Show me "melting down", in my words...*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑
Mr. Vegetable, I went ahead and reposted what you edited out because that is some very important info that would certainly benefit you.
Keep trying BV. Keep trying Budd. But I love your meltdown!
Sir, I think you need to up your game. You are making me yawn.Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 2:20 pm » wrote: ↑Show me "melting down", in my words...*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:16 pm » wrote: ↑
Mr. Vegetable, I went ahead and reposted what you edited out because that is some very important info that would certainly benefit you.
Keep trying BV. Keep trying Budd. But I love your meltdown!
Here is one. You are such an entertaining poster when you are melting down. Your attempts, Mr vegetable, while feeble, are kinda cute.Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑Just a fact...*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Potatohead, those are extremely tough words for a REMF office boy who remains anonymous.
A mincing coward....
Just check the @* on your tunic.
Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑Just a fact...*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Potatohead, those are extremely tough words for a REMF office boy who remains anonymous.
A mincing coward....
Just check the @* on your tunic.
Tiny,
Mr. Perv, oops, my sincerest apology, I mean Mr Vegetable, the question put to you is not about the Colt AR 15. The thread is not about Colt AR 15. There is no shame in not being able to understand the subject matter. Sometimes the greater part of valor is learning when to bow out. I mean it is ok that you do not know about things like aviation, helicopters, the military, firearms, driving, muscle car maintenance, etc. But your problem is you dig your hole deeper with each succeeding post.Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 3:03 pm » wrote: ↑Tiny,*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Vegetable, are you able to now distinguish between an FMJ round that is optimized for the military and a the more powerful hollow points it is recommended that civilians use for defense?
Sir, I have to test not only your comprehension, because the info has been provided, but your knowledge just tone certain you are intellectually capable of participating and giving meaningful contributions to the topic.
This article describes the many variations of the Colt AR-15 and M16 rifle family of weapons produced by Colt's Manufacturing Company. Weapons patterned on the original ArmaLite AR-15 design
*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:46 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 2:02 pm » wrote: ↑Just a fact...*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 2:00 pm » wrote: ↑ Mr. Potatohead, those are extremely tough words for a REMF office boy who remains anonymous.
A mincing coward....
Just check the @* on your tunic.
Mr. Vegetable, are you able to now distinguish between an FMJ round that is optimized for the military and a the more powerful hollow points it is recommended that civilians use for defense?
Sir, I have to test not only your comprehension, because the info has been provided, but your knowledge just tone certain you are intellectually capable of participating and giving meaningful contributions to the topic.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑20% of your last 20 threads are tributes...*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ BV thinks 9 mm FMJ should be banned because it was optimized for combat. I say let's support him. I mean, how many of you actually carry FMJ for defense? The cheap round is good for the range.
ANd we still get to carry our more powerful defense rounds that hare hollow points, +P, and polymer.
Thanks BV for allowing us the more power round. Although he is speaking of an actual firearm he now claims he meant the round.
Here are the links.
*Huey » Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie? Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat. And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.
BV's reply:
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.
Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480
Just applying your logic.
AND:
BV' reply to the edited post:
You've been told.
But now you must resolve whether you continue to confuse it with a weapon or a round....
viewtopic.php?p=2777320#p2777320
To me...

One of your fans asked me to forward this tribute...*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 5:02 am » wrote: ↑
Mr Blacvkvegetable, that is a Henry Big Boy 45 Long Colt. The rounds it uses and the weapon itself was optimized for combat. Using your logic, LIKE the 9 mil, it is inappropriate for civilian use.
Fortunately in this country federal law is not retroactive and I a ban was ever successful mine would be grandfathered in.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑20% of your last 20 threads are tributes...*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑ BV thinks 9 mm FMJ should be banned because it was optimized for combat. I say let's support him. I mean, how many of you actually carry FMJ for defense? The cheap round is good for the range.
ANd we still get to carry our more powerful defense rounds that hare hollow points, +P, and polymer.
Thanks BV for allowing us the more power round. Although he is speaking of an actual firearm he now claims he meant the round.
Here are the links.
*Huey » Yesterday, 2:26 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 2:26 pm
Which part is the lie? Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat. And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.
BV's reply:
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.
Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
viewtopic.php?p=2765480#p2765480
Just applying your logic.
AND:
BV' reply to the edited post:
You've been told.
But now you must resolve whether you continue to confuse it with a weapon or a round....
viewtopic.php?p=2777320#p2777320
To me...

Mr. Vegetable, GOOD MORNING. I hope you enjoyed your rest. That is interesting. Doesn't really make sense, but it is interesting.Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 5:12 am » wrote: ↑One of your fans asked me to forward this tribute...*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 5:02 am » wrote: ↑
Mr Blacvkvegetable, that is a Henry Big Boy 45 Long Colt. The rounds it uses and the weapon itself was optimized for combat. Using your logic, LIKE the 9 mil, it is inappropriate for civilian use.
Fortunately in this country federal law is not retroactive and I a ban was ever successful mine would be grandfathered in.
https://i.postimg.cc/RVk8j15X/HOOEYVAGINA.jpg
Quimmie,*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑ Mr. Vegetable, GOOD MORNING. I hope you enjoyed your rest. That is interesting. Doesn't really make sense, but it is interesting.
Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 5:35 am » wrote: ↑Quimmie,*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑ Mr. Vegetable, GOOD MORNING. I hope you enjoyed your rest. That is interesting. Doesn't really make sense, but it is interesting.
You ALWAYS run.
What do you believe you are waiting for?
Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 5:40 am » wrote: ↑What do you believe you are waiting for?
If it was a non government agency, like the DNC itself and the Clinton campaign, you would be correct. BUT the allegations are the administration was involved, meaning the FED GOV was involved in attempting to influence an election.Buck » wrote:
so they made up a story about their political rival what’s the big deal?
*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ Sir, one of my facts is that I see the good in everyone. Even scoundrels like you. I am waiting for you to display honesty and character. I know you have it in you.
Mr Vegetable, the purpose of you post escapes me. Perhaps you would be kind enough to post the link. Is there something you are hiding?Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ Sir, one of my facts is that I see the good in everyone. Even scoundrels like you. I am waiting for you to display honesty and character. I know you have it in you.
LowPoint, please..

Apply your interpretive chops, Verbal.
*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑Mr Vegetable, the purpose of you post escapes me. Perhaps you would be kind enough to post the link. Is there something you are hiding?Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 5:49 am » wrote: ↑ Sir, one of my facts is that I see the good in everyone. Even scoundrels like you. I am waiting for you to display honesty and character. I know you have it in you.
LowPoint, please..
Sir, the following is a the M9 Berretta. It used to be military issue for Avn Crewmembers, Tankers, officers, etc and those who did not carry an M16 in combat. Using your logic it is not appropriate for civilian use.
While I don't own that one I do have MANY years of shooting expert with it.
This is entertaining, Mr Vegetable. Even you can't explain the purpose of your post.Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑Apply your interpretive chops, Verbal.
That's a lie.*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑
This is entertaining, Mr Vegetable. Even you can't explain the purpose of your post.
Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 6:30 am » wrote: ↑That's a lie.*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑
This is entertaining, Mr Vegetable. Even you can't explain the purpose of your post.
But let's find out what, exactly, has you confused.
Let's begin with
Are photographs admissible as evidence?