor is over what ISN'T yet public.
Those stoking said furor are NOT only on the left..
*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ Considering the last 4 years were under a Dem admin that pulled no stops when it came to trying to keep Tump of office I believe there is no evidence trump was tied to the Epstein scandal.
That is how one takes a stand.
that pulled no stops when it came to trying to keep Tump of office
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 6:22 am » wrote: ↑*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 6:21 am » wrote: ↑ Considering the last 4 years were under a Dem admin that pulled no stops when it came to trying to keep Tump of office I believe there is no evidence trump was tied to the Epstein scandal.
That is how one takes a stand.that pulled no stops when it came to trying to keep Tump of office
How so?
:rofl:*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑ LMAO! Yo will have to take a stand first. New rules, Buddy. Start a thread. This is about no evidence tying Trump to the Epstein Scandal.
*Huey » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑
7 minutes ago
Considering the last 4 years were under a Dem admin that pulled no stops when it came to trying to keep Tump of office I believe there is no evidence trump was tied to the Epstein scandal.
That is how one takes a stand.

It's like Naffy-be-Gone...nefarious101 » 30 Jul 2025, 6:31 am » wrote: ↑ Why Fake News Dickhead?....you doing an investigation on how to not lose?
Won't work....you're a Fake News Dickhead.
Remember you posted Russia Russia Russia fake news for 5 years
even when the hoax fell apart you were still posting Fake News about it
stay in your lane...the losing lane...you are very very good at it
It begins with a "premise"...specifically
You'd get eviscerated in a courtroom.Considering the last 4 years were under a Dem admin that pulled no stops when it came to trying to keep Tump of office
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑It begins with a "premise"...specificallyYou'd get eviscerated in a courtroom.Considering the last 4 years were under a Dem admin that pulled no stops when it came to trying to keep Tump of office