Liberal Forum

US Adds Just 73,000 Jobs as Unemployment Rate Rises

• US adds 73,000 jobs, trailing estimates
•  Payrolls for prior month revised sharply downward
•  Jobless rate rises even as more leave workforce
•  Treasury yields slide; stock futures fall

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/live-blo ... e-americas

"B...b...b...b...but Biduhn....downward revisions!"

"Common Sense!"

"This economy!"

So **** g'ddammned stupid 
 
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:44 am

US Adds Just 73,000 Jobs as Unemployment Rate Rises

• US adds 73,000 jobs, trailing estimates
•  Payrolls for prior month revised sharply downward
•  Jobless rate rises even as more leave workforce
•  Treasury yields slide; stock futures fall

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/live-blo ... e-americas

"B...b...b...b...but Biduhn....downward revisions!"

"Common Sense!"

"This economy!"

So **** g'ddammned stupid

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.

Either A, B, C, or D.

Let me break this down for your dumb ***. You see the 4 options to the question? Every option includes your definition, but only one is an example of survivorship bias. Your definition was half assed. Like all of your content.

When a sample fails to reflect "mortality" in the population being examined.

or

"Sampling error"

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Vegas » 01 Aug 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:29 am

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." 

November,  2022.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:30 am

November,  2022.

Again, so? 

Vegas » 01 Aug 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:32 am

Again, so?

Nearly 3 years ago.

You're due.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:34 am

Nearly 3 years ago.

You're due.

Due for what? Use your words. 

Vegas » 01 Aug 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:34 am

Due for what? Use your words.

The humiliation you've worked hard to earn.

Acknowledge that you were answered..

 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:37 am

The humiliation you've worked hard to earn.

Acknowledge that you were answered..

I was? Oh please show me. Show us.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 9:37 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 9:37 am

The humiliation you've worked hard to earn.

Acknowledge that you were answered..

@Buck Naked  @Johnny You   Is this true? I must have missed his answer. Have either of you come across it yet? I have come across an avalanche of his deflections and evasions. I have come across what he doesn't think the answer is. But I haven't seen what he thinks the answer is as of yet. 

If you guys can come across it, please show me. Then I can stop with this question. 

The pannikins back April said Trump tariffs were killing the stock market. Wrong again. Your Fake propaganda is ignored now.

PhiloBeddo » 01 Aug 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 10:42 am

The pannikins back April said Trump tariffs were killing the stock market. Wrong again. Your Fake propaganda is ignored now.

So, Phil, when you spoke of "this economy", is this the economy to which you were referring?

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 8:44 am

US Adds Just 73,000 Jobs as Unemployment Rate Rises

• US adds 73,000 jobs, trailing estimates
•  Payrolls for prior month revised sharply downward
•  Jobless rate rises even as more leave workforce
•  Treasury yields slide; stock futures fall

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/live-blo ... e-americas

"B...b...b...b...but Biduhn....downward revisions!"

"Common Sense!"

"This economy!"

So **** g'ddammned stupid

9% inflation
And 10 million illegals flooding the country......

Was that stupid?
 

HarperLee » 01 Aug 2025, 11:37 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 11:37 am

9% inflation
And 10 million illegals flooding the country......

Was that stupid?

It would be, were it self-inflicted.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 11:17 am

PhiloBeddo » 01 Aug 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 10:42 am

The pannikins back April said Trump tariffs were killing the stock market. Wrong again. Your Fake propaganda is ignored now.

So, Phil, when you spoke of "this economy", is this the economy to which you were referring?

 

Mr Vegetable, far be it for me to correct a self described superior being, but that would not be be Phil. That would be PHILO.  Philo Beddoe is the main character in the movie any which way but loose and sequels.  You can google who portrays him.  

With respect I do think you would have been excellent in the role of Clyde.

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 12:14 pm

Mr Vegetable, far be it for me to correct a self described superior being, but that would not be be Phil. That would be PHILO.  Philo Beddoe is the main character in the movie any which way but loose and sequels.  You can google who portrays him.  

With respect I do think you would have been excellent in the role of Clyde.

Mr. Vegetable is a bit perturbed because posters do not want to be spammed by him every 5 minutes as he seeks attention.

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 12:19 pm

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 12:14 pm

Mr Vegetable, far be it for me to correct a self described superior being, but that would not be be Phil. That would be PHILO.  Philo Beddoe is the main character in the movie any which way but loose and sequels.  You can google who portrays him.  

With respect I do think you would have been excellent in the role of Clyde.

Mr. Vegetable is a bit perturbed because posters do not want to be spammed by him every 5 minutes as he seeks attention.

I hope you understood your error.

Sir, consider it penance for your past sins and transgressions.  Nothing is stopping you from doing the same things.

Mr. Vegetable there is a difference between tagging people in threads where they are not participating and QUOTING them in threads where THEY ARE PARTICIPATING.

Nod if you understand.  Although I fear you don't understand.
 

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 12:24 pm

I hope you understood our error.


 

How many of you are there?

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 12:25 pm

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 12:24 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 12:24 pm

I hope you understood our error.



 

How many of you are there?

 

Thank You, Mr Veggie, for pointing out my typo.  The error has been corrected.

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm

Thank You, Mr Veggie, for pointing out my typo.  The error has been corrected.

Maybe you should pay closer attention..

Make your crap worth the effort of reading it.
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Aug 2025, 1:35 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 1:35 pm

*Huey » 01 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Aug 2025, 12:29 pm

Thank You, Mr Veggie, for pointing out my typo.  The error has been corrected.

Maybe you should pay closer attention..


 

 

I have already addressed that, Sir,  Chance are you edited the post in the reply and you missed the reason why.  Mr. Vegetable, I humbly suggest if anyone needs to py closer attention it would be you.  You are demanding I, and others, repost things because you either edited the quote or did not read it.

PS.  I removed the effluvium from your rely.