Liberal Forum
Archive
‹
Political Chat Rooms
‹
No Holds Barred Political Forum
‹
Kaplan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
Kaplan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
By *Huey
9 Aug 2025 8:44 am in No Holds Barred Political Forum
9 Aug 2025 4:20 pm
*Beekeeper » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Oh he's capable. It's just that he doesn't like the RESULTS!!
A typical malignant narcissist behavior.
Tell me about Tyrantosaurus Wrecks. I heard he was the n thang too.
youtube /watch?v=zYKupOsaJmk
9 Aug 2025 4:22 pm
The result of my clinical dissection of the OP is that Tiny, by his own admission, is hiding behind PG....*Beekeeper » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Oh he's capable. It's just that he doesn't like the RESULTS!!
A typical malignant narcissist behavior.
but he has a reason why it is not cowardice.....
9 Aug 2025 5:41 pm
*Beekeeper » 09 Aug 2025, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh he's capable. It's just that he doesn't like the RESULTS!!
A typical malignant narcissist behavior.
I learned what narcissicism was when Trump came down the escalator.
Everybody has some in them. Trump just turns his up to 2028..
DUMP THE TRUMP SLUMP 2026!
Bump Caps Recommended..
Bump Caps Recommended..
9 Aug 2025 5:54 pm
The Verdict:*Huey » 09 Aug 2025, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
Note of what this makes absolutely no mention.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
And in this case the judge DIDN'T......frustrating the desires of the defense to have the specific conduct redefined.
9 Aug 2025 5:57 pm
**** idiot.....the coward hid this...*Beekeeper » 09 Aug 2025, 4:19 pm » wrote: ↑ Oh he's capable. It's just that he doesn't like the RESULTS!!
A typical malignant narcissist behavior.
Here's where AI and NoI, collide.
AI is entirely correct in saying Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict.
Because, in his filing which COP did not read, he declined TEAM GRIFTY'S petition to do so.
As OP has invited this *** kicking, I think it is time he told us why Team Grifty asked for relief.
9 Aug 2025 6:02 pm
Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ The Verdict:
a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
Note of what this makes absolutely no mention.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
And in this case the judge DIDN'T......frustrating the desires of the defense to have the specific conduct redefined.
no **** Sherlock. You are **** retarded. I already told you that Mr retard.
here is the thread title:
Re: Kaplan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
That is how a man does it. No ******* questions or demands.
Now tell me something about that I don’t already. You repeat your self, you try to divert, post what I already have or make demands off to PG.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
9 Aug 2025 6:04 pm
There is nothing to hide.Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑ **** idiot.....the coward hid this...
Here's where AI and NoI, collide.
AI is entirely correct in saying Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict.
Because, in his filing which COP did not read, he declined TEAM GRIFTY'S petition to do so.
As OP has invited this *** kicking, I think it is time he told us why Team Grifty asked for relief.
AI is entirely correct in saying Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict.
once again MR *******, you prove my point.
once again, short bus, the thread title:
Re: Kaplan DID NOT overturn the Jury Verdict.
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
9 Aug 2025 9:01 pm
Of course he did, he's a liberal democrat puke.Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 9:32 am » wrote: ↑ The Essence of NotReading...
In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial
9 Aug 2025 9:27 pm
and thanks to Mr BV the OP has been verified. Thanks, BV!
BV is in question time out indefinitely, until he takes the pledge to answer questions one for one.
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
The Pledge viewtopic.php?f=3&t=100927
Popular Vote Totals 2024 viewtopic.php?p=2685476#p2685476
BV's Sporter Losshttps: viewtopic.php?p=2610828#p2610828
BV 33 miles: viewtopic.php?p=2747521#p2747521
Sources viewtopic.php?p=2589152#p2589152
9 Aug 2025 10:35 pm
k
youtu.be/51270i8F3mU?si=qAROSmbxtf13Hklj
9 Aug 2025 10:37 pm
*Huey » Today, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
Kaplan came today
youtu.be/AQSjV4DZ-Gg?si=wFm5VQsohMxy3Tgf
9 Aug 2025 10:38 pm
9 Aug 2025 11:04 pm
Can you not read, you ignorant mother ****?Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 9:15 am » wrote: ↑ No one has ever claimed that Kaplan "overturned" the jury’s verdict....
This is why morons must NEVER play with AI...
Here's another reason.
The cretinous OP has not only been directed to the full text of Judge Kaplan's filing, but he has been repeatedly invited to confirm what obliged it. While refusing to do so on some principle unarticulated, said cretinous OP delegates the task of reading it to AI.
Had COP bothered to read it, he would be "educated" on the topic of the "special verdict" the idiot labors, but doesn't understand.
It is important to note that COP is only law, and reading, proximate.
When you complain, ur friends roll their eyes and ur enemies rejoice
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
"Because I SAY I am" is a todler's tantrum, not "science"
You cannot betray me - only yourself, to me.
Who cuts off your dick is not a friend
An opinion you won't defend is not your own
Humanity's Law of the Jungle: Survival NOT of the fittest, but of the tribe
When peeing in the pool, stand on the edge
If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?
9 Aug 2025 11:07 pm
hell yeah'
youtube /watch?v=qclirJr2yqw
9 Aug 2025 11:08 pm
youtube /watch?v=t7lPLwtIHMs
9 Aug 2025 11:09 pm
10 Aug 2025 5:59 am
He's been repeatedly upheld.
**** imbecile
10 Aug 2025 6:02 am
See, I told you that you wouldn't like the RESULT of the FACT that KAPLAN upheld the verdict in that there was no GUILTY VERDICT FOR RAPE!!Blackvegetable » 09 Aug 2025, 5:57 pm » wrote: ↑**** idiot.....the coward hid this...*Beekeeper » Sat Aug 09, 2025 5:19 pm » wrote: ↑
Sat Aug 09, 2025 5:19 pm
Oh he's capable. It's just that he doesn't like the RESULTS!!
A typical malignant narcissist behavior.
Here's where AI and NoI, collide.
AI is entirely correct in saying Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict.
Because, in his filing which COP did not read, he declined TEAM GRIFTY'S petition to do so.
As OP has invited this *** kicking, I think it is time he told us why Team Grifty asked for relief.
And the appeal was filed DUE TO AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT AWARDED, nothing more, nothing less. Accept that one simple fact and then you can stop with trying to find something that wasn't there.
Liberals are spoiled children, miserable, unsatisfied, demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic & useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats ~O'Rourke
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
The Democratic Party seems intransigent on their position of keeping the party ‘woke,’ detached, exclusionary, and totally insane.
10 Aug 2025 6:09 am
Post the verdict to which you refer.*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ See, I told you that you wouldn't like the RESULT of the FACT that KAPLAN upheld the verdict in that there was no GUILTY VERDICT FOR RAPE!!
And the appeal was filed DUE TO AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT AWARDED, nothing more, nothing less. Accept that one simple fact and then you can stop with trying to find something that wasn't there.
You people are such **** morons.
10 Aug 2025 6:10 am
You're so **** g'ddammned stupid, Fondler.*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ See, I told you that you wouldn't like the RESULT of the FACT that KAPLAN upheld the verdict in that there was no GUILTY VERDICT FOR RAPE!!
And the appeal was filed DUE TO AN EXCESSIVE AMOUNT AWARDED, nothing more, nothing less. Accept that one simple fact and then you can stop with trying to find something that wasn't there.
Who petitioned for relief?
Who is online
In total there are 5191 users online :: 12 registered, 15 bots, and 5164 guests
Registered users: Vegas, Johnny You, *Roshambo, Blackvegetable, Squatchman, ROG62, RebelGator, Beekeeper, nefarious101, sole, Fuelman, PoliticalPopUp
Bots: newspaper, Bolt, okhttp, ADmantX, MicroMessenger, proximic, facebookexternalhit, Applebot, YandexBot, Googlebot, curl/7, CriteoBot, Mediapartners-Google, Baiduspider, bingbot