Liberal Forum

Huey » 29 Jun 2026, 12:44 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 12:44 pm

It his amusing watching you spin this.

*Roshambo » 29 Jun 2026, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 2:57 pm

Rape
Rape
Rape

Rape is a specific type of sexual assault usually involving sexual penetration without the victim's consent

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑

09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am

Google AI

Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
. 
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial. 
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare. 
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury. 

And that is all there is to say about that.

ROG62 » 30 Jun 2026, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 5:57 am

As “current” law states, yes…

not according to the law at time of alleged incident. “Innocent until proven guilty”, right? Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…

grab your limbs along with your feefees and go play in the street…

Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 6:06 am

The criminal code DOES NOT APPLY IN CIVIL CASES.

It met the burden of proof for a civil procedure - the preponderance of the evidence. 

He was deemed liable.

Your ignorance, though by no means a revelation, is nevertheless astonishing.

Blackvegetable » 29 Jun 2026, 1:18 pm » wrote: ↑

29 Jun 2026, 1:18 pm

Not nearly as much fun as watching you explain why it's "spin"

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 6:03 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 6:03 am

These are the stupidest human beings alive.

Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 7:56 am

Come on down, 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 7:56 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 7:56 am

Chase me!

Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 7:52 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 7:52 am

I have already explained and documented why it’s spin, loser.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 7:57 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 7:57 am

 

Link?

ROG62 » 30 Jun 2026, 5:57 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 5:57 am

As “current” law states, yes…

not according to the law at time of alleged incident. “Innocent until proven guilty”, right? Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…

grab your limbs along with your feefees and go play in the street…

yeah you --->Read me : ) Send me your address. You been dodging me boy.
Yer…. Entertaining and I make you . Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it. You are Persistent, do better. Remember that.
Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??

Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 7:59 am

Puss, any time I posted the jury verdict form.  I’ll add this to your list of lies, Puss.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 8:06 am

What was the verdict?

Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 8:08 am

I'm sorry, 

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 8:23 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 8:23 am

Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 8:08 am

I'm sorry, 

You're a lying coward.

 

Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 8:08 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 8:08 am

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 8:06 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 8:06 am

What was the verdict?

I'm sorry, you don't have question privileges.  Try again with a statement of fact.  Like what the jury verdict form said.  Particularly question number one.

 

Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 8:31 am

Try that again

If you ask again you will get the same answer.  Unless you act like a man, post my words in the format YOU DEMAND, and take a stand.  

But you are a coward like that.

Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 8:49 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 8:49 am

Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 8:31 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 8:31 am

Try that again

You're a lying coward..

If you ask again you will get the same answer.  Unless you act like a man, post my words in the format YOU DEMAND, and take a stand.  

But you are a coward like that.

 

 

Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑

30 Jun 2026, 9:05 am

I guess we are done here.  No Jury has found Trump liable for rape and the Supreme Court agrees.