Kaplan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.

User avatar
By *Huey
9 Aug 2025 8:44 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
1 19 20 21 22 23
User avatar
ROG62
30 Jun 2026 10:18 am
User avatar
      
33,808 posts
*Roshambo » 30 Jun 2026, 8:01 am » wrote: JuCo
A toilet brush has your name on it.
Nice refutation…try again…

As “current” law states, yes…

not according to the law at time of alleged incident. “Innocent until proven guilty”, right? Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…

now, since you got nothin’…

grab your limbs along with your feefees and go play in the street…
 
Image JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom :rofl: If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
User avatar
ROG62
30 Jun 2026 10:22 am
User avatar
      
33,808 posts
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 6:06 am » wrote: The criminal code DOES NOT APPLY IN CIVIL CASES.

It met the burden of proof for a civil procedure - the preponderance of the evidence. 

He was deemed liable.

 
What did the jury go by as a basis for the civil case?

Your clinging ignorance, though by no means a revelation, is nevertheless astonishing.
 
Image JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom :rofl: If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
User avatar
Blackvegetable
30 Jun 2026 10:27 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,802 posts
ROG62 » 30 Jun 2026, 10:22 am » wrote: What did the jury go by as a basis for the civil case?


 
The allegations and evidence.

The findings only purpose was to distinguish penile from digital insertion.

 
User avatar
Blackvegetable
30 Jun 2026 10:28 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,802 posts
ROG62 » 30 Jun 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: Nice refutation…try again…

As “current” law states, yes…

not according to the law at time of alleged incident. “Innocent until proven guilty”, right? Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…

now, since you got nothin’…

grab your limbs along with your feefees and go play in the street…
Your turn..

What reason did Team Grifty provide in petitioning for relief from the judgment?
 
User avatar
Huey
30 Jun 2026 10:30 am
User avatar
      
35,512 posts
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 6:06 am » wrote: The criminal code DOES NOT APPLY IN CIVIL CASES.

It met the burden of proof for a civil procedure - the preponderance of the evidence. 

He was deemed liable.

Your ignorance, though by no means a revelation, is nevertheless astonishing.

And as posted in the past the jury instructions were to go by the states legal definition or rape.

stop talking about ignorance until you address your own.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Blackvegetable
30 Jun 2026 10:32 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,802 posts
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: And as posted in the past the jury instructions were to go by the states legal definition or rape.


 
That is false...


There was no requirement that the jury consider the criminal code...it was a procedural matter agreed upon by both parties...
User avatar
Huey
30 Jun 2026 10:52 am
User avatar
      
35,512 posts
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:32 am » wrote:
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: And as posted in the past the jury instructions were to go by the states legal definition or rape.



 
That is false...


There was no requirement that the jury consider the criminal code...it was a procedural matter agreed upon by both parties...

 

Keep spinning.  NO JURY found trump liable for rape.  
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
*Roshambo
30 Jun 2026 12:20 pm
User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
6,069 posts
ROG62 » 30 Jun 2026, 10:18 am » wrote: Nice refutation…try again…

As “current” law states, yes…

not according to the law at time of alleged incident. “Innocent until proven guilty”, right? Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…

now, since you got nothin’…

grab your limbs along with your feefees and go play in the street…
JuCo
chalk outline
 
yeah you :lol: --->Read me : ) Send me your address. You been dodging me boy.
Yer…. Entertaining and I make you :x . Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it. You are Persistent, do better. Remember that.
Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??
User avatar
*Roshambo
30 Jun 2026 12:21 pm
User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
6,069 posts
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: Keep spinning.  NO JURY found trump liable for rape.
Rape
 
yeah you :lol: --->Read me : ) Send me your address. You been dodging me boy.
Yer…. Entertaining and I make you :x . Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it. You are Persistent, do better. Remember that.
Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??
User avatar
Blackvegetable
30 Jun 2026 12:21 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,802 posts
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: Keep spinning.  
Don't presume that, just because you refuse to accept it, it is "spin".

Read Kaplan's response to Grifty's petition. Don't tell me how you feel about doing so.

It is irrelevant. 
User avatar
Huey
30 Jun 2026 1:45 pm
User avatar
      
35,512 posts
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 12:21 pm » wrote:
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: Keep spinning.  
Don't presume that, just because you refuse to accept it, it is "spin".

Read Kaplan's response to Grifty's petition. Don't tell me how you feel about doing so.

It is irrelevant. 

 
I stand by comments below, in full and in context, because they are based in fact.  Until you show a Jury Verdict form that showed they agreed he RAPED Carroll all you are doing is spinning and refusing to accept established facts.
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:52 am » wrote:
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:32 am » wrote:
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:30 am » wrote: And as posted in the past the jury instructions were to go by the states legal definition or rape.




