Liberal Forum

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:34 am

Mr Vegetable, by all means, proceed with your explanation concerning the purpose of your post.  Photographs are acceptable if there is a link to the actual post

Answer the question asked.



 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:34 am

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:30 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:26 am

This is entertaining, Mr Vegetable.  Even you can't explain the purpose of your post.

That's a lie.

But let's find out what, exactly, has you confused.

Let's begin with


Are photographs admissible as evidence?

 


 

Mr Vegetable, by all means, proceed with your explanation concerning the purpose of your post.  Photographs are acceptable if there is a link to the actual post.

Acknowledge you were answered.  No further questions will be entertained until you explain the meaning and purpose of the post in question.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:35 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:34 am

Mr Vegetable, by all means, proceed with your explanation concerning the purpose of your post.  Photographs are acceptable if there is a link to the actual post

Answer the question asked.



 

 

Mr. Vegetable, I am really concerned with your mental stability and reading comprehension:

You asked:

Are photographs admissible as evidence?

My answer

Photographs are acceptable if there is a link to the actual post.

Sir, all jokes and insults aside I am really concerned with your mental health and cognitive abilities.  Get help sir, You are not stable.

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:40 am

Mr. Vegetable, I am really concerned with your mental stability and reading comprehension:

You asked:

My answer

Sir, all jokes and insults aside I am really concerned with your mental health and cognitive abilities.  Get help sir, You are not stable.

Quimmie,

Photographs are admissible as evidence.


Period.


Nod.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:45 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 6:40 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:40 am

Mr. Vegetable, I am really concerned with your mental stability and reading comprehension:

You asked:

My answer

Sir, all jokes and insults aside I am really concerned with your mental health and cognitive abilities.  Get help sir, You are not stable.

Quimmie,

Photographs are admissible as evidence.


Period.


Nod.

 

You can admit them but I will not recognize them without a Link sir.  Also, you lied when yo claimed I did not answer.  Sir, opening with dishonest comments is not a good start.

Links to actual comments are admissible.  Comments like screen shots with no links to the comments will be ignored, Sir. Why are you hiding the context, corrects and admissions of mistakes?  I am sorry, but you do not get to order me around or set your own standards. Links to comments has always been a standard at any forum I have been at.  YOU are trying to hide comments and set this up so you always think you win.

Period

Nod.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 5:12 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 5:12 am

One of your fans asked me to forward this tribute...

https://i.postimg.cc/RVk8j15X/HOOEYVAGINA.jpg

why, did you have them stuck up your ***?
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 6:35 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:35 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 6:34 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 6:34 am

Mr Vegetable, by all means, proceed with your explanation concerning the purpose of your post.  Photographs are acceptable if there is a link to the actual post

Answer the question asked.



 

 

Here are two more weapons you will have to ban FMJ for. Both are arguably the two most popular 9 MM in the country. While the firearms are not optimized for combat, of course the FMJ rounds are.






Sif Sauer P365

And the Springfield Armory Hellcat 




 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:43 am

Here are two more weapons you will have to ban FMJ for. Both are arguably the two most popular 9 MM in the country. While the firearms are not optimized for combat, of course the FMJ rounds are.



Sif Sauer P365

And the Springfield Armory Hellcat 

Photographs, without links...

They could be melonballers...

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 7:45 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:45 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:43 am

Here are two more weapons you will have to ban FMJ for. Both are arguably the two most popular 9 MM in the country. While the firearms are not optimized for combat, of course the FMJ rounds are.



Sif Sauer P365

And the Springfield Armory Hellcat 

Photographs, without links...

They could be melonballers...

 

 

Mr Vegetable, I will provide links since you requested them. Sir, there is a difference in posting a photo of an inanimate object that is universally accepted AND taking a snippet of a conversation and omitting context.  Sir, in the future, I expect every single photo of anything you post will contain a link.  If not, so be it.

Here are your links:

Hellcat:

https://www.springfield-armory.com/firearm-selector/

Sig:

https://www.sigsauer.com/firearms/pistols/p365.html

 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:43 am

Here are two more weapons you will have to ban FMJ for. Both are arguably the two most popular 9 MM in the country. While the firearms are not optimized for combat, of course the FMJ rounds are.



Sif Sauer P365

And the Springfield Armory Hellcat 

If there's one subject on which you can go on unchallenged, it would be
"Carrying 9mms"....

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:55 am

Mr Vegetable, I will provide links since you requested them. 


 

Let's instead examine why you reflexively ignore your own rules....

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 7:58 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:58 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 7:43 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:43 am

Here are two more weapons you will have to ban FMJ for. Both are arguably the two most popular 9 MM in the country. While the firearms are not optimized for combat, of course the FMJ rounds are.



Sif Sauer P365

And the Springfield Armory Hellcat 

If there's one subject on which you can go on unchallenged, it would be
"Carrying 9mms"....

 

Sir, that is another cryptic post.  

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:59 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 7:55 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 7:55 am

Mr Vegetable, I will provide links since you requested them. 



 

Let's instead examine why you reflexively ignore your own rules....

 

IMr Vegetable, you should instead go back and read the post you edited and you will see the explanation.  I have told you that you embarrass yourself when instead of reading a post chose to delete it.  I am not going to repeat myself because you recklessly deleted something that has already been answered.

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:04 am

Sir, that is another cryptic post.  

IMr Vegetable, you should instead go back and read the post you edited and you will see the explanation.  I have told you that you embarrass yourself when instead of reading a post chose to delete it.  I am not going to repeat myself because you recklessly deleted something that has already been answered.

Sir, that is another cryptic post.  

To whom is it cryptic?

IMr Vegetable, you should instead go back and read 

First you must demonstrate that you are capable.

This thread is yet further indication that you are not.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 8:07 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:07 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 8:04 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:04 am

Sir, that is another cryptic post.  

IMr Vegetable, you should instead go back and read the post you edited and you will see the explanation.  I have told you that you embarrass yourself when instead of reading a post chose to delete it.  I am not going to repeat myself because you recklessly deleted something that has already been answered.

Sir, that is another cryptic post.  

To whom is it cryptic?

IMr Vegetable, you should instead go back and read 

First you must demonstrate that you are capable.

This thread is yet further indication that you are not.

 

Mr Vegetable, I have no further interest in this aspect of he discussion until you go back and read what you edited out of the quote.  That answers your concern concerning links.  YOU must show ME that you are capable and intellectually armed for this conversation..

Once you do we can continue with your diversion.

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:11 am

Mr Vegetable, I have no further interest in this aspect of he discussion 

Then run from more of your words.

Perhaps you should post using less of them.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:18 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 8:11 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:11 am

Mr Vegetable, I have no further interest in this aspect of he discussion 

Then run from more of your words.

Perhaps you should post using less of them.

 

Sir, I do have an interest where originally you claimed the 9mm was not appropriate for civilian use, then said you weren't talking about the 9 mil but the Colt AR 15, and then contradicted that by calming you were talking about the 9 mm round.

Mr Vegetable, you would be better served if you just told the truth from the get go.  It would be less embarrassing for you.
 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:25 am

Sir, I do have an interest where originally you claimed the 9mm 

I don't talk about the 9mm..

You do...

And I've explained why.

But you're kinda thick, and your intellectual arsenal thin.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:29 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:25 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:25 am

Sir, I do have an interest where originally you claimed the 9mm 

I don't talk about the 9mm..

You do...

And I've explained why.

But you're kinda thick, and your intellectual arsenal thin.

 

Mr. Vegetable, Exactly what where you referring to when you made this statement:

Here are the links.

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

What is like the Colt AR 15?

 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:43 am

Mr. Vegetable, Exactly what where you referring to when you made this statement:

Here are the links.

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

What is like the Colt AR 15?

You have admitted that this question has been answered. 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 10:30 am

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:43 am

Mr. Vegetable, Exactly what where you referring to when you made this statement:

Here are the links.

*Huey »  Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie?  Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat.  And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.

BV's reply:

My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.

Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.

viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480

What is like the Colt AR 15?

You have admitted that this question has been answered. 

 

Sir, Yes, you have gone from you are not talking about the 9mm to you were talking about the round back to you were not talking about the 9 mil.  

Although I am not sure how th e9 mil round is LIKE the Colter AR 15 (It is obvious you were discussing the weapon) I will go with the round:

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:16 am

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 10:13 am

Sir, I will be More than happy to change it once you telL 


 

You've been told.

But now you must resolve whether you continue to confuse it with a weapon or a round....

 

 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 10:39 am

Sir, Yes, you have gone from you are not talking about the 9mm to you were talking about the round back to you were not talking about the 9 mil.  


 

Only in the constant retelling.

You've been given one answer to your question...

The rest is your abysmal level of literacy, examples of which are readily available.