Your ignorance truly has no bounds, does it asshole?Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2025, 3:20 pm » wrote: ↑ Your source gloated that Trump's tariffs are an "act of economic self-harm" and said that "Australia will be able to seize trade opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region."
The "absorbing" of the "impact" of the tariffs referred to stealing our business and eating our lunch, you dummy.
You get all victorious over stupid ****. It's a recurring theme with you.
Right now, they're in "face-saving mode", attempting to prove they can stand up to Trump and won't accept his new tariffs.roadkill » 14 Aug 2025, 3:19 pm » wrote: ↑ What happens when these other countries start realizing what Trump has identified?
Do these other countries think things will suddenly get better after their Trump tantrum?
Oh, it DOESN'T say Australia is going to pay the tariffs, huh? Can't you read English, you buffoon? Here, let me try to help:Cannonpointer » 14 Aug 2025, 3:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You are genuinely this dimwitted?
Your link says that Australia's PM is planning to kick our *** in the Asia-Pacific, replacing US producers when asian countries impose retaliatory tariffs. It doesn't say the Australian government is going to pay our tariffs. It says they are going to steal our customers.
You're an idiot.
Home Depot will dump products rather than surge prices. Or so they claim.
Okay. American consumers will lose choices AND dollars because of the tariffs.
Bully for you, son.
Don't you mean more stupid "proof"?
So they are going to "absorb the costs" of tariffs on the "American made ingredients." You are presenting an outlier that has no numbers. It could be a pure PR ploy. Just what ice cream ingredients does this Chapman person get from the US? You don't know and neither do I.
Meaningless and stupid.
The "initial few who" make no sense whatsoever.
You don't understand your own sources. Australia said it was going to kick Trump's ***, and you thought Australia said it was going to lick Trump's ***. You think an obvious PR campaign by some minor league, off-brand ice cream maker - no numbers - is relevant, and you think a meangless statement by home depot about not "broadly" raising prices proves the tariffs will come from anywhere by American consumers. Never having run a business, you do not understand tariffs. They're a tax on consumers - PERIOD. Not a tax on water fowl, on cantaloupes, on countries, or on rainbows. They are a tax on consumers - period.
Son, you are truly retarded.
"race to the bottom" Isn't that the playbook the dems are using?Zeets2 » 15 Aug 2025, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑ Right now, they're in "face-saving mode", attempting to prove they can stand up to Trump and won't accept his new tariffs.
That will change in due course, as they see alternative markets drying up rapidly as every other country tries to do the same thing, causing a "race to the bottom" on prices! That's what happens when you lose the largest, wealthiest, and most powerful market on the face of the earth, while trying to convince your populace that those lost sales can somehow be made up by making a deal for a couple of million dollars to a country like Sri Lanka or Nambia. They're scrambling now to try to find a way to replace tens of billions in sales that they find are not being sold to the US as their docks are packed tight with unsold goods. China has already devalued their Yuan, which in effect is the reality that they've been forced to absorb the tariffs.
And the move Trump's made to postpone the highest tariffs for another 90 days is a brilliant strategy by Trump. Picture that fight restarting in early November, just 8 weeks before Christmas which is ALWAYS a huge percentage of China's sales every year. In that time, Trump knows that he'll secure new trade deals with at least a dozen more countries, leaving China to watch as the parade passes them by, mounting the pressure on China to reach an agreement with Trump.
Trump has the world over a barrel, and ignorant libs can't stand the thought of Trump succeeding once again!
Yeah, but THEY'RE hoping that it's the US economy that's being crushed and destroyed, not our strength we're showing we have on the world's market!roadkill » 15 Aug 2025, 11:22 am » wrote: ↑ "race to the bottom" Isn't that the playbook the dems are using?
Zeets2 » 15 Aug 2025, 11:54 am » wrote: ↑ Yeah, but THEY'RE hoping that it's the US economy that's being crushed and destroyed, not our strength we're showing we have on the world's market!
Cannonpointer » 06 Aug 2025, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑ Mexico and Canada are bypassing the US for trade, using Atlantic ports.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jAAHAnhMzxc
No, I thank YOU for your empty brained posting causing me to respond with a post which received POTD and a thousand greenies.
Psst.Zeets2 » 15 Aug 2025, 10:47 am » wrote: ↑ Your ignorance truly has no bounds, does it asshole?
There is NOTHING in the Australian response to the Trump tariffs that indicate they WILL be able to find and seize new trade opportunities instead of the US anywhere else!
Read the next sentence, you loud, stupid cow. It makes clear that the "impact of Trump's tariffs" will be LOST MARKETS. The target countries will impose retaliatory tariffs, and Australia will get new customers for its UN-tariffed products.Zeets2 » 15 Aug 2025, 11:18 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, it DOESN'T say Australia is going to pay the tariffs, huh? Can't you read English, you buffoon? Here, let me try to help:
Australia is ready to absorb the impact of tariffs decided by U.S. President Donald Trump, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Tuesday.
The dea and cia run the cartels, you stupid girl.roadkill » 15 Aug 2025, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑ Does this mean Commida and Nazico will have to sell more Fentanyl to make ends meet?
I swear, you're as gullible as the dumbest peons who believe every word a politician tells you, WITHOUT THEM TELLING YOU EXACTLY WHERE IN THE **** WORLD THEY WILL FIND A TRADING PARTNER AS LARGE AND AS WEALTHY AS THE US?Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2025, 6:11 pm » wrote: ↑ Read the next sentence, you loud, stupid cow. It makes clear that the "impact of Trump's tariffs" will be LOST MARKETS. The target countries will impose retaliatory tariffs, and Australia will get new customers for its UN-tariffed products.
