Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 7:25 am

*Beekeeper » 31 Jul 2025, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 7:24 am

Still got nothing, huh??

Nice try, but your attempt here fell far short of anything that addressed your own hypocrisy.

No..

Same as it ever was.

You're a moron. 
 

 

Good morning Mr. Vegetable, as an avid viewer of the FIVE could you tell us what the lead story of the FIVE was yesterday and what Emily's opinion of it was?

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 7:25 am

No..

Same as it ever was.

You're a moron.

So, you are gasping for air here.

Nothing, huh??

So which version of Tucker are you approving of?? Because for the overwhelming majority of people, there aren't 2 versions. Seems only YOU and your side want to try to make a 2nd version appear magically. That way, when he kicks your bloviating to the curb, you can blame the version you don't like.

*Beekeeper » 31 Jul 2025, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 7:48 am

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 7:25 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 7:25 am

No..

Same as it ever was.

You're a moron.

So, you are gasping for air here.

Nothing, huh??

So which version of Tucker are you approving of?? Because for the overwhelming majority of people, there aren't 2 versions. Seems only YOU and your side want to try to make a 2nd version appear magically. That way, when he kicks your bloviating to the curb, you can blame the version you don't like.

 

Poor Mr. Vegetable is victim of his own malaise, being too weak to check things on his own, relying on others to formulate his opinions at any given time.  At one point he was influenced to say Tucker was a partisan sell out and at another point he was told to the man was credible and believe what he says.

 

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 7:53 am

Poor Mr. Vegetable is victim of his own malaise, being too weak to check things on his own, relying on others to formulate his opinions at any given time.  At one point he was influenced to say Tucker was a partisan sell out and at another point he was told to the man was credible and believe what he says.

There's good reason why neither of you were deemed fit for higher education. 

*Beekeeper » 31 Jul 2025, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 7:48 am

So, you are gasping for air here.

Nothing, huh??

So which version of Tucker are you approving of?? Because for the overwhelming majority of people, there aren't 2 versions. Seems only YOU and your side want to try to make a 2nd version appear magically. That way, when he kicks your bloviating to the curb, you can blame the version you don't like.

Do you want to see the evidence from which Tiny is running?

Tiny doesn't. 
 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:28 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 7:53 am

Poor Mr. Vegetable is victim of his own malaise, being too weak to check things on his own, relying on others to formulate his opinions at any given time.  At one point he was influenced to say Tucker was a partisan sell out and at another point he was told to the man was credible and believe what he says.

There's good reason why neither of you were deemed fit for higher education. 

 

Mr. Vegetable, have you ever considered switching to Decaf? Or even halfcaf?  

Your argument on this thread is similar to the one about Height on IMDB.  Apparently, when your influencers tell it suits your argument you belief one thing.  But they tell the complete opposite concerning the reliability of a source you believe that as well.

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:31 am

Mr. Vegetable, have you ever considered switching to Decaf? Or even halfcaf?  

Your argument on this thread is similar to the one about Height on IMDB.  Apparently, when your influencers tell it suits your argument you belief one thing.  But they tell the complete opposite concerning the reliability of a source you believe that as well.

Your argument on this thread is similar to the one about Height on IMDB.

I don't have any such thread.

That is yet another diversion from which you are running..

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:29 am

Do you want to see the evidence from which Tiny is running?

Tiny doesn't.

Absolutely!! If you dare post it!!

That way we can dismantle you and your "argument' in one fell swoop.
 

*Beekeeper » 31 Jul 2025, 8:34 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:34 am

Absolutely!! If you date post it!!

That way we can dismantle you and your "argument' in one fell swoop.

viewtopic.php?t=95998

That way we can dismantle you and your "argument' in one fell swoop

You?


:rofl:  

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 8:29 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:29 am

*Beekeeper » 31 Jul 2025, 7:48 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 7:48 am

So, you are gasping for air here.

Nothing, huh??

So which version of Tucker are you approving of?? Because for the overwhelming majority of people, there aren't 2 versions. Seems only YOU and your side want to try to make a 2nd version appear magically. That way, when he kicks your bloviating to the curb, you can blame the version you don't like.

