The point, clearly, is that you have no idea what's in it.
Beekeeper » 24 Jun 2026, 5:14 am » wrote: ↑ IF you have some point to make about TRUMP'S APPEAL, post it!! OTHERWISE don't expect anyone here to do the work for you, PUMPKIN11
I posted ONE example already, but since you CAN'T SEEM TO READ and only want to post **** like this, **** OFF, CUPCAKE!!
I posted ONE example already,
Beekeeper » 23 Jun 2026, 8:56 pm » wrote: ↑ I won't lie about things like you do, CUPCAKE!!!
I know what was in the APPEAL and how Kaplan FULLY upheld the verdict IN THAT APPEAL!!
You have to be THE g'damndest POS that ever sucked air, PUMPKIN!!
Not to mention, it's been posted here so much that we can almost quote it VERBATIM!!
Oops!!
![]()
![]()
![]()
I know what was in the APPEAL and how Kaplan FULLY upheld the verdict IN THAT APPEAL!!
Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2026, 5:24 am » wrote: ↑ How do you know what's in a document you haven't read?
Blackvegetable » 24 Jun 2026, 5:16 am » wrote: ↑ The point, clearly, is that you have no idea what's in it.
Don't pretend to have read it, christian.
You haven't read it.Beekeeper » 24 Jun 2026, 5:28 am » wrote: ↑ DON'T pretend you know what I have and haven't read, COMMIE PIECE OF ****!!
You're an ignorant lying coward.....a christian.
Can you point to the one you are, runner?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom You're a world class idiot, JuCoROG62 » 24 Jun 2026, 5:54 am » wrote: ↑ Can you point to the one you are, runner?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EFdQsDgI0c0
I don't.Beekeeper » 24 Jun 2026, 6:04 am » wrote: ↑ Once AGAIN, you make ASSUMPTIONS without any foundation in FACT!!
Post an example.
sure, twit…suuuuure….
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom :die:Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 4:25 pm » wrote: ↑ A. The jury found that Carroll FAILED to prove a rape occurred. THAT fact is indisputable.
B. He can reject all he wants, that's why there are appeals courts. It's already there. BTW, the VERDICT wasn't appealed based on "amount awarded" but on ERRORS BY KAPLAN. That will ultimately win in the SCOTUS.
C. So?? It will ultimately end up in the SCOTUS and likely will have 100% of it tossed to the garbage heap. Seeing how MULTIPLE errors by Kaplan occurred. Those alone will be sufficient to overturn the case.
D. The Jury's verdict WAS upheld. In order for a "rape" to have been claimed, there is NO WAY you can circumvent the JURY unless you overturn the verdict. THAT verdict was simple- NO RAPE WAS PROVEN TO HAVE HAPPENED!! How hard is that for you to comprehend. Even Kaplan in the appeal decision even stated, that the JURY FOUND NO RAPE OCCURRED!!
Add insult to your injury, the COUNTERCLAIM BY TRUMP was what Kaplan "rejected" and wrote his BS opinion. It wasn't any APPEAL!! Which you have continued to claim it was. That too, is going to be appealed as well. This isn't going very well for you.
He’s the master clinger….4 yo level…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom