Liberal Forum

"Dems Blame Guns!"

I didn't catch any of the analysis, but Gutfeld must surely have needed to ice his face after that prolonged jam.


The second story?

"Gunman Kills 4 in NYC".


Their audience must be the dumbest herd of sheep on Earth.

Imagine being so **** slack jawed that you RECORD it...

A woman married to a man like that could be forgiven for drinking and seeking other men to father her children.





 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm

"Dems Blame Guns!"

I didn't catch any of the analysis, but Gutfeld must surely have needed to ice his face after that prolonged jam.

The second story?

"Gunman Kills 4 in NYC".

Their audience must be the dumbest herd of sheep on Earth.

Imagine being so **** slack jawed that you RECORD it...

A woman married to a man like that could be forgiven for drinking and seeking other men to father her children.

You're trolling now, but I haven't dismissed that you really are that stupid.

RebelGator » 29 Jul 2025, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 5:58 pm

You're trolling now, but I haven't dismissed that you really are that stupid.

You had your shot...

You soiled yourself...
 

Soon as I say Jessica Tarlov was on, I turn it off.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm

"Dems Blame Guns!"

I didn't catch any of the analysis, but Gutfeld must surely have needed to ice his face after that prolonged jam.

The second story?

"Gunman Kills 4 in NYC".

Their audience must be the dumbest herd of sheep on Earth.

Imagine being so **** slack jawed that you RECORD it...

A woman married to a man like that could be forgiven for drinking and seeking other men to father her children.

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

What did the view cry about today?

BuckNaked » 29 Jul 2025, 11:44 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 11:44 pm

What did the view cry about today?

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm

"Dems Blame Guns!"

I didn't catch any of the analysis, but Gutfeld must surely have needed to ice his face after that prolonged jam.

The second story?

"Gunman Kills 4 in NYC".

Their audience must be the dumbest herd of sheep on Earth.

Imagine being so **** slack jawed that you RECORD it...

A woman married to a man like that could be forgiven for drinking and seeking other men to father her children.

^^^ stupid **** watches "The Five".."                     
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm

"Dems Blame Guns!"

I didn't catch any of the analysis, but Gutfeld must surely have needed to ice his face after that prolonged jam.

The second story?

"Gunman Kills 4 in NYC".

Their audience must be the dumbest herd of sheep on Earth.

Imagine being so **** slack jawed that you RECORD it...

A woman married to a man like that could be forgiven for drinking and seeking other men to father her children.

So we should now engage in the fierce debate that we should only allow flag  football?

No head bangers allowed.   The players can wear ballerina tutus..  Hell, even transgenders will be able to compete.

ROG62 » 30 Jul 2025, 12:19 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 12:19 am

^^^ stupid **** watches "The Five".."                   

I am glad you figured out Fux News is Phooked in the Head.

Maybe you'll figure out the new bag of junk your eating is shyt for info. Newsmacks and One Asshole Network are total crap.

Do you even know what is being discussed?

Tarlov is sexy smart. Gutfield is aptly named.   He must squeeze the phook out of his sphincter and use a whole roll of toilet paper when he takes a crap.
 

ROG62 » 30 Jul 2025, 12:19 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 12:19 am

^^^ stupid **** watches "The Five".."                   

No...but some dumb **** actually cites patriotradio.

Were I that stupid, I'd smother myself. 
 

JohnnyYou » 30 Jul 2025, 2:38 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 2:38 am

I am glad you figured out Fux News is Phooked in the Head.

Maybe you'll figure out the new bag of junk your eating is shyt for info. Newsmacks and One Asshole Network are total crap.

Do you even know what is being discussed?

Tarlov is sexy smart. Gutfield is aptly named.   He must squeeze the phook out of his sphincter and use a whole roll of toilet paper when he takes a crap.

It's more than that...

@ROG62  is one of those idiots who, after decades of faithful viewership, abandoned FOX because it stopped telling him what he wanted to hear...

Imagine how **** Patriotradio must be.
 

squatchman. avatar squatchman. -1 Today, 1:08 am

"I hate you, Blackvegetable, and if I wasn't impotent....."

RebelGator » 29 Jul 2025, 5:58 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 5:58 pm

You're trolling now, but I haven't dismissed that you really are that stupid.

Are you seeing your portrait, Polk Salad....or were you that woman?

Vegas » 29 Jul 2025, 7:27 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 7:27 pm

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 

 

And?

