Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm

Your idiotic comment I destroyed.  

Now check this out.  This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:

Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/

Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.

 

You will have to specify what assallt weapon(s) you are discussing.  Be specific.  

Post the reason you support not allowing citizens defend themselves with firearms.

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:52 pm

You will have to specify what assallt weapon(s) you are discussing.  Be specific.  

Post the reason you support not allowing citizens defend themselves with firearms.

No, I don't  have to do anything. 

Just watch you run from another yap outburst.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:54 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:52 pm

You will have to specify what assallt weapon(s) you are discussing.  Be specific.  

Post the reason you support not allowing citizens defend themselves with firearms.

No, I don't  have to do anything. 

Just watch you run from another yap outburst.
 

 

Just as a reminder this thread is about a store owner who defended himself, his employees and his property with a PISTO, Reframey.

I have no clue what assault weapons you are talking about.  Run lil man, Run.  That is what you so when you are asked to specify.

Continue with your lies.  This is fun.  Must suck living with all of those law abiding citizens carry firearms in your state. Maybe we should tell the YOU want to take that right away.

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:57 pm

Just as a reminder this thread is about a store owner who defended himself, his employees and his property with a PISTO, Reframey.

I have no clue what assault weapons you are talking about.  Run lil man, Run.  That is what you so when you are asked to specify.

Continue with your lies.  This is fun.  Must suck living with all of those law abiding citizens carry firearms in your state. Maybe we should tell the YOU want to take that right away.

Run.

Don't keep yapping.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:59 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:59 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:57 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 1:57 pm

Just as a reminder this thread is about a store owner who defended himself, his employees and his property with a PISTO, Reframey.

I have no clue what assault weapons you are talking about.  Run lil man, Run.  That is what you so when you are asked to specify.

Continue with your lies.  This is fun.  Must suck living with all of those law abiding citizens carry firearms in your state. Maybe we should tell the YOU want to take that right away.

Run.

Don't keep yapping.
 

 

Even though you are reframng as soon as you tell me what "assault weapons" you are speaking about I will discuss.

 

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:01 pm

Even though you are reframng as soon as you tell me what "assault weapons" you are speaking about I will discuss.

No, Controlly.

You're owed nothing.


 

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:03 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:01 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:01 pm

Even though you are reframng as soon as you tell me what "assault weapons" you are speaking about I will discuss.

No, Controlly.

You're owed nothing.


 

 

I can't answer your question.  We are left with the fact you would rather see innocents killed rather than have an armed person shoot the aggressor(s).  Survivors hurt your agenda.

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:04 pm

I can't answer your question.  We are left with the fact you would rather see innocents killed rather than have an armed person shoot the aggressor(s).  Survivors hurt your agenda.

It is remarkable how I always find questions you always find reason not to answer.

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:18 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:18 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:04 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:04 pm

I can't answer your question.  We are left with the fact you would rather see innocents killed rather than have an armed person shoot the aggressor(s).  Survivors hurt your agenda.

It is remarkable how I always find questions you always find reason not to answer.

 

It is amazing how you not only reframe a thread you simply refuse to specify what you are talking about.  The problem is the definition of an assault weapon changes from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.  There is no standard definition.

SO for you to argue this intelligently you must specify what weapon you are talking about.
 

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:22 pm

It is amazing how you not only reframe a thread you simply refuse to specify what you are talking about.  The problem is the definition of an assault weapon changes from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.  There is no standard definition.

SO for you to argue this intelligently you must specify what weapon you are talking about.

No retellings, please.

You'll only run....again.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:25 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:25 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:22 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:22 pm

It is amazing how you not only reframe a thread you simply refuse to specify what you are talking about.  The problem is the definition of an assault weapon changes from jurisdiction to jurisdiction.  There is no standard definition.

SO for you to argue this intelligently you must specify what weapon you are talking about.

No retellings, please.

You'll only run....again.
 

 

Why are you so afraid to tell me EXACLTY what type of weapon you are talking about?  And this is why most here think you are a ******.