 
That is false...


There was no requirement that the jury consider the criminal code...it was a procedural matter agreed upon by both parties...


 

Keep spinning.  NO JURY found trump liable for rape.  

 
 
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Blackvegetable
30 Jun 2026 1:53 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,802 posts
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 1:45 pm » wrote: I stand by comments below, 
Your comments are entirely uninformed regarding the facts at issue.


Reality doesn't give a **** what you think about Kaplan's response to Team Grifty's petition.

 
User avatar
Huey
30 Jun 2026 2:04 pm
User avatar
      
35,512 posts
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 1:45 pm » wrote:
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 12:21 pm » wrote:
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:52 am » wrote: Keep spinning.  
Don't presume that, just because you refuse to accept it, it is "spin".

Read Kaplan's response to Grifty's petition. Don't tell me how you feel about doing so.

It is irrelevant. 


 
I stand by comments below, in full and in context, because they are based in fact.  Until you show a Jury Verdict form that showed they agreed he RAPED Carroll all you are doing is spinning and refusing to accept established facts.
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 10:52 am » wrote:
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:32 am » wrote:

That is false...


There was no requirement that the jury consider the criminal code...it was a procedural matter agreed upon by both parties...



 

Keep spinning.  NO JURY found trump liable for rape.  


 
 

 
 
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 1:53 pm » wrote:
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 1:45 pm » wrote: I stand by comments below, 
Your comments are entirely uninformed regarding the facts at issue.


Reality doesn't give a **** what you think about Kaplan's response to Team Grifty's petition.

 

 
Just show me that Jury Verdict.  We are done here, Puss.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.

The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
User avatar
Blackvegetable
30 Jun 2026 2:07 pm
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,802 posts
Huey » 30 Jun 2026, 2:04 pm » wrote:
Just show me that Jury Verdict.  We are done here, Puss.

I've already told you what it is,,,,

2 million...in favor of Plaintiff

What do you see?
 
User avatar
ROG62
2 Jul 2026 7:14 am
User avatar
      
33,808 posts
Nice refutation…try again…

As “current” law states, yes…

not according to the law at time of alleged incident. “Innocent until proven guilty”, right? Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…

now, since you got nothin’…

Are your missing limbs portrayed in the outline?
 
Image JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom :rofl: If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
User avatar
ROG62
2 Jul 2026 7:19 am
User avatar
      
33,808 posts
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:28 am » wrote: Your turn..

What reason did Team Grifty provide in petitioning for relief from the judgment?
**** your question…I posted the facts while you post feefees…L
 
Image JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom :rofl: If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
User avatar
ROG62
2 Jul 2026 7:20 am
User avatar
      
33,808 posts
Blackvegetable » 30 Jun 2026, 10:27 am » wrote: The allegations and evidence.

The findings only purpose was to distinguish penile from digital insertion.
^^^ deaf, dumb and blind…

#trifecta

​​​​​​​
Image JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom :rofl: If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."
User avatar
Blackvegetable
2 Jul 2026 7:20 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,802 posts
ROG62 » 02 Jul 2026, 7:20 am » wrote: ^^^ deaf, dumb and blind…

#trifecta

 
Read the opinion that was upheld...
​​​​​​​
User avatar
Blackvegetable
2 Jul 2026 7:21 am
User avatar
Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
55,802 posts
ROG62 » 02 Jul 2026, 7:19 am » wrote: **** your question…I posted the facts while you post feefees…L
No....you don't..

Now post the fact requested...


 
User avatar
*Roshambo
2 Jul 2026 11:33 am
User avatar
Moderator
Moderator
6,069 posts
ROG62 » 02 Jul 2026, 7:14 am » wrote: Nice refutation…try again…

As “current” law states, yes…

not according to the law at time of alleged incident. “Innocent until proven guilty”, right? Remains innocent because it couldn’t be proven…

now, since you got nothin’…

Are your missing limbs portrayed in the outline?
JuCo
toilet brush…
 
@Blackvegetable  
yeah you :lol: --->Read me : ) Send me your address. You been dodging me boy.
Yer…. Entertaining and I make you :x . Look at you chasing me like a little puppy begging his master for attention. I should piss on the floor, rub your nose in it. You are Persistent, do better. Remember that.
Beekeeper » Who is Eugene Stoner??
1 19 20 21 22 23

Who is online

In total there are 5413 users online :: 5 registered, 16 bots, and 5392 guests
Bots: LCC, coccocbot, DuckDuckGo, ADmantX, okhttp, proximic, Mediapartners-Google, YandexBot, MicroMessenger, CriteoBot, Googlebot, facebookexternalhit, Baiduspider, Applebot, bingbot, curl/7
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search