Liberal Forum

Trump fired off a furious Truth Social post on Wednesday after Hawley was the only Republican to vote for a committee bill to ban insider trading on stocks by lawmakers, presidents and vice presidents—and also prevent them from owning stocks. 

“Why would one ‘Republican,’ Senator Josh Hawley from the Great State of Missouri, join with all of the Democrats to block a Review, sponsored by Senator Rick Scott, and with the support of almost all other Republicans, of Nancy Pelosi’s Stock Trading over the last 25 years,“ Trump posted.

Trump claimed information on the congressional stock trading bill was released late “very much like SABOTAGE!” and said Hawley was being used by Democrats “as a pawn to help them.” He then added another slapdown: “I don’t think real Republicans want to see their President, who has had unprecedented success, TARGETED, because of the ‘whims’ of a second-tier Senator named Josh Hawley!”

While the language in the bill seems to suggest the president and vice president would be included in the ban on trading or owning stocks, it has been tweaked to not include Trump or Vice President JD Vance. 

“Well, I think that the president... a number of people who are opposed to banning stock trading had said to the president that he would be covered by the (stock trading) bill, he’d have to sell Mar-a-Lago and sell assets—not the case at all.” 

Hawley explained the assets of Trump and Vance are “totally exempted” from the bill he voted on, before turning his target to former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who they alleged was the “poster child” of trading with insider information.


https://elink.thedailybeast.com/click/4 ... ZXItdHJ1bX


GOP senators reject Trump’s pitch to use tariff revenue for ‘rebates’


https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... bate-plan/
 

Top Generals Nominated for New Positions Must Now Meet With Trump

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/29/us/p ... roid-share



**** dumpster fire.

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:24 am

Trump fired off a furious Truth Social post on Wednesday after Hawley was the only Republican to vote for a committee bill to ban insider trading on stocks by lawmakers, presidents and vice presidents—and also prevent them from owning stocks. 

“Why would one ‘Republican,’ Senator Josh Hawley from the Great State of Missouri, join with all of the Democrats to block a Review, sponsored by Senator Rick Scott, and with the support of almost all other Republicans, of Nancy Pelosi’s Stock Trading over the last 25 years,“ Trump posted.

Trump claimed information on the congressional stock trading bill was released late “very much like SABOTAGE!” and said Hawley was being used by Democrats “as a pawn to help them.” He then added another slapdown: “I don’t think real Republicans want to see their President, who has had unprecedented success, TARGETED, because of the ‘whims’ of a second-tier Senator named Josh Hawley!”

While the language in the bill seems to suggest the president and vice president would be included in the ban on trading or owning stocks, it has been tweaked to not include Trump or Vice President JD Vance. 

“Well, I think that the president... a number of people who are opposed to banning stock trading had said to the president that he would be covered by the (stock trading) bill, he’d have to sell Mar-a-Lago and sell assets—not the case at all.” 

Hawley explained the assets of Trump and Vance are “totally exempted” from the bill he voted on, before turning his target to former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who they alleged was the “poster child” of trading with insider information.

https://elink.thedailybeast.com/click/4 ... ZXItdHJ1bX

GOP senators reject Trump’s pitch to use tariff revenue for ‘rebates’

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business ... bate-plan/
 

Top Generals Nominated for New Positions Must Now Meet With Trump

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/29/us/p ... roid-share

**** dumpster fire.

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
 

Vegas » 31 Jul 2025, 9:46 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:46 am

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion

 

November, 2022
 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 9:49 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:49 am

November, 2022

And? I still don't see your answer you ignorant clueless moron. 

Vegas » 31 Jul 2025, 9:51 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:51 am

And? I still don't see your answer you ignorant clueless moron.

After which you demanded a definition, in my own words...

A definition you spent months misrepresenting, and then crudely grafting to your lie.

It is time for you to humble yourself before everyone....

