Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:37 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:35 am

Sir, my devastating rebuttal is a matter of record.

If you have run out of talking points, Good Day on this topic, Sir.

You have NEVER posted a "devastating rebuttal"....you don't have the onions for that job.

Your opinion is noted, Sir.  
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 5:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 5:13 am

No...but some dumb **** actually cites patriotradio.

Were I that stupid, I'd smother myself.

brown...you are...


 
now do the bobblehead nod...
 

ROG62 » 30 Jul 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:44 am

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 5:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 5:13 am

No...but some dumb **** actually cites patriotradio.

Were I that stupid, I'd smother myself.

brown...you are...


 

 

Yes, that is quite a contradiction on Mr. Vegetbale's part.  

It is a shame he misrepresented the first segment of the five from yesterday.  He may have learned something if he wasn't repeating what he was told to think.

Ho*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:46 am

Yes, that is quite a contradiction on Mr. Vegetbale's part.  

It is a shame he misrepresented the first segment of the five from yesterday.  He may have learned something if he wasn't repeating what he was told to think.

Elaborate on this "contradiction"...

ROG62 » 30 Jul 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:44 am

brown...you are...


 
now do the bobblehead nod...

He only comments, succinctly, on the news....he doesn't fabricate it.

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:44 am

Your opinion is noted, Sir.

It's a fact.
 
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:49 am

Ho*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:46 am

Yes, that is quite a contradiction on Mr. Vegetbale's part.  

It is a shame he misrepresented the first segment of the five from yesterday.  He may have learned something if he wasn't repeating what he was told to think.

Elaborate on this "contradiction"...

 

SIr, on the one hand you condemn a source because you feel they are biased and on the other you have a biased anonymous poster posing in his bathrobe and full face shower cap, with a good possibility he ives in his mother's basement, whose word you take as gospel.

Acknowledge you were answered, Sir.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 5:17 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 5:17 am

It's more than that...

@ROG62  is one of those idiots who, after decades of faithful viewership, abandoned FOX because it stopped telling him what he wanted to hear...

Imagine how **** Patriotradio must be.

Imagine how **** Babblebuzzzz must be...


 

ROG62 » 30 Jul 2025, 8:54 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:54 am

Imagine how **** Babblebuzzzz must be...


 

I don't have to...I get its "conservative" feed...

You people are **** morons.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 7:33 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 7:33 am

Greg says what he's paid to say.

We know this because Tuck-Tuck spilled the beans...

link?
 

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 7:36 am

I thought Tucker was NOT a reliable source.   Odd how this works.  Now you are a tucker fan.

  what a **** twit brown is...

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:53 am

SIr, on the one hand you condemn a source because you feel they are biased and on the other you have a biased anonymous poster posing in his bathrobe and full face shower cap, with a good possibility he ives in his mother's basement, whose word you take as gospel.

Acknowledge you were answered, Sir.

you condemn a source because you feel they are biased

are you talking about the source which paid 787 million, and the head of Tuck-Tuck for promoting the hallucinations of a woman who speaks to cactii?


Or are you referring to the facial tic and unibrow panel discussion cosplay they call The Five?

on the other you have a biased anonymous poster

A blogger, who posts his name at the bottom of every column.

and full face shower cap

It's a luchador mask, you **** nitwit.

with a good possibility he ives in his mother's basement,

There's an equally good possibility that you are a serial child diddler.

whose word you take as gospel.

He comments, while linking to the story in question....but I rarely quote him. When I do it is because of his chops....he is an "author", he's better with words than Gutfeld is with his face.

Acknowledge you were answered, Sir.

I was answered...

Acknowledge that you have been de-limbed...

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:09 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:53 am

SIr, on the one hand you condemn a source because you feel they are biased and on the other you have a biased anonymous poster posing in his bathrobe and full face shower cap, with a good possibility he ives in his mother's basement, whose word you take as gospel.

Acknowledge you were answered, Sir.

you condemn a source because you feel they are biased

are you talking about the source which paid 787 million, and the head of Tuck-Tuck for promoting the hallucinations of a woman who speaks to cactii?


Or are you referring to the facial tic and unibrow panel discussion cosplay they call The Five?

on the other you have a biased anonymous poster

A blogger, who posts his name at the bottom of every column.

and full face shower cap

It's a luchador mask, you **** nitwit.

with a good possibility he ives in his mother's basement,

There's an equally good possibility that you are a serial child diddler.

whose word you take as gospel.

