His toes are hanging over the edge, which means he only has 2" of footing on the ledge.
Anything would be better than the past 8 years...
Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2025, 6:41 am » wrote: ↑Anything would be better than the past 8 years...
So, did you actually count your tribute threads before lying about them?
*Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ You leave out the part where I admitted I was wrong. But hey, I don't expect better form you.
So, you still want to ban the 9 MIL handgun? Please oh please claim you never said that. PLEASE! LMAO!
show me.You leave out the part where I admitted I was wrong
post my words...you still want to ban the 9 MIL handgun?
Neither did the 2nd Circuit.*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
Here ya go:Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑*Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ You leave out the part where I admitted I was wrong. But hey, I don't expect better form you.
So, you still want to ban the 9 MIL handgun? Please oh please claim you never said that. PLEASE! LMAO!show me.You leave out the part where I admitted I was wrongpost my words...you still want to ban the 9 MIL handgun?
Let the lies begin.Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑That's NOT my logic..*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Which part is the lie? Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat. And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.
Just applying your logic.
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.
Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
Where is your admission?*Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ Here ya go:
Let the lies begin.
PS. This is how a man does it.
So you had to ban me from your "Sue AOC" thread?*Beekeeper » 12 Aug 2025, 7:04 am » wrote: ↑ It would be easier to list the ones who don't see you as a dickhead.
There are so few.
Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2025, 6:56 am » wrote: ↑Where is your admission?*Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ Here ya go:
Let the lies begin.
PS. This is how a man does it.
I don't see any reference to "9mm" in my post.
I think it is your reading issue....
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.
By being right, again?*Beekeeper » 12 Aug 2025, 7:35 am » wrote: ↑ It's because you brought your level of stupidity to the thread. Something I can PROVE you are- massively stupid. I can do it with ONE question too!!
Wanna play??
:die:Something I can PROVE you are- massively stupid. I can do it with ONE question too!!
Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2025, 7:37 am » wrote: ↑ By being right, again?
![]()
You should consider working blue...
I only have to be faster than you, Fondler...*Beekeeper » 12 Aug 2025, 7:39 am » wrote: ↑ How much you want to wager that I can prove you aren't smart??
Make it as easy or as hard on yourself as you want!!
It isn't going to be an IQ test...JohnnyYou » 12 Aug 2025, 7:42 am » wrote: ↑ I'll take Buzz Killer on in an IQ test any day of the week.
You ran.