Liberal Forum

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:18 am

Mr Vegetable, I appreciate your input and OPINION.

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:12 am

Have you found that evidence yet that WAPO can't seem to find?

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 9:41 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:41 am

I get that you people are stupid, but

the public record

The current furor is over what ISN'T yet public.

Those stoking said furor are NOT only on the left..

ROG62 » 31 Jul 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:23 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:12 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:12 am

Have you found that evidence yet that WAPO can't seem to find?

apparently WaPo isn't the reliable news source that it once was...or basically the last time he referenced it... 

 

ConsRule » 31 Jul 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:27 am

The Biden Department of Justice had all the information in "the Epstein file" for three years after Maxwell was convicted. If there is admissible evidence why didn't they indict and prosecute him? If the information is only humiliating and would destroy (or badly damage him) politically, why didn't they release it to help Commie-la avoid the *** kicking she received?

I understand you won't answer the questions and will just resort to deflection and/or name calling, but maybe another liberal here will make an attempt.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:41 am

ConsRule » 31 Jul 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:27 am

The Biden Department of Justice had all the information in "the Epstein file" for three years after Maxwell was convicted. If there is admissible evidence why didn't they indict and prosecute him? If the information is only humiliating and would destroy (or badly damage him) politically, why didn't they release it to help Commie-la avoid the *** kicking she received?

I understand you won't answer the questions and will just resort to deflection and/or name calling, but maybe another liberal here will make an attempt.

C'mon, Cunny...

Not now...

https://youtu.be/gwkHz0S8Xko?si=877HCIMfg1EwUGti

 

 

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:44 am

Sure Trump 

*Huey » 29 Jul 2025, 9:33 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 9:33 am

ROG62 » 29 Jul 2025, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:02 am

As the political firestorm surrounding the late Jeffrey Epstein reignites, a recent report by The Washington Post finds that there is "no public evidence of any wrongdoing on [President Donald] Trump's part."

 Despite that key finding, questions from lawmakers and media figures have dominated headlines in recent weeks about who was really involved with Epstein.

 The newspaper's investigation found no credible allegations tying Trump to any illicit conduct related to Epstein or his trafficking network.

 The Post's findings support Trump's own assertions.

 He has repeatedly stated that he "had a falling out" with Epstein and "was not a fan."

https://www.newsmax.com/newsfront/washi ... d/1220338/

how long will the democrats continue their incessant nothing burger handwringing...
 


 

And another article:

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... newsletter
 

 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 10:45 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:45 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:44 am

Sure Trump 

Stalky, please..

 

 

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:44 am

Sure Trump may have been named.  

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:01 pm

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:44 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:44 am

Sure Trump may have been named.  

No more interpretations, Verbal...

 

 

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm

I'm sorry Sir, but I can't comment on partial quotes.  Yo may try again.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:03 pm

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm

I'm sorry Sir, but I can't comment on partial quotes.  Yo may try again.

No one is asking you to.

 

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:07 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:07 pm

Noted, Mr vegetable.  I guess you have expended your knowledge of the subject so unless it is on topic I have a wonderful time.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 2:14 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:14 pm

I've debunked the OP..

I'm perfectly good with that.

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:17 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:17 pm

Mr. Vegetabe,  you under the delusion that you have game.  

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 2:19 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:19 pm

Frediñho, please...

It wasn't very difficult....it's newsmax...

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:22 pm

Actually no Sir, I posted direct from WAPO.  And you have yet to post the evidence that at this point Trump did anything illegal RE: Epstein.

Mr Veggie, please let me now when you do.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 2:30 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:30 pm

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:22 pm

Actually no Sir, I posted direct from WAPO.  And you have yet to post the evidence that at this point Trump did anything illegal RE: Epstein.

Mr Veggie, please let me now when you do.

Tiny, you brainless little ****.

The ENTIRE POINT is that Newsmax is trying to convince you that Grifty is cleared of any matters involving Epstein. 

This is false.

Most recently the WSJ sent Grifty into another lying fit by reporting on a salacious communication between the sex offender and the rapist.

Nod, Toady.

 

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:33 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 2:33 pm

Mr. Veggie, I suggest you step away from the keyboard, prepare for your trip to the Gym and your avid viewing of The Five, because you are definitely in meltdown mode.

I suggest you DO NOT perv over young ladies.

Oh, and for the record, I never that point so calm down.  You still got those mental health resources I so kindly posted for you this morning.

ANd I am not The one cussing and insulating in such an angry manner.

because you are definitely in meltdown mode.

I suggest you DO NOT perv over young ladies.

Oh, and for the record, I never that point so calm down