https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.pngBlackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 6:09 am » wrote: ↑ Post the verdict to which you refer.
You people are such **** morons.
Why does this thread need PG?*Huey » Yesterday, 8:44 am » wrote: ↑ Google AI
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan presided over the E. Jean Carroll defamation trial against Donald Trump where a jury found Trump liable for sexual abuse and defamation, awarding Carroll $5 million in damages
.
Judge Kaplan did not overturn the jury's verdict in that case. In fact, he later upheld the verdict and denied Trump's motion for a new trial.
It's important to note that a judge can overturn a jury's verdict in certain specific circumstances, such as if there wasn't enough evidence to support the verdict or if there were errors during the trial that prejudiced the outcome. However, this is relatively rare.
In this particular case, Judge Kaplan not only upheld the jury's verdict but also, in a later, separate trial determining damages for a different defamatory statement, ruled that Trump was precluded from arguing that he did not sexually assault Ms. Carroll, leaving only the issue of damages to be decided by the jury.
And that is all there is to say about that.
That's not the verdict.
As much as the **** coward refuses to acknowledge it, that IS NOT the verdict.
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ You're so **** g'ddammned stupid, Fondler.
Who petitioned for relief?
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 6:25 am » wrote: ↑ As much as the **** coward refuses to acknowledge it, that IS NOT the verdict.
The ****** may run, but he cannot hide.
Fondler,*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 6:26 am » wrote: ↑ You're running in big circles now. Try to realize that you have nothing more you can say to repair this mess you created.
Kaplan UPHELD THE VERDICT. I posted that. You don't like it doesn't change the FACT that Trump was found NOT GUILTY OF RAPE!!
Unless you have something more, you are DISMISSED.
In favor of Plaintiff, in the amount of 2 million dollars.
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑ In favor of Plaintiff, in the amount of 2 million dollars.
Is that the VERDICT?? What YOU offered was the AWARD, not any VERDICT!!Beekeeper=13px » Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:27 am=13px » wrote: ↑
Sun Aug 10, 2025 7:27 am
It it's not the verdict, then what is it??
Of course it is, ****.*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 7:02 am » wrote: ↑ That's NOT the question at hand here. STOP trying to circular reason you way out of this FAILURE OF YOURS!!
This is pointless..*Beekeeper » 10 Aug 2025, 7:01 am » wrote: ↑ You didn't answer the question. Try again or this ends NOW!!
Is that the VERDICT?? What YOU offered was the AWARD, not any VERDICT!!
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ This is pointless..
You're a **** idiot.
The verdict upheld was that in favor of the plaintiff, for $2million.
It was the award that Team Grifty appealed.
You people are so **** g'ddammned stupid
Who petitioned to have what reduced?*Huey » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑ Thanks again. Kaplan did not overturn the jury verdict. Don’t give a **** why, 37x, he just did meaning Trump was not found liable for rape.
You seem very upset here.Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 7:13 am » wrote: ↑ This is pointless..
You're a **** idiot.
The verdict upheld was that in favor of the plaintiff, for $2million.
It was the award that Team Grifty appealed.
You people are so **** g'ddammned stupid
Blackvegetable » 10 Aug 2025, 6:51 am » wrote: ↑ In favor of Plaintiff, in the amount of 2 million dollars.
Yes.
Who sought relief, Fondler?*Beekeeper » Today, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑ You seem very upset here.
THIS is a verdict form for a VERDICT...
https://www.politico.com/dims4/default/ ... 180432.png
And this is the one KAPLAN UPHELD!!
How hard is that one for you to understand?? And that INCLUDED the finding that NO RAPE WAS PROVEN!!
See, this is easy once you stop the "circular firing squad" you are trying to get in the middle of. You are ONLY shooting yourself in this.