Liberal Forum

Damm how sloppy they never burned them, release it all now!   lol this is gonna be good


https://www.foxnews.com/politics/patel- ... t-room-fbi

BuckNaked » 30 Jul 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 1:26 pm

Damm how sloppy they never burned them, release it all now!   lol this is gonna be good

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/patel- ... t-room-fbi

Too funny. TRUMP has destroyed the democrat party. No reporting of this at this time from abc, or cbs, or cnn, or nbc,  ect.
 

"Just think about this," Patel told Rogan. "Me, as director of the FBI, the former 'Russiagate guy,' when I first got to the bureau, found a room that Comey and others hid from the world in the Hoover Building, full of documents and computer hard drives that no one had ever seen or heard of. Locked the key and hid access and just said, 'No one's ever gonna find this place.'"  

 

Nixon was not at this level. This is a whole other level. Nixon spied, same thing Obama did to Trump. This is a frame job for insurrection one of the few things that can keep you from being eligible to be president, Thats why they needed Jan 6 to be an insurrection.

MR-7 » 30 Jul 2025, 1:46 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 1:46 pm

Nixon was not at this level. This is a whole other level. Nixon spied, same thing Obama did to Trump. This is a frame job for insurrection one of the few things that can keep you from being eligible to be president, Thats why they needed Jan 6 to be an insurrection.

 

Can I say it?  Can I say it?


THIS IS WORSE THAN WATERGATE!

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 1:54 pm

Can I say it?  Can I say it?

THIS IS WORSE THAN WATERGATE!

By FAR....obama will pay for the Anti-TRUMP "COUP". I'm all for impeachment and exile. 

MR-7 » 30 Jul 2025, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 1:59 pm

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 1:54 pm

Can I say it?  Can I say it?

THIS IS WORSE THAN WATERGATE!

By FAR....obama will pay for the Anti-TRUMP "COUP". I'm all for impeachment and exile. 

 

For now I just wan a transparent investigation.

BuckNaked » 30 Jul 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 1:26 pm

Damm how sloppy they never burned them, release it all now!   lol this is gonna be good

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/patel- ... t-room-fbi

:rofl:   :die:   :rofl:   :die:  

*Huey » 30 Jul 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 1:54 pm

Can I say it?  Can I say it?

THIS IS WORSE THAN WATERGATE!

Of course you can say it....


You WILL run from it, but you can certainly say it.
 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 4:39 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 4:39 pm

Of course you can say it....

You WILL run from it, but you can certainly say it.

Speaking of you running ...


1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Blackvegetable » 30 Jul 2025, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 4:37 pm

     

The fbi left incrementing evidence in the FBI?   

BuckNaked » 30 Jul 2025, 9:18 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 9:18 pm

The fbi left incrementing evidence in the FBI?

In Durham's luggage.

At some point, don't you feel a little ashamed being this **** stupid?
 

Vegas » 30 Jul 2025, 4:40 pm » wrote: ↑

30 Jul 2025, 4:40 pm

Speaking of running ...since November 2022...

viewtopic.php?p=2166697#p2166697


you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you. 

Nauseating coward.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 5:10 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 5:10 am

In Durham's luggage.

At some point, don't you feel a little ashamed being this **** stupid?

How can Wray be so sloppy?

BuckNaked » 31 Jul 2025, 5:52 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 5:52 am

How can Wray be so sloppy?

How can you be so credulous?

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 5:54 am

How can you be so credulous?

credulous
Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages 
adjective

1. having or showing too great a readiness to believe things.
   "a ceremony staged for credulous tourists"

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 5:54 am

How can you be so credulous?

mkay who should have cleaned up that room?

BuckNaked » 31 Jul 2025, 5:56 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 5:56 am

mkay who should have cleaned up that room?

No, you continue to proceed from Credulity.


 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 6:00 am

No, you continue to proceed from Credulity.

Who supports you?

You're too stupid to fend for yourself, Kameltoe Acolyte. 
 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 6:00 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 6:00 am

No, you continue to proceed from Credulity.

credulity


Dictionary
Definitions from Oxford Languages · 
noun

1. a tendency to be too ready to believe that something is real or true.
   "moneylenders prey upon their credulity and inexperience"