He comments, while linking to the story in question....but I rarely quote him. When I do it is because of his chops....he is an "author", he's better with words than Gutfeld is with his face.

Acknowledge you were answered, Sir.

I was answered...

Acknowledge that you have been de-limbed...

 

There's an equally good possibility that you are a serial child diddler.

Acknowledge that you have been de-limbed...

I see your anger is growing.  Take it easy, man, relax.

My stand apparently remans.  Don't see one from you.


(PS) You are gonna have to do MUCH BETTER.  LMAO!
 

RebelGator » 30 Jul 2025, 8:39 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:39 am

Do you have a Vanity Fair picture to back up that claim?

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jul 2025, 5:34 pm

"Dems Blame Guns!"

I didn't catch any of the analysis, but Gutfeld must surely have needed to ice his face after that prolonged jam.


The second story?

"Gunman Kills 4 in NYC".


Their audience must be the dumbest herd of sheep on Earth.

Imagine being so **** slack jawed that you RECORD it...

A woman married to a man like that could be forgiven for drinking and seeking other men to father her children.





 

 

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 8:37 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:37 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 8:35 am

Sir, my devastating rebuttal is a matter of record.

If you have run out of talking points, Good Day on this topic, Sir.

You have NEVER posted a "devastating rebuttal"....you don't have the onions for that job.

 

Your title:

"The Lead Story On The Five Today" (Yesterday)

As I showed with links and the video of the lead segment what you posted in the OP is not the lead story.  The lead story was a straight news report on the shooting that occurred.  No opinion was offered by the reporter.  

And then you misrepresented what Gutfeld's OPINION was.  As per the in full, in context of the opening lead segment shows.

Good day Sir.

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:29 am

Your title:

"The Lead Story On The Five Today" (Yesterday)

As I showed with links and the video of the lead segment what you posted in the OP is not the lead story.  The lead story was a straight news report on the shooting that occurred.  No opinion was offered by the reporter.  

And then you misrepresented what Gutfeld's OPINION was.  As per the in full, in context of the opening lead segment shows.

Good day Sir.

It was a correction, which I placed in context..

They spent 2:35 on the story...

Then it was on to the spin.
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:32 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:29 am

Your title:

"The Lead Story On The Five Today" (Yesterday)

As I showed with links and the video of the lead segment what you posted in the OP is not the lead story.  The lead story was a straight news report on the shooting that occurred.  No opinion was offered by the reporter.  

And then you misrepresented what Gutfeld's OPINION was.  As per the in full, in context of the opening lead segment shows.

Good day Sir.

It was a correction, which I placed in context..

They spent 2:35 on the story...

Then it was on to the spin.
 

 

Well, I am sure they have a comment section.  And since you did not hear it, or view the entire segment, I really can't take your word for it.  

And again that is an opinion show.  Just like that fool, Shower Cap.  Nothing but Opinion.

As far as the comment section I know you are quite familiar with newspaper style comment sections.  That is why at USMB and when you first got here you were afraid to leave that one thread.
 

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:34 am

Well, I am sure they have a comment section.  

Try to stay on topic...

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:34 am

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:32 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:29 am

Your title:

"The Lead Story On The Five Today" (Yesterday)

As I showed with links and the video of the lead segment what you posted in the OP is not the lead story.  The lead story was a straight news report on the shooting that occurred.  No opinion was offered by the reporter.  

And then you misrepresented what Gutfeld's OPINION was.  As per the in full, in context of the opening lead segment shows.

Good day Sir.

It was a correction, which I placed in context..

They spent 2:35 on the story...

Then it was on to the spin.

Well, I am sure they have a comment section.  And since you did not hear it, or view the entire segment, I really can't take your word for it.  

And again that is an opinion show.  Just like that fool, Shower Cap.  Nothing but Opinion.

As far as the comment section I know you are quite familiar with newspaper style comment sections.  That is why at USMB and when you first got here you were afraid to leave that one thread.

 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:35 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:34 am

Well, I am sure they have a comment section.

Try to stay on topic...

Umm, this is awkward and embarrassing....most of it is on topic.  You edited it out.

I guess we are done. When you start distorting the truth there is no need to continue.

In summary, you misrepresented the opening segment, and conflated an opinion show with straight news show.  

By on this one, Sir. My work here is done.
 

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:38 am

Umm, this is awkward and embarrassing....

If course....

It's your rule, and you forgot..


Again.