You really, truly ARE that stupid. Just wow. Even when I SHOW IT TO YOU, you cling to your masturbation.
No, jackass, you're not obliged to do anything! Least of all, continuing to spew your idiotic economic theories after they've been proven wrong for the past 4 months! So who is it that looks stupid now, fool?Cannonpointer » 15 Aug 2025, 6:08 pm » wrote: ↑ Psst.
Jackass.
You thought the Australian government was going to absorb the tariffs.
In truth, they CLAIMED they would absorb American markets.
I am not obliged to opine on what their chances are, you loudly stupid ****. I am merely correcting YOU on their actual statement, ya retarded child.
Try your cheap "look - a squirrel!" tricks on someone about your own intelligence.
So tell us, stupid. How many months AFTER they've been paying the Trump tariff will it take before you accept the fact that "absorbing the Trump tariff" is not simply something that Australia has merely claimed?'Not the act of a friend': Australia angry over Trump tariffs
2 April 2025 Katy Watson and Yang Tian BBC News, Sydney
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese called the measure "totally unwarranted", but said the nation would not introduce its own tariffs - also known as import taxes - in return.
Opposition leader Peter Dutton said the tariffs were a "bad day" for Australia and would be a "significant impost" on jobs across the nation.
However, the prime minister said Australia would not be retaliating on US goods.
"We will not join a race to the bottom that leads to higher prices and slower growth," he said.
But he warned the tariffs would have consequences for how Australians see ties with the US, and that the country would resort to formal "dispute resolution mechanisms" contained in its free trade agreement with the US if necessary.
During his "Liberation Day" speech, Trump pointed to Australia's ban on fresh beef from the US - which was introduced in 2003, after cases of mad cow disease, an infectious neurological illness, were discovered in North America.
"They're wonderful people and wonderful everything, but they ban American beef," he said.
"They don't want it because they don't want it to affect their farmers."
"I don't blame them, but we're doing the same thing right now," Trump added.
It's very telling how much they hate this country, all because their incompetent whore lost the election!roadkill » 15 Aug 2025, 12:36 pm » wrote: ↑ The dems have always hoped for our country to fail so they could attack someone other than themselves.
The link you presented did not say what you thought. You're stupid.Zeets2 » 16 Aug 2025, 12:22 pm » wrote: ↑ I swear, you're as gullible as the dumbest peons who believe every word a politician tells you, WITHOUT THEM TELLING YOU EXACTLY WHERE IN THE **** WORLD THEY WILL FIND A TRADING PARTNER AS LARGE AND AS WEALTHY AS THE US?
That is simply incorrect. Anyone (except you) can read your link and actually understand it.Zeets2 » 16 Aug 2025, 12:35 pm » wrote: ↑ No, jackass, you're not obliged to do anything! Least of all, continuing to spew your idiotic economic theories after they've been proven wrong for the past 4 months! So who is it that looks stupid now, fool?
But since you can't deny what has been claimed, and the fact is that since April, Australia HAS BEEN ABSORBING THE 10% TRUMP TARIFF, AND THEY ARE NOT RETALIATING WITH RECIPROCAL TARIFFS ON THE US, ARE THEY YOU **** MORON?:
Don't forget..Cannonpointer » 07 Aug 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ No ****. It's even MORE in Putin's interest to end the war through all-out victory.
Which is exactly what he will do unless NATO grows a dick and gets on the floor.
Which leaves China off-leash and growing.
The western pedophiles are damned if they do and damned if they don't.
They fell into one of the seven classic blunders, the most famous of which is "Never get involved in a land war in Asia." Only slightly LESS famous is this:
No, wait. That is the actual blunder - the most famous one. Jeez Louise, they really ARE **** retarded. The fell for the MOST famous classic blunder.
JohnnyYou » 16 Aug 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't forget..
America has The Ghost Busters
music.youtube /watch?v=TaV1r341wYk&si=Ai4HS7w1ikuo3Bdn
Oh, it's incorrect, is it?Cannonpointer » 16 Aug 2025, 2:06 pm » wrote: ↑ That is simply incorrect. Anyone (except you) can read your link and actually understand it.
Enough, you screeching ***.
Consumers pay 100% of tariffs.
Go chase squirrels.
So if your stupid theory was correct, then why did Australia respond with these words:However, the prime minister said Australia would not be retaliating on US goods.
"We will not join a race to the bottom that leads to higher prices and slower growth," he said.
Care to explain them, you **** moron? If AMERICANS were paying that tax on Australian goods, then why would that be any imposition at all for their nation?Opposition leader Peter Dutton said the tariffs were a "bad day" for Australia and would be a "significant impost" on jobs across the nation.
If you're dumb enough to think what you just presented is "evidence" that Australia is paying the tariffs for producers, just keep thinking that, ya gay retard.Zeets2 » 17 Aug 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑ Oh, it's incorrect, is it?
Did you skip over this quote made by the Australian government as they reluctantly accept the fact that they will pay the Trump tariff and deny there will be any in-kind tariff retaliation?:
So if your stupid theory was correct, then why did Australia respond with these words:
Care to explain them, you **** moron? If AMERICANS were paying that tax on Australian goods, then why would that be any imposition at all for their nation?
Why would it have been such a bad day for them to see Americans paying higher taxes? It sure as hell doesn't make it a bad day for Americans if Australia is simply paying more in taxes, does it? I guarantee that most Americans couldn't give two ****!
Scratch your empty head for a while and try to come up with some response that doesn't make you look even dumber than you already do, moron!