JohnnyYou » 30 Jul 2025, 2:38 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 2:38 am

I am glad you figured out Fux News is Phooked in the Head.

Maybe you'll figure out the new bag of junk your eating is shyt for info. Newsmacks and One Asshole Network are total crap.

Do you even know what is being discussed?

Tarlov is sexy smart. Gutfield is aptly named.   He must squeeze the phook out of his sphincter and use a whole roll of toilet paper when he takes a crap.

brown always "claims he doesn't watch FNC", yet he's the only one here who mentions it and always KNOWS what's on...  

brown's a **** idiot and no one gives a flying **** what the lil bitch's whine of the day is...

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm

"Dems Blame Guns!"

I didn't catch any of the analysis, but Gutfeld must surely have needed to ice his face after that prolonged jam.


The second story?

"Gunman Kills 4 in NYC".


Their audience must be the dumbest herd of sheep on Earth.

Imagine being so **** slack jawed that you RECORD it...

A woman married to a man like that could be forgiven for drinking and seeking other men to father her children.





 

 

Sir, that is not how the segment started.  It started with the the chyron "Horror in NYC" Gunmen kills four including NYPD Police Officer.  Then goes to a live report from Nate Foy.  Showing workers fixing the building.  Basically a straight report on what happened.

Then they went into the fact that CNN said the gunmen was possibly white.  Then a couple of dems and reporters talking about the guns themselves.

Greg pointed out that the gun used was already illegal in NYC and a concealed carry permit does not allow you to carry it in NYC.

SO I suggest you watch this and then come on back:

https://youtu.be/8YTQbH-nunQ?si=4sZxLSvZPNyRJrrs

That is the opening segment. Maybe you should watch it so you can be a little more informed.

It seems you are having a meltdown.

 

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 7:08 am

Sir, that is not how the segment started.  It started with the the chyron "Horror in NYC" Gunmen kills four including NYPD Police Officer.  Then goes to a live report from Nate Foy.  Showing workers fixing the building.  Basically a straight report on what happened.

Then they went into the fact that CNN said the gunmen was possibly white.  Then a couple of dems and reporters talking about the guns themselves.

Greg pointed out that the gun used was already illegal in NYC and a concealed carry permit does not allow you to carry it in NYC.

SO I suggest you watch this and then come on back:

https://youtu.be/8YTQbH-nunQ?si=4sZxLSvZPNyRJrrs

That is the opening segment. Maybe you should watch it so you can be a little more informed.

It seems you are having a meltdown.

My bad....I was working back from 5 or 6 minutes in...

I missed them going to the "Communist" angle at 2:35....

At 3 minutes they start in on The White Thing...
 
4 minutes into the show it's on to the Dems....and Greg Gutfeld's face..

Which gets two full minutes...


If only that wanton woman knew this...

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 7:20 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 7:08 am

Sir, that is not how the segment started.  It started with the the chyron "Horror in NYC" Gunmen kills four including NYPD Police Officer.  Then goes to a live report from Nate Foy.  Showing workers fixing the building.  Basically a straight report on what happened.

Then they went into the fact that CNN said the gunmen was possibly white.  Then a couple of dems and reporters talking about the guns themselves.

Greg pointed out that the gun used was already illegal in NYC and a concealed carry permit does not allow you to carry it in NYC.

SO I suggest you watch this and then come on back:

https://youtu.be/8YTQbH-nunQ?si=4sZxLSvZPNyRJrrs

That is the opening segment. Maybe you should watch it so you can be a little more informed.

It seems you are having a meltdown.

My bad....I was working back from 5 or 6 minutes in...

I missed them going to the "Communist" angle at 2:35....

At 3 minutes they start in on The White Thing...
 
4 minutes into the show it's on to the Dems....and Greg Gutfeld's face..

Which gets two full minutes...


If only that wanton woman knew this...

 

I highly recommend you actually watch the entire segment.  Greg was actually talking about how laws are not going to stop this.

Because as already posted the gun is against the law in NY.

Unless you have something on topic to discuss have a nice day, Sir.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm

"Dems Blame Guns!"

I didn't catch any of the analysis, but Gutfeld must surely have needed to ice his face after that prolonged jam.

The second story?

"Gunman Kills 4 in NYC".

Their audience must be the dumbest herd of sheep on Earth.

Imagine being so **** slack jawed that you RECORD it...

A woman married to a man like that could be forgiven for drinking and seeking other men to father her children.

Hey fake news dickhead...

you're trying too hard.....

you're looking desperate and unhinged...

calm down....