Answer is below. This is day 3 of your running. You can't hide behind PG here, Runny. I'm out. I'll check tomorrow to see if your manned up. I doubt it. That has been your issue since you exercised your options.Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑No, you're not.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Still waiting on your definition and what specific assault weapons you are asking about.
You're running scairt...
*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑Since you refuse to specify what assault weapons you are discussing OR define what an assault weapon is I will go with this:Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/1. I have never said I was in FAVOR of machine gun regelations as they stand since 1986
- Military-style features:
Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines.
2. What you call an assault weapon, and all bans of such, are not based on function but on cosmetic features. Removal of some of those features in some juridictions make them legal BUT they still have the same operation. THey are still nothing more than a semi auto.Acknowledge you were answered.
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:54 pm » wrote: ↑No, I don't have to do anything.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ You will have to specify what assallt weapon(s) you are discussing. Be specific.
Post the reason you support not allowing citizens defend themselves with firearms.
Just watch you run from another yap outburst.
Good Morning Mr.Vegetable, just to remind you of what your are running from.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑Since you refuse to specify what assault weapons you are discussing OR define what an assault weapon is I will go with this:Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/1. I have never said I was in FAVOR of machine gun regelations as they stand since 1986
- Military-style features:
Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines.
2. What you call an assault weapon, and all bans of such, are not based on function but on cosmetic features. Removal of some of those features in some juridictions make them legal BUT they still have the same operation. THey are still nothing more than a semi auto.Acknowledge you were answered.
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑No, you're not.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Still waiting on your definition and what specific assault weapons you are asking about.
You're running scairt...
Tomorrow will be day 4.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑Since you refuse to specify what assault weapons you are discussing OR define what an assault weapon is I will go with this:Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/1. I have never said I was in FAVOR of machine gun regelations as they stand since 1986
- Military-style features:
Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines.
2. What you call an assault weapon, and all bans of such, are not based on function but on cosmetic features. Removal of some of those features in some juridictions make them legal BUT they still have the same operation. THey are still nothing more than a semi auto.Acknowledge you were answered.
Day 7 of your run.*Huey » 19 Aug 2025, 3:32 pm » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑No, you're not.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Still waiting on your definition and what specific assault weapons you are asking about.
You're running scairt...
*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑Since you refuse to specify what assault weapons you are discussing OR define what an assault weapon is I will go with this:Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑
Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.1. I have never said I was in FAVOR of machine gun regelations as they stand since 1986
- Military-style features:
Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines.
2. What you call an assault weapon, and all bans of such, are not based on function but on cosmetic features. Removal of some of those features in some juridictions make them legal BUT they still have the same operation. THey are still nothing more than a semi auto.Acknowledge you were answered.
Come take mine ***.Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ An abusive partner’s access to a firearm is a serious threat to victims of domestic violence, making it five times more likely that a woman will be killed. Domestic violence assaults involving a gun are 12 times more likely to result in death than those involving other weapons or bodily force.
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑No, you're not.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Still waiting on your definition and what specific assault weapons you are asking about.
You're running scairt...
This is day 8.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑Since you refuse to specify what assault weapons you are discussing OR define what an assault weapon is I will go with this:Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/1. I have never said I was in FAVOR of machine gun regelations as they stand since 1986
- Military-style features:
Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines.
2. What you call an assault weapon, and all bans of such, are not based on function but on cosmetic features. Removal of some of those features in some juridictions make them legal BUT they still have the same operation. THey are still nothing more than a semi auto.Acknowledge you were answered.
Even though I answered you still have not posted what definition of "Assault Weapon" you are using. Last week I gave you some to choose from.Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/

Come get mine ***. When you get done cock pulling...Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ An abusive partner’s access to a firearm is a serious threat to victims of domestic violence, making it five times more likely that a woman will be killed. Domestic violence assaults involving a gun are 12 times more likely to result in death than those involving other weapons or bodily force.
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.
I had a mini 14 and an SKS that accepted 30 round mags. Sold them at a profit.*Huey » 24 Aug 2025, 1:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Even though I answered you still have not posted what definition of "Assault Weapon" you are using. Last week I gave you some to choose from.
murdock » 24 Aug 2025, 3:21 pm » wrote: ↑ I had a mini 14 and an SKS that accepted 30 round mags. Sold them at a profit.
Bwahahaha!!!
One way police recommend to lower those risks is to shut the **** up and stop all that nagging.Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ An abusive partner’s access to a firearm is a serious threat to victims of domestic violence, making it five times more likely that a woman will be killed.
Are you suggesting that guns are more dangerous than a shove, or a thrown remote control?Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑ Domestic violence assaults involving a gun are 12 times more likely to result in death than those involving other weapons or bodily force.
The Constitution does the obliging, fruity.Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 9:50 am » wrote: ↑![]()
![]()
![]()
Don't be such a ****, Ammosexual.
This is about obliging acceptance of your perversions.
Nah, I don't care enough. Thanks, though.Cannonpointer » 24 Aug 2025, 5:37 pm » wrote: ↑ One way police recommend to lower those risks is to shut the **** up and stop all that nagging.
Are you suggesting that guns are more dangerous than a shove, or a thrown remote control?
Man, we can't slip NOTHIN past ya! Like a **** steel trap, you are.
Ya SEEM to, though.
My ***….you got thousands of BS posts on the subject. Run, it is day 9.
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑No, you're not.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Still waiting on your definition and what specific assault weapons you are asking about.
You're running scairt...
Day 11*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑Since you refuse to specify what assault weapons you are discussing OR define what an assault weapon is I will go with this:Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/1. I have never said I was in FAVOR of machine gun regelations as they stand since 1986
- Military-style features:
Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines.
2. What you call an assault weapon, and all bans of such, are not based on function but on cosmetic features. Removal of some of those features in some juridictions make them legal BUT they still have the same operation. THey are still nothing more than a semi auto.Acknowledge you were answered.