Liberal Forum

MR-7 » 24 Aug 2025, 10:48 am » wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2025, 10:48 am

Maybe this can help you understand.   

https://youtu.be/ODxbltNbwtk

I'm sorry, sir, but I do not comport with *** - not even their pups. 

The closest I ever come to *** is a giant jar with a pickled foot in it, which sits on my mantel.

My great grea great grand daddy cut it off of Kunta Kinte - for his own good, to get his mind right. 

It's an heirloom from better days. 

Zeets2 » 24 Aug 2025, 10:53 am » wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2025, 10:53 am

Of course I've provided a simplistic example!  That's how the process is most easily understood when you're explaining a basic principle to someone who is entirely clueless about the subject.  And YES, OF COURSE it assumes that the entire amount of the devaluation is passed on, but that doesn't change the fact!  We're NOT talking about ANY other outside factors that can ALWAYS affect the amount the importer charges his customer.  There is NEVER any such obligation intended in Trump's policy to add the tariff, WAS THERE?  An importer can raise prices for a multitude of reasons that have nothing to do with the tariff OR with the devaluation!  It's also quite possible that the currency devaluation could be reduced even more than the amount of the tariff increase, and that would make the price even lower than before the tariff was added.

Care to deny that?
 

ha ha ha ha ha ha. Rational simplicity won't discuss simple compounding chromosomes honestly of ever changing population living in a series parallel situation equally alive as sole results of genetic details never duplicated twice per total sum hearts beating forward one at a time now each heart has a personal brain navigating space cradle to grave as genetics eternally separates active cycles living now.

Cannonpointer » 24 Aug 2025, 3:50 pm » wrote: ↑

24 Aug 2025, 3:50 pm

The Prius runs on gas, idiot. It has an internal combustion engine.

Just rest, you **** fruit.

Hard to believe that someone could be dumb enough to spend tens of thousands of dollars to buy a new car and yet be unaware that what he bought is an ELECTRIC VEHICLE hybrid with BOTH an electric motor AND a gas-powered engine.

And just when we think you couldn't possibly get any dumber, you volunteer something as asinine as that!:

Is the Toyota Prius an Electric Car? ExplainedCar Bibles By Jennifer Haroon June 23, 2025

The Toyota Prius, specifically, is classified as a **parallel hybrid**. This means that the gasoline engine and electric motor can work independently or together to power the wheels. The Prius’s hybrid system consists of several key components:

1. Gasoline Engine
The Prius is equipped with a 1.8-liter four-cylinder gasoline engine that generates a modest amount of power. This engine primarily functions at higher speeds and during acceleration, providing the necessary thrust for the vehicle.

2. Electric Motor
The electric motor in the Prius plays a crucial role in both starting the vehicle and assisting the gasoline engine during acceleration. It can also power the wheels independently at low speeds, allowing for short periods of electric-only driving.

Guess it's fortunate for you that you only exposed your ignorance in the peanut gallery instead of the main forum.
So breathe a sigh of relief for that at least!

Not having a very good week, are you, asshole?
 

Zeets2 » 25 Aug 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

25 Aug 2025, 9:29 am

Hard to believe that someone could be dumb enough to spend tens of thousands of dollars to buy a new car and yet be unaware that what he bought is an ELECTRIC VEHICLE hybrid with BOTH an electric motor AND a gas-powered engine.

And just when we think you couldn't possibly get any dumber, you volunteer something as asinine as that!:

Guess it's fortunate for you that you only exposed your ignorance in the peanut gallery instead of the main forum.
So breathe a sigh of relief for that at least!

Not having a very good week, are you, asshole?

Aren't you cute - you went googling, and are rapidly changing your story.

Too bad your sleaze is consigned to the peanut gallery, fool. 

You thought I plugged it in tocharge it. You said so. You were wrong. And you';ve shown your truth.You're a cheap punk who cannot even own his mistake.
 

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 8:30 am

*Beekeeper » 22 Aug 2025, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2025, 8:21 pm

He totally earned it on Nov. 5th, 2024.

Overwhelmingly. Lest you try to forget, we'll keep reminding you that all swing states AND the popular vote went Trump. THAT's all the "earning" he needs.

Post the popular vote margin.

Not that it matters but they were posted to you numerous times.  In my sig is a link to the last time I posted them to you.  So, if you need them, you know where to find them.

*Beekeeper » 31 Aug 2025, 11:32 am » wrote: ↑

31 Aug 2025, 11:32 am

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 8:30 am

Post the popular vote margin.

No.

It's not anything that has meaning since we don't elect a President based on popular vote.

Unless you have some point to make, you can forget me doing any of the work for you. If you want post "vote margin" feel free. But again, it's a pointless metric.