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:27 pm

Why are you so afraid to tell me EXACLTY what type of weapon you are talking about?  And this is why most here think you are a ******.

You running from a question does not become my obligation.


 

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:38 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:38 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:27 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:27 pm

Why are you so afraid to tell me EXACLTY what type of weapon you are talking about?  And this is why most here think you are a ******.

You running from a question does not become my obligation.


 

 

Once you specify what your definition of an assault is and which specific weapons you are discussing I will be more than happy to give you a ONE post answer.

I am not OBLIGATED to answer an ambiguous question that even you can't define.   

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 10:26 am » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 10:26 am

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 9:50 am

     

Don't be such a ****, Ammosexual.

This is about obliging acceptance of your perversions.

BV hates this:

https://youtu.be/BDzaXkhxtBE?si=-uBaBTol5CjAIGmO

 

@Blackvegetable  

Are these guys carrying assault weapons?  

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:40 pm

Once you specify what your definition of an assault is and which specific weapons you are discussing I will be more than happy to give you a ONE post answer.

I am not OBLIGATED to answer an ambiguous question that even you can't define.

Welshy,

No....you know why.

 

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:42 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:42 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:40 pm

Once you specify what your definition of an assault is and which specific weapons you are discussing I will be more than happy to give you a ONE post answer.

I am not OBLIGATED to answer an ambiguous question that even you can't define.

Welshy,

No....you know why.

 

 

I can't answer if you can't define what you are asking about.  Run, ******, Run.

I win.

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:43 pm

I can't answer if you can't define what you are asking about.  Run, ******, Run.

I win.

just the half you understand will do..

As a sign of your good faith.

So people don't think you're a ******.

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:45 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:45 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:43 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:43 pm

I can't answer if you can't define what you are asking about.  Run, ******, Run.

I win.

just the half you understand will do..

As a sign of your good faith.

So people don't think you're a ******.

Not many here think I am a ******.

From google AI:

The prompt was what is an assault rifle.

Key points about the term "assault weapon":

• Semi-automatic vs. automatic:
  "Assault weapons" are typically semi-automatic, meaning they fire one bullet per trigger pull, unlike fully automatic weapons that continue firing as long as the trigger is held. 

• Military-style features:
  Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines. 

• Not a technical term:
  "Assault weapon" is not a universally recognized technical or legal term. 
• Varied definitions:
  Different states and jurisdictions define "assault weapon" differently, leading to inconsistencies in regulations. 

Once you specify what actual weapon you are speaking of your question will be answered and both lies will be addressed.
 
 

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:47 pm

Not many here think I am a ******.

From google AI:

The prompt was what is an assault rifle.

Key points about the term "assault weapon":

• Semi-automatic vs. automatic:
  "Assault weapons" are typically semi-automatic, meaning they fire one bullet per trigger pull, unlike fully automatic weapons that continue firing as long as the trigger is held. 

• Military-style features:
  Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines. 

• Not a technical term:
  "Assault weapon" is not a universally recognized technical or legal term. 
• Varied definitions:
  Different states and jurisdictions define "assault weapon" differently, leading to inconsistencies in regulations. 

Once you specify what actual weapon you are speaking of your question will be answered and both lies will be addressed.

Tiny,

They run as scairt as you do.
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:49 pm

*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:47 pm » wrote: ↑

16 Aug 2025, 2:47 pm

Not many here think I am a ******.

From google AI:

The prompt was what is an assault rifle.

Key points about the term "assault weapon":

• Semi-automatic vs. automatic:
  "Assault weapons" are typically semi-automatic, meaning they fire one bullet per trigger pull, unlike fully automatic weapons that continue firing as long as the trigger is held. 

• Military-style features:
  Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines. 

• Not a technical term:
  "Assault weapon" is not a universally recognized technical or legal term. 
• Varied definitions:
  Different states and jurisdictions define "assault weapon" differently, leading to inconsistencies in regulations. 

Once you specify what actual weapon you are speaking of your question will be answered and both lies will be addressed.

Tiny,

They run as scairt as you do.
 

 

Still waiting on your definition and what specific assault weapons you are asking about.