Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Kaplan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
Kaplan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
By *Huey
9 Aug 2025 8:44 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
10 Aug 2025 10:33 am
Why is the identity of the party asking for relief not relevant?*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.l
10 Aug 2025 10:46 am
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 10:33 am » wrote: ↑Why is the identity of the party asking for relief not relevant?*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.l
#real37x,
You are well over 20 questions on this thread. MOST of them are asking the same thing. Or, you can do one of two things, considering the OP has been resolved.
1. You can agree to answer questions on a one for one basis and stop editing quotes when you reply.
OR
2. Now, on this thread if you feel the answer to that question is somehow relevant you may go back to it, and without questions, take your stand, provide narrative and provide citations/attribjution as to why you think it is important to the subject. Make your own case, as most poster do on this forum.
Anything else will be moved to PG.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
10 Aug 2025 11:08 am
Tiny,*Huey » 23 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ #real37x,
You are well over 20 questions on this thread. MOST of them are asking the same thing. Or, you can do one of two things, considering the OP has been resolved.
1. You can agree to answer questions on a one for one basis and stop editing quotes when you reply.
OR
2. Now, on this thread if you feel the answer to that question is somehow relevant you may go back to it, and without questions, take your stand, provide narrative and provide citations/attribjution as to why you think it is important to the subject. Make your own case, as most poster do on this forum.
Anything else will be moved to PG.
This is about who appealed what, and why...
You can't answer any of those questions
10 Aug 2025 11:15 am
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
This is about who appealed what, and why...
You can't answer any of those questions
**** your questions. You don't answer any one else's questions, so Huey is under no obligation to answer yours.
Coward. Loser. Retard. Punk. ****-for-Brains. ****.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
10 Aug 2025 11:26 am
Vegas » 10 Aug 2025, 11:15 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 11:08 am » wrote: ↑ Tiny,
This is about who appealed what, and why...
You can't answer any of those questions
**** your questions. You don't answer any one else's questions, so Huey is under no obligation to answer yours.
Coward. Loser. Retard. Punk. ****-for-Brains. ****.
Now the #real37x is trying to tell me what the OP is about. What a fool. All he is doing is he is incapable, lacks the intelligence, to make a case.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
10 Aug 2025 11:29 am
The cowardice is nauseating.*Huey » 3 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Now the #real37x is trying to tell me what the OP is about. What a fool. All he is doing is he is incapable, lacks the intelligence, to make a case.
10 Aug 2025 11:34 am
Then you AGREE with the OP!!
Congratulations, you're making a tiny modicum of progress here!!
That was the SAME VERDICT that found that TRUMP did NOT commit RAPE!!
See, this is so easy once you get FACTS on your side!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
10 Aug 2025 11:34 am
If Kaplan didn't overturn the verdict awarding the Plaintiff $2 million, he did so because he rejected the Respondent's argument that the award is excessive "since it wasn't rape".*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
10 Aug 2025 11:35 am
Who appealed the verdict and why?*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Then you AGREE with the OP!!
Congratulations, you're making a tiny modicum of progress here!!
That was the SAME VERDICT that found that TRUMP did NOT commit RAPE!!
See, this is so easy once you get FACTS on your side!!
10 Aug 2025 11:37 am
The Defendant. Because it was EXCESSIVE compared to the JURY FINDINGS!!
See, this is easy!!
Are you mad bro??
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
10 Aug 2025 11:38 am
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ If Kaplan didn't overturn the verdict awarding the Plaintiff $2 million, he did so because he rejected the Respondent's argument that the award is excessive "since it wasn't rape".
So you are saying, Kaplan didn't overturn the FACT that the JURY found NO RAPE WAS PROVEN!!
See, so easy.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
10 Aug 2025 11:39 am
#real37x,Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑If Kaplan didn't overturn the verdict awarding the Plaintiff $2 million, he did so because he rejected the Respondent's argument that the award is excessive "since it wasn't rape".*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
That's nice and it is still irrelevant to the title and the OP. Keeping in mind the OP does give attribution to Google AI. Kinda like when your article has (CNN) before the first sentence and YOU provide no link. Additionally, as you were shown earlier, the OP does specify what verdict was being talked about.
