No...that's putting words in my post..*Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ I comprehend well enough to know you said that the 9 mil was not appropriate for civilian use. LMAO!
Link?*Beekeeper » 13 Aug 2025, 6:29 am » wrote: ↑ The ONLY ONE that puts words into people's posts is YOU!! Because as the malignant narcissist you are, you MUST do that in order to "win"!!
Until you stop doing that, you lose.
You have acknowledged that I've told you.*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑ And yet you run from telling us what is LIKE the COLT AR A15 when you are replying to a comment about the 9 mil. Keep lying, Sir. You are just adding to your legacy.
Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑ You have acknowledged that I've told you.
You should stop lying about that now.
So, I told you.*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑ You lied And said your were talking about the ammo. Which was ****. You got caught and you ain’t man enough to admit it.
You were just caught lying.You lied
*Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 6:53 am » wrote: ↑Here ya go:Blackvegetable » 12 Aug 2025, 6:48 am » wrote: ↑*Huey » 12 Aug 2025, 6:45 am » wrote: ↑ You leave out the part where I admitted I was wrong. But hey, I don't expect better form you.
So, you still want to ban the 9 MIL handgun? Please oh please claim you never said that. PLEASE! LMAO!show me.You leave out the part where I admitted I was wrongpost my words...you still want to ban the 9 MIL handgun?
Let the lies begin.Blackvegetable » 28 Jun 2025, 1:36 pm » wrote: ↑That's NOT my logic..*Huey » 28 Jun 2025, 1:26 pm » wrote: ↑ Which part is the lie? Pistol rounds are less than intermediate and 9 mil was inspired for combat. And according to you anything designed for combat is a high powered fully charged cartridge.
Just applying your logic.
My logic is that, like the Colt AR-15, it was designed and optimized for combat.
Accordingly, they are inappropriate for civilian use.
PS. This is how a man does it.
you lie, and you can't read.*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ what is Like the COLT Ar 15? If you were talking bout the ammo you would have said 5.56. You didn’t. You lied anbout what you said.
Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 7:08 am » wrote: ↑ you lie, and you can't read.
Stop making that my problem.
Me - Evidence*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑ lmao!
You are a proven liar. You lies are more egregious when you are busted being wrong or “lying”.
*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ You have not provided any evidence.
What you did do was first run from any questions concerning your BS.
Eventually you came up with the cockamamy tale you were talking n about the ammo.
Thise actions are consistent with other mistakes or lies you have told. Run, and stall, until tyou come with some ****.
A few minutes ago, you confessed to lying.....about something to which you had already confessed you lied.You have not provided any evidence.
Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 7:18 am » wrote: ↑ A few minutes ago, you confessed to lying.....about something to which you had already confessed you lied.
Me - Evidence*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ Wow, your dishonesty grows daily.
just admit you **** up Sir. Act like a man.
Yes, lied. You weren’t talking about ammo. He Colt AR 15 is not ammo.
Narrative....in defense of a repeated lie.*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑ Yes, lied. You weren’t talking about ammo. He Colt AR 15 is not ammo.
Unfortunately your words tell a different story. If you meant ammo, you would have said LIKE 5.56. You didn’t.Blackvegetable » 13 Aug 2025, 7:47 am » wrote: ↑ Narrative....in defense of a repeated lie.
Every time.
Only in the retelling.*Huey » 13 Aug 2025, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑ Unfortunately your words tell a different story. If you meant ammo, you would have said LIKE 5.56. You didn’t.