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 9:55 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:55 am

After which you demanded a definition, in my own words...

A definition you spent months misrepresenting, and then crudely grafting to your lie.

It is time for you to humble yourself before everyone....

Jesus. Your cowardice never ends. Yes, that was years ago. This is another question. But you already know that. 

STFU and give an answer...and **** your non-answers and **** your deflections. 


 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 8:24 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 8:24 am

**** dumpster fire.

the Democratic Party? you're **** right (for once)...

Vegas » 31 Jul 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:57 am

Jesus. Your cowardice never ends. Yes, that was years ago. This is another question. But you already know that. 

STFU and give an answer...and **** your non-answers and **** your deflections.

sure looks to be a **** YOU...generally speaking...  
 

ROG62 » 31 Jul 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:14 am

Vegas » 31 Jul 2025, 9:57 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 9:57 am

Jesus. Your cowardice never ends. Yes, that was years ago. This is another question. But you already know that. 

STFU and give an answer...and **** your non-answers and **** your deflections.

sure looks to be a **** YOU...generally speaking...  
 

 

Hey ROG, you figure out what has the OP starters tight whites in a twist?  

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:16 am

Hey ROG, you figure out what has the OP starters tight whites in a twist?

A Rule 20...  

https://gallagherdefense.com/criminal-d ... efense-mn/

ROG62 » 31 Jul 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:14 am

sure looks to be a **** YOU...generally speaking...

   

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:16 am

Hey ROG, you figure out what has the OP starters tight whites in a twist?

In veggie's world "name calling = facts"

That filthy Mfer veggie doesn't know what facts are because he's an asshole baby.

I wish that **** prick would stop with the name calling.

Did I prove my point?          
 

ROG62 » 31 Jul 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:20 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:16 am

Hey ROG, you figure out what has the OP starters tight whites in a twist?

A Rule 20...  

https://gallagherdefense.com/criminal-d ... efense-mn/

 

This morning I gave him a link to better help.com and a link that listed therapists in Salem Nh, as well as a map to their locations.

I hope he takes the hint.

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:27 am

This morning I gave him a link to better help.com and a link that listed therapists in Salem Nh, as well as a map to their locations.

I hope he takes the hint.

What did they have to say about your "Beach ******" and "Your mom was a whore" series?

Did they mention Travis Bickle?
 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:33 am

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:27 am

This morning I gave him a link to better help.com and a link that listed therapists in Salem Nh, as well as a map to their locations.

I hope he takes the hint.

What did they have to say about your "Beach ******" and "Your mom was a whore" series?

Did they mention Travis Bickle?
 

 

While that is a low point for me when I posted out I was simply following the standards set by you almost 8 years ago they understood.

 

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:56 am

While that is a low point for me 

Don't be so modest

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 12:29 pm

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 10:56 am

While that is a low point for me when I posted out I was simply following the standards set by you almost 8 years ago they understood.
 

Don't be so modest

 

Mr Vegetable, once again you forgot some of the important points of the post that show you are as complicit as I was when it comes to family insults.

Sir you look at my posts. I have not attacked the family of others until they have attacked mine, like you.  Then gloves are oof.  Some can handle what they started, others, like you, cry and whine and hide when the bricks are thrown back.

I would to add one thing before I end this portion of the convo.  Yesterday morning you went after my family yet I showed how a man reacts.  Didn't work for you.  Good Luck.  You are just an average white boy living an average life living on a modest income.  

*Huey » 31 Jul 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 12:35 pm

Mr Vegetable, once again 

Tiny,

I don't care about your rationalizations. 

 

Blackvegetable » 31 Jul 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 1:04 pm

Tiny,

I don't care about your rationalizations.

Likewise. Especially you rationalizing prediction 4. 



1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 31 Jul 2025, 1:21 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Jul 2025, 1:21 pm

Likewise. Especially you rationalizing prediction 4. 


 

November,  2022..


It's time.