You have proven you lie, you have proven you are incapable of making your own case, and you finally agreed that Kalpan did not overturn the case.
With that said Trump is not a rapist felon.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
10 Aug 2025 11:40 am
Because what WAS proven is broadly accepted as rape, the jury awarded 2 million.*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ So you are saying, Kaplan didn't overturn the FACT that the JURY found NO RAPE WAS PROVEN!!
See, so easy.
10 Aug 2025 11:41 am
*Huey » 10 Aug 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑ Now the #real37x is trying to tell me what the OP is about. What a fool. All he is doing is he is incapable, lacks the intelligence, to make a case.
I have always said, since 2017, he has no thoughts of his own. That's why he hides behind questions/demands, and copy/pasted material.
In fact, if he is reading this, he will copy/paste some of my comments over.
Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post:
[/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...
From which you are running...
10 Aug 2025 11:41 am
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ Because what WAS proven is broadly accepted as rape, the jury awarded 2 million.
But if that was the case, the JURY would have found RAPE occurred. They found exactly the opposite and that NO RAPE WAS PROVEN TO HAVE OCCURRED!!
See, so easy.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
10 Aug 2025 11:41 am
Not at all, you **** idiot.*Huey » 5 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ #real37x,
That's nice and it is still irrelevant to the title and the OP. Keeping in mind the OP does give attribution to Google AI. Kinda like when your article has (CNN) before the first sentence and YOU provide no link. Additionally, as you were shown earlier, the OP does specify what verdict was being talked about.
You have proven you lie, you have proven you are incapable of making your own case, and you finally agreed that Kalpan did not overturn the case.
With that said Trump is not a rapist felon.
That is why they provide you a link to AI's sources..
You're a coward, getting your dumb *** curbstomped..
10 Aug 2025 11:45 am
No....they DID find that rape occurred....that's why they awarded 2 million dollars..*Beekeeper » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ But if that was the case, the JURY would have found RAPE occurred. They found exactly the opposite and that NO RAPE WAS PROVEN TO HAVE OCCURRED!!
See, so easy.
What they didn't conclude was that Grifty had inserted his diseased micropenis.....
The judge SPECIFICALLY rejected the "not rape" argument.
10 Aug 2025 11:49 am
I think it worth noting that the OP has previously taken the position that this is merely a socialist judge offering unsolicited opinion.*Huey » Yesterday, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
But the OP is a Coward of Many Stands.
10 Aug 2025 11:54 am
Again, the verdict was she did not proof she was raped under the NY State definition of rape at the time. And that was instructed by Kaplan to use.Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑Because what WAS proven is broadly accepted as rape, the jury awarded 2 million.*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ So you are saying, Kaplan didn't overturn the FACT that the JURY found NO RAPE WAS PROVEN!!
See, so easy.
SO, regardless of how you spin it the jury verdict was sexual assault and defamation. Which Kaplan did not overturn.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
10 Aug 2025 11:57 am
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 11:40 am » wrote: ↑ Because what WAS proven is broadly accepted as rape, the jury awarded 2 million.
In order for Kaplan to say that he would have had to overturn the NO RAPE finding. And he didn't overturn the verdict to do that.
And in his OWN RULING on the appeal, he SAID, there was NO FINDING OF RAPE by the jury.
It must be difficult for you to comprehend that these are the facts. Ones you have NO STANDING to dispute.
Now, you are DISMISSED. TOTALLY!!
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
Who is online
In total there are 2289 users online :: 14 registered, 20 bots, and 2255 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, Blackvegetable, Buck Naked, ROG62, RebelGator, FJB, Beekeeper, LowIQTrash, PhiloBeddo, SouthernFried, nefarious101, sole, Huey
Bots: MSIECrawler, SiteLockSpider, Not, DuckDuckBot, Bolt, DuckDuckGo, LCC, CriteoBot, proximic, MaxPointCrawler, ADmantX, YandexBot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, okhttp, bingbot, Applebot, Mediapartners-Google, curl/7, Baiduspider