Your posts are getting increasingly more dazed and confused.....has your AC in the condex gone on the blink or something?Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ My bad....I was working back from 5 or 6 minutes in...
I missed them going to the "Communist" angle at 2:35....
At 3 minutes they start in on The White Thing...
4 minutes into the show it's on to the Dems....and Greg Gutfeld's face..
Which gets two full minutes...
If only that wanton woman knew this...
RebelGator » 30 Jul 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑Your posts are getting increasingly more dazed and confused.....has your AC in the condex gone on the blink or something?Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ My bad....I was working back from 5 or 6 minutes in...
I missed them going to the "Communist" angle at 2:35....
At 3 minutes they start in on The White Thing...
4 minutes into the show it's on to the Dems....and Greg Gutfeld's face..
Which gets two full minutes...
If only that wanton woman knew this...
What did I miss?*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑ The poor fella has been in a severe mental decline since November 24.
Greg says what he's paid to say.*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑ I highly recommend you actually watch the entire segment. Greg was actually talking about how laws are not going to stop this.
Because as already posted the gun is against the law in NY.
Unless you have something on topic to discuss have a nice day, Sir.
Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑ "Dems Blame Guns!"
I didn't catch any of the analysis, but Gutfeld must surely have needed to ice his face after that prolonged jam.
The second story?
"Gunman Kills 4 in NYC".
Their audience must be the dumbest herd of sheep on Earth.
Imagine being so **** slack jawed that you RECORD it...
A woman married to a man like that could be forgiven for drinking and seeking other men to father her children.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑Greg says what he's paid to say.*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 7:23 am » wrote: ↑ I highly recommend you actually watch the entire segment. Greg was actually talking about how laws are not going to stop this.
Because as already posted the gun is against the law in NY.
Unless you have something on topic to discuss have a nice day, Sir.
We know this because Tuck-Tuck spilled the beans...
You are the dumbest human being alive.*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ I thought Tucker was NOT a reliable source. Odd how this works.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑You are the dumbest human being alive.*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ I thought Tucker was NOT a reliable source. Odd how this works.
Your opinion is noted.Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑You two twats are pathological.*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ It really sets him off if you just ignore his attempts at insults and just post on the topic.
You're promiscuous with the evidence.
Are these your words?
Try again, **** wannabe. Karen LMMFAO! Anonymous Salem ******, You have my name, my picture, my address and a pic of my house. No ****** Karen's here, anonymous ******. When you post that stuff about you like I did I will plan a trip to Salem. Until then you are another flabby assed anonymous punk with chicken legs and needing hair plugs.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑You're promiscuous with the evidence.
Not at all.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 8:02 am » wrote: ↑Are these your words?Try again, **** wannabe. Karen LMMFAO! Anonymous Salem ******, You have my name, my picture, my address and a pic of my house. No ****** Karen's here, anonymous ******. When you post that stuff about you like I did I will plan a trip to Salem. Until then you are another flabby assed anonymous punk with chicken legs and needing hair plugs.
*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑You're promiscuous with the evidence.
No Sir. I think you were a little confused. Probably a high from endorphins and dopamine produced from your workout caused a moment of mental confusion concerning what was actually discussed.
I can't be promiscuous with the evidence when it is I who actually posted the segment in full and in context, that you are discussing.
Enjoy!
That part is important because it shows what you were doing when you were watching the Five, a show you are an avid fan of. It leads to your mental condition at the time.No Sir. I think you were a little confused. Probably a high from endorphins and dopamine produced from your workout caused a moment of mental confusion concerning what was actually discussed.
This portion is important because it directly rebuts you point in the post I replied to. Now, with that said, I can not believe a gentleman of alleged higher intellect would intentionally, and disingenuously, leave out such an important piece of the post.I can't be promiscuous with the evidence when it is I who actually posted the segment in full and in context, that you are discussing.
Enjoy!
Your attempts to "do Blackvegetable" are not worth reading.*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ I do apologize sir but I must point out there are some key points of my post missing from the quote:
That part is important because it shows what you were doing when you were watching the Five, a show you are an avid fan of. It leads to your mental condition at the time.
This portion is important because it directly rebuts you point in the post I replied to. Now, with that said, I can not believe a gentleman of alleged higher intellect would intentionally, and disingenuously, leave out such an important piece of the post.
I respectively recommend you check for a virus on your device.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑Your attempts to "do Blackvegetable" are not worth reading.*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑ I do apologize sir but I must point out there are some key points of my post missing from the quote:
That part is important because it shows what you were doing when you were watching the Five, a show you are an avid fan of. It leads to your mental condition at the time.
This portion is important because it directly rebuts you point in the post I replied to. Now, with that said, I can not believe a gentleman of alleged higher intellect would intentionally, and disingenuously, leave out such an important piece of the post.
I respectively recommend you check for a virus on your device.
If you have run out of talking points, Good Day on this topic, Sir.I can't be promiscuous with the evidence when it is I who actually posted the segment in full and in context, that you are discussing.
Enjoy!
You have NEVER posted a "devastating rebuttal"....you don't have the onions for that job.*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑ Sir, my devastating rebuttal is a matter of record.
If you have run out of talking points, Good Day on this topic, Sir.
Do you have a Vanity Fair picture to back up that claim?Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑ You have NEVER posted a "devastating rebuttal"....you don't have the onions for that job.