Nice refutation…try again…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom What did the jury go by as a basis for the civil case?Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑ The criminal code DOES NOT APPLY IN CIVIL CASES.
It met the burden of proof for a civil procedure - the preponderance of the evidence.
He was deemed liable.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom The allegations and evidence.
Your turn..ROG62 » 30 Jun 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ Nice refutation…try again…
As “current” law states, yes…
not according to the law at time of alleged incident. “Innocent until proven guilty”, right? Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…
now, since you got nothin’…
grab your limbs along with your feefees and go play in the street…
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 6:06 am » wrote: ↑ The criminal code DOES NOT APPLY IN CIVIL CASES.
It met the burden of proof for a civil procedure - the preponderance of the evidence.
He was deemed liable.
Your ignorance, though by no means a revelation, is nevertheless astonishing.
That is false...Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ And as posted in the past the jury instructions were to go by the states legal definition or rape.
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑That is false...Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ And as posted in the past the jury instructions were to go by the states legal definition or rape.
There was no requirement that the jury consider the criminal code...it was a procedural matter agreed upon by both parties...
JuCoROG62 » 30 Jun 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑ Nice refutation…try again…
As “current” law states, yes…
not according to the law at time of alleged incident. “Innocent until proven guilty”, right? Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…
now, since you got nothin’…
grab your limbs along with your feefees and go play in the street…
Rape
Don't presume that, just because you refuse to accept it, it is "spin".
I stand by comments below, in full and in context, because they are based in fact. Until you show a Jury Verdict form that showed they agreed he RAPED Carroll all you are doing is spinning and refusing to accept established facts.Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑Don't presume that, just because you refuse to accept it, it is "spin".
Read Kaplan's response to Grifty's petition. Don't tell me how you feel about doing so.
It is irrelevant.
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑That is false...Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: ↑ And as posted in the past the jury instructions were to go by the states legal definition or rape.
There was no requirement that the jury consider the criminal code...it was a procedural matter agreed upon by both parties...
Keep spinning. NO JURY found trump liable for rape.
Your comments are entirely uninformed regarding the facts at issue.
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 1:45 pm » wrote: ↑I stand by comments below, in full and in context, because they are based in fact. Until you show a Jury Verdict form that showed they agreed he RAPED Carroll all you are doing is spinning and refusing to accept established facts.Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑Don't presume that, just because you refuse to accept it, it is "spin".
Read Kaplan's response to Grifty's petition. Don't tell me how you feel about doing so.
It is irrelevant.
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:32 am » wrote: ↑
That is false...
There was no requirement that the jury consider the criminal code...it was a procedural matter agreed upon by both parties...
Keep spinning. NO JURY found trump liable for rape.
Just show me that Jury Verdict. We are done here, Puss.Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 1:53 pm » wrote: ↑Your comments are entirely uninformed regarding the facts at issue.
Reality doesn't give a **** what you think about Kaplan's response to Team Grifty's petition.
Nice refutation…try again…
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom **** your question…I posted the facts while you post feefees…LBlackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ Your turn..
What reason did Team Grifty provide in petitioning for relief from the judgment?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom ^^^ deaf, dumb and blind…Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:27 am » wrote: ↑ The allegations and evidence.
The findings only purpose was to distinguish penile from digital insertion.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Read the opinion that was upheld...
No....you don't..ROG62 » 02 Jul 2026, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑ **** your question…I posted the facts while you post feefees…L
JuCoROG62 » 02 Jul 2026, 7:14 am » wrote: ↑ Nice refutation…try again…
As “current” law states, yes…
not according to the law at time of alleged incident. “Innocent until proven guilty”, right? Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…
now, since you got nothin’…
Are your missing limbs portrayed in the outline?