Liberal Forum

Google AI

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
. 
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial. 
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare. 
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury. 

And that is all there is to say about that.
 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am

Google AI

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
. 
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial. 
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare. 
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury. 

And that is all there is to say about that.

No one has ever claimed that Kaplan "overturned" the jury’s verdict....

This is why morons must NEVER play with AI...

Here's another reason.

The cretinous OP has not only been directed to the full text of Judge Kaplan's filing, but he has been repeatedly invited to confirm what obliged it. While refusing to do so on some principle unarticulated, said cretinous OP delegates the task of reading it to AI.

Had COP bothered to read it, he would be "educated" on the topic of the "special verdict" the idiot labors, but doesn't understand. 


It is important to note that COP is only law, and reading, proximate.

Here's where AI and NoI, collide.

AI is entirely correct in saying Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict.

Because, in his filing which COP did not read, he declined TEAM GRIFTY'S petition to do so.

As OP has invited this *** kicking, I think it is time he told us why Team Grifty asked for relief. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 9:15 am

No one has ever claimed that Kaplan "overturned" the jury’s verdict....

This is why morons must NEVER play with AI...

Here's another reason.

The cretinous OP has not only been directed to the full text of Judge Kaplan's filing, but he has been repeatedly invited to confirm what obliged it. While refusing to do so on some principle unarticulated, said cretinous OP delegates the task of reading it to AI.

Had COP bothered to read it, he would be "educated" on the topic of the "special verdict" the idiot labors, but doesn't understand. 

It is important to note that COP is only law, and reading, proximate.

 

phoenix 68 avatar phoenix 68 -1 3 minutes ago

I don't care if you cry like a bish, but sweep up his remains...

ROG62 » 4 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

4 minutes ago

Go pick up the broken pieces of your little buddy...

Hueycide by AI.

The Essence of NotReading...

In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial


:die:  

 

And that is all there is to say about that. 

About time....


 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am

Google AI

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
. 
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial. 
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare. 
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury. 

And that is all there is to say about that.

Smoke one of Rudy's cigars and fuhgettaboutit.

Blackvegetable » 29 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

29 minutes ago

Go pick up the broken pieces of your little buddy...

The king's men are out of horses..   Hegseth and Noam stole a bunch of money.

Hoompty Dooty is gone like a freight train. Honor is second besty to corruption. All the Thieves have Nihlism.

The cost per deportee is going to sky rocket with 50,000$ sign on bonuses for nimwit patrols
 
 

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 9:15 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am

Google AI

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
. 
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial. 
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare. 
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury. 

And that is all there is to say about that.

No one has ever claimed that Kaplan "overturned" the jury’s verdict....

This is why morons must NEVER play with AI...

Here's another reason.

The cretinous OP has not only been directed to the full text of Judge Kaplan's filing, but he has been repeatedly invited to confirm what obliged it. While refusing to do so on some principle unarticulated, said cretinous OP delegates the task of reading it to AI.

Had COP bothered to read it, he would be "educated" on the topic of the "special verdict" the idiot labors, but doesn't understand. 


It is important to note that COP is only law, and reading, proximate.

 

Thank you , Thank You, Thank You, Mr. Vegetable.  In your own words you agree that Kaplan did ot overturn the verdict MEANING that Trump wa not found liable for rape.

The jury verdict stands. 

Ps.  That meltdown of a post was one step away for being PGd.  But you stayed on TOPIC just enough to avoid that. 

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 9:32 am

The Essence of NotReading...

In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial

No ****, Sherlock.  That is the point.  That is why I posted it.  Sir, this is not the big gotcha moment you think its.

*Huey » 13 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

13 minutes ago

Thank you , Thank You, Thank You, Mr. Vegetable.  In your own words you agree that Kaplan did ot overturn the verdict MEANING that Trump wa not found liable for rape.

The jury verdict stands. 

Ps.  That meltdown of a post was one step away for being PGd.  But you stayed on TOPIC just enough to avoid that.

You are impenetrably **** stupid.....

Who asked Judge Kaplan to overturn the Jury's vedict?

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:07 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 9:56 am

Thank you , Thank You, Thank You, Mr. Vegetable.  In your own words you agree that Kaplan did ot overturn the verdict MEANING that Trump wa not found liable for rape.

The jury verdict stands. 

Ps.  That meltdown of a post was one step away for being PGd.  But you stayed on TOPIC just enough to avoid that.

You are impenetrably **** stupid.....

Who asked Judge Kaplan to overturn the Jury's vedict?

 

Not relevant. Post it again and straight to PG.  Or you can make a point.  YOU CALL, StandLess Wonder.

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 9:32 am

The Essence of NotReading...

In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial

I asked AI  “ is sexual abuse a form of rape”

it said “An AI Overview is not available for this search”   

 

Mrkelly » 10 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

10 minutes ago

I asked AI  “ is sexual abuse a form of rape”

it said “An AI Overview is not available for this search” 

She don't touch.. In that regard Shoove is right, she ain't got no soul like a big legged woman. I have gotten the "Go Away" Troll face palm too. Even shows a picture of a dragon phishing..  I saved it, I could share it..  But you know...


I asked her "What degree does Lutnick have" She say " BS from Harvard"  the first time.  I asked did he get a Masters degree. She came back and said no all he has is a BS in Economics from Haverford University..  She is close enough for Rudy's cigars and Monica would not trust her with a 10 ft Arnold Palmer.

So is Huey saying Trump has to pay E Jean for grabbing her by the ******?   Hell, if that's against the law I owe some people here billions.
 
 

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:09 am

Not relevant. Post it again and direct to PG  Or you can make a point.  YOU CALL, StandLess Wonder.

IT OBLIGED KAPLAN'S RESPONSE, YOU **** BRICK!

You really are En Fuego, vato....

Post it again and

You have rules about repetition...

You've never even read this...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

4th and 5th paragraph

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood. 

The filing from Judge Lewis A. Kaplan came as Trump’s attorneys have sought a new trial and have argued that the jury’s $5 million verdict against Trump in the civil suit was excessive. The reason, they argue, is that sexual abuse could be as limited as the “groping” of a victim’s breasts. 

and direct to PG

Naturally, you coward.....you're getting your *** kicked after hanging yourself out to dry.

Or you can make a point.

I have clinically dissected your stupid, quoting you VERBATIM at every turn.....I've anticipated the answers to the questions from which you would run, because they expose you as an impenetrably stupid human being.

That's "making a point without the need for questions".

StandLess Wonder.

Now everyone can see that you know neither the meaning of "stand" nor "case"....
 

Mrkelly » 09 Aug 2025, 10:23 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:23 am

I asked AI  “ is sexual abuse a form of rape”

it said “An AI Overview is not available for this search” 

Well, it doesn't matter what google AI says.  What matters is what NY State law said was rape at the time and the fact Kaplan instructed the jury to use that definition.

Nice try.

Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 10:38 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:38 am

*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 10:09 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 10:09 am

Not relevant. Post it again and direct to PG  Or you can make a point.  YOU CALL, StandLess Wonder.

IT OBLIGED KAPLAN'S RESPONSE, YOU **** BRICK!

You really are En Fuego, vato....

Post it again and

You have rules about repetition...

You've never even read this...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics ... udge-rape/

4th and 5th paragraph

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood. 

The filing from Judge Lewis A. Kaplan came as Trump’s attorneys have sought a new trial and have argued that the jury’s $5 million verdict against Trump in the civil suit was excessive. The reason, they argue, is that sexual abuse could be as limited as the “groping” of a victim’s breasts. 

and direct to PG

Naturally, you coward.....you're getting your *** kicked after hanging yourself out to dry.

Or you can make a point.

I have clinically dissected your stupid, quoting you VERBATIM at every turn.....I've anticipated the answers to the questions from which you would run, because they expose you as an impenetrably stupid human being.

That's "making a point without the need for questions".

StandLess Wonder.

Now everyone can see that you know neither the meaning of "stand" nor "case"....
 

 

It doesn't matter what he qualified.  He did not overturn the verdict which means what is on file in the court system is trump was liable for sexual assault and defamation.  

Not rape.  


I stopped when I got here.  The rest appeared you melting down and posting effluvium.

A judge has now clarified that this is basically a legal distinction without a real-world difference. He says that what the jury found Trump did was in fact rape, as commonly understood.