Do you want to see the evidence from which Tiny is running?

Tiny doesn't. 
 

 

Please, Sir, keep your honesty and character levels elevated.  We are having a discussion about how you never follow thru on this type of stuff.  By all means, post what you got.  And please stop dishonestly portraying my [ositions.
Thank You, Mr Vegetable and have a blessed day.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 8:33 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:33 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:31 am

Mr. Vegetable, have you ever considered switching to Decaf? Or even halfcaf?  

Your argument on this thread is similar to the one about Height on IMDB.  Apparently, when your influencers tell it suits your argument you belief one thing.  But they tell the complete opposite concerning the reliability of a source you believe that as well.

Your argument on this thread is similar to the one about Height on IMDB.

I don't have any such thread.

That is yet another diversion from which you are running..

 

Mr Vegetable, I know you partake of weed ofter and I personally have nothing against that you do understand that memory problems are one of the drawbacks.  

Here is that thread that you speak of:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=96861

I see that as usual you are more interested in making threads about posters than you are actual topics.

Carry on, Sir.  

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:38 am

Please, Sir, keep your honesty and character levels elevated.  We are having a discussion about how you never follow thru on this type of stuff.  By all means, post what you got.  And please stop dishonestly portraying my [ositions.
Thank You, Mr Vegetable and have a blessed day.

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=95998

honesty and character

:die:  


 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 8:35 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:35 am

viewtopic.php?t=95998

You?

Basically, you are admitting to RUNNING from the question posed. And that you have no rebuttal except to post the actually question posed without any answer on your part.

That sure sounds mighty chicken excrement to anyone watching. 

Now, you said you had REBUTTAL. Still waiting on that OTHER than a question you refuse to answer. Rebuttal means you present YOUR side of the equation. Running isn't it.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:43 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 8:38 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:38 am

Please, Sir, keep your honesty and character levels elevated.  We are having a discussion about how you never follow thru on this type of stuff.  By all means, post what you got.  And please stop dishonestly portraying my [ositions.
Thank You, Mr Vegetable and have a blessed day.

https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=95998

honesty and character

 


 

 

I am sorry Mr Vegetable, I don't see a link. Sir, you wouldn't be hiding the post I was responding to in the partial quote, would you?

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:45 am

I am sorry Mr Vegetable, I don't see a link. 

Do you see all your words?

 

*Beekeeper » 31 Jul 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:45 am

Basically, you are admitting to 

I don't answer to your feefees.

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:41 am

Mr Vegetable, I know you partake of weed ofter and I personally have nothing against that you do understand that memory problems are one of the drawbacks.  

Here is that thread that you speak of:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=96861

I see that as usual you are more interested in making threads about posters than you are actual topics.

Carry on, Sir.

What is that thread about?

This is a test of your reading comprehension.....and courage...

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:50 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 8:41 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:41 am

Mr Vegetable, I know you partake of weed ofter and I personally have nothing against that you do understand that memory problems are one of the drawbacks.  

Here is that thread that you speak of:

viewtopic.php?f=3&t=96861

I see that as usual you are more interested in making threads about posters than you are actual topics.

Carry on, Sir.

What is that thread about?

This is a test of your reading comprehension.....and courage...

 

Mr. Vegetable, it is odd how you call people out, go off topic than you are upset when others follow and then call you out.

Sir, if you wish to stay on topic I would respectfully suggest you set the example.

I am still waiting for to fool thru on your threat to post what I am allegedly running from. So far is seems dishonest of you to say you always follow through.

 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:50 am

What is that thread about?

This is a test of your reading comprehension.....and courage...

And this aptly applies to you too.....

https://media.townhall.com/cdn/hodl/car ... -800x0.jpg



Because your goal in life is to try to destroy your perceived enemy, not find ways to work with them. It's all part and parcel to your narcissism and mental illness that accompanies that. The new term for that is TDS. Try educating yourself as to your symptoms and end result. 

America spoke. 19%. Ask me what that means.

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 8:53 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:53 am

Mr. Vegetable, it is odd 

You've made it about your reading comprehension....and cowardice.

Now stop running.