Liberal Forum

Gabbard overrode CIA officials’ concerns in push to release classified Russia report
CIA officials worried that the release of a House report on 2016 Russian election meddling could reveal top-secret spying techniques and sources, but Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard authorized a lightly redacted version with President Trump’s blessing.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... cia-trump/



Blabby Gabby...

 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:12 am

Gabbard overrode CIA officials’ concerns in push to release classified Russia report
CIA officials worried that the release of a House report on 2016 Russian election meddling could reveal top-secret spying techniques and sources, but Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard authorized a lightly redacted version with President Trump’s blessing.


https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... cia-trump/



Blabby Gabby...

 

 

I notice you are not disputing the information.

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:24 am

I notice you are not disputing the information.

To what "information" do you refer?

Please be concise.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:27 am

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 7:24 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:24 am

I notice you are not disputing the information.

To what "information" do you refer?

Please be concise.

Do you agree to answer questions on one for one basis? If not, my point is made.  Thanks.
 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:29 am

Do you agree to answer questions on one for one basis? If not, my point is made.  Thanks.

You can stop projecting and post the information to which you make vague reference. 

Or we will proceed on the assumption that it is yet another empty slogan.
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 7:32 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:32 am

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:29 am

Do you agree to answer questions on one for one basis? If not, my point is made.  Thanks.

You can stop projecting and post the information to which you make vague reference. 

Or we will proceed on the assumption that it is yet another empty slogan.
 

 

Right to the source.  No need for me to provide narrative.  You claim you can read:

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/ ... 0-pr-18-25

Acknowledge you have been answered.  

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:16 am

Right to the source.  No need for me to provide narrative.  You claim you can read:

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/ ... 0-pr-18-25

Acknowledge you have been answered.

No, Tiny.

That is a dodge...

That isn't the information.

I said that you should be "concise", Coward.
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 8:20 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:20 am

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 8:16 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:16 am

Right to the source.  No need for me to provide narrative.  You claim you can read:

https://www.dni.gov/index.php/newsroom/ ... 0-pr-18-25

Acknowledge you have been answered.

No, Tiny.

That is a dodge...

That isn't the information.

I said that you should be "concise", Coward.
 

 

SOrry, Mr. Vegetable, I accept your admission that you are unable to read.  I am not going to provide it for you.  You have the info, you keep running.  

Bye.

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:22 am

SOrry, Mr. Vegetable, I accept your admission that you are unable to read.  I am not going to provide it for you.  You have the info, you keep running.  

Bye.

your lying cowardly *** has been stripped naked again.
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:22 am

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 8:22 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:22 am

SOrry, Mr. Vegetable, I accept your admission that you are unable to read.  I am not going to provide it for you.  You have the info, you keep running.  

Bye.

your lying cowardly *** has been stripped naked again.
 

 

You have the link to the info.  You have to decide RIGHT now whether you want narrative. of not want narrative.

I am out until you answer that and acknowledge you have the info you requested.

As far as a being a coward you have my address, my pic and my name.  You may call me a coward when you provide the same and come no down and talk to me within arms length.

PS.  Careful what you say.  Using the search function I found at least two posts where you were given that info.  

 

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:25 am

You have the link to the info.  

This is what you do.

You make vague assertions then invite me to dig your "case" out of reams of text.


Because you're a slogan yapping coward.

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 8:28 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:28 am

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 8:25 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:25 am

You have the link to the info.  

This is what you do.

You make vague assertions then invite me to dig your "case" out of reams of text.


Because you're a slogan yapping coward.

 

I'm sorry.  You once again disingenuously deleted the majority of my post.  Gotta go.

*Huey » 07 Aug 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 8:30 am

I'm sorry.  You once again disingenuously deleted the majority of my post.  Gotta go.

Because there is nothing in it worth reading.

Nod.
 

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 7:12 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 7:12 am

Gabbard overrode CIA officials’ concerns in push to release classified Russia report
CIA officials worried that the release of a House report on 2016 Russian election meddling could reveal top-secret spying techniques and sources, but Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard authorized a lightly redacted version with President Trump’s blessing.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national ... cia-trump/

Blabby Gabby...

Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.
5. November, 2022.
6. Continue to lie about me posting my definition in my example, while he continues to refuse to read it.

 
 

Vegas » 07 Aug 2025, 9:00 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 9:00 am

Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."

 

#5

Blackvegetable » 07 Aug 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

07 Aug 2025, 10:23 am

#5

#6



Just for you: "**** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up."

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors 

1. "I posted my definition of survivorship bias..." To which I will reply with the usual and the video. 
2. Continue with your step 4 evasion
3. Continue to copy me
4. Continue with non-answers.
5. November, 2022.
6. Continue to lie about me posting my definition in my example, while he continues to refuse to read it.