 
 

*Huey » 31 Aug 2025, 11:58 am » wrote: ↑

31 Aug 2025, 11:58 am

Not that it matters but they were posted to you numerous times.  In my sig is a link to the last time I posted them to you.  So, if you need them, you know where to find them.

He loves employing  that tactic. Broken record is a classic and textbook response for narcissists. That is why I respond with this video instead of reposting what he demands. 

https://youtu.be/PHhyPttsGsk?feature=shared

Blackvegetable » 23 Aug 2025, 8:30 am » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 8:30 am

*Beekeeper » 22 Aug 2025, 8:21 pm » wrote: ↑

22 Aug 2025, 8:21 pm

He totally earned it on Nov. 5th, 2024.

Overwhelmingly. Lest you try to forget, we'll keep reminding you that all swing states AND the popular vote went Trump. THAT's all the "earning" he needs.

Post the popular vote margin.

 

Yo have been given them before.  Although they are not important (you never make an argument) the link is in my sig box.  

Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Aug 2025, 1:15 pm

Every time you dodge you make my point.

There is no point to make with the popular vote "margin", totals, or anything else relating to the popular vote. 

NO PRESIDENT has ever been elected based on that.

So what IS your point?? Other than you lost both popular, Electoral college, and ALL 7 swing states.

What do you have beside nothing??

Blackvegetable » 31 Aug 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑

31 Aug 2025, 1:15 pm

Every time you dodge you make my point.

THIS point??

https://preview.redd.it/a-mostly-comple ... 95486f6225
 

Blackvegetable » 01 Sep 2025, 2:03 pm » wrote: ↑

01 Sep 2025, 2:03 pm

So we STILL have no MAGAt ready to explain why Americans must pay more because Grifty's buddy, Jair Bolsonaro, got his *** in a sling?


**** sheep.

 

Still hiding behind PG have you got what definition of "assault weapon" you were using?

Blackvegetable » 02 Sep 2025, 12:55 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 12:55 pm

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... democracy/

Speaking to a U.S.-Saudi investment conference in Riyadh on May 13, President Donald Trump enunciated what might be called the Trump doctrine of noninterference in other nations’ internal affairs. He denounced “Western interventionalists” who give foreign leaders “lectures on how to live and how to govern your own affairs.” By contrast, he said, “I believe it is God’s job to sit in judgment; my job, to defend America.”...

One can also detect the policy in the State Department’s recently released human rights reports on Trump’s authoritarian allies. Incredibly enough, the report on El Salvador claims “there were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses” in 2024. That’s quite a contrast to the findings of independent monitors such as Human Rights Watch, which reports that the regime of Nayib Bukele has engaged in “arbitrary arrests, enforced disappearances, and torture and other ill-treatment of detainees.”....

But the State Department’s “see no evil” approach shifts dramatically when it is describing democratic countries whose leaders are at odds with Trump. The report on Brazil — which is putting on trial a Trump ally, former president Jair Bolsonaro, on charges of trying to overturn an election — criticizes that country for “significant human rights issues,” such as “broad and disproportionate action to undermine freedom of speech.” Thus, in Trump’s Orwellian logic, Brazil’s attempts to defend democracy become an attack on democracy. Trump has backed up his disapprobation of Brazil’s legal system by imposing 50 percent tariffs on the country.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors   

Blackvegetable » 03 Sep 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 10:31 am

What makes it "spam"?

Hiding again. This mother **** can't stop hiding. You don't answer my questions, so I won't answer yours.

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 9:21 am » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 9:21 am

Voluminous evidence uncovered by the Federal Police indicated that Bolsonaro and some of his military allies conspired to overturn the election and block Lula’s inauguration. The conspiracy appears to have included plans to assassinate Lula, Vice President-elect Geraldo Alckmin and Justice Moraes. Fortunately, the army command, under pressure from the Biden administration, refused to go along with the coup attempt.

ibid.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 10:31 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 10:31 am

That's one of two tells to indicate that you're addressing someone who doesn't know **** about Econ.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 10:36 am

I don't address questions about Survivorship bias from people who understand nothing about Survivorship bias.

I forgot about adding "copout" and "projection" to the prediction list. I'll do that now.
 

Blackvegetable » 21 Oct 2025, 10:39 am » wrote: ↑

21 Oct 2025, 10:39 am

Don't. 

Address your arrears of nearly 3 years ago, or live by your own conditions.

And there is the prediction again. The same **** one. Pathetic. puke. 

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Blackvegetable » 22 Oct 2025, 7:27 am » wrote: ↑

22 Oct 2025, 7:27 am

You're right..

It's very easy.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal:

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

  
 
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 8:59 am

That's a lie, Duck.

I prove it and you change your handle to "VirginMary"...

Deal?

you can't and wont prove it... sorry *******

FJB » 29 Oct 2025, 9:07 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:07 am

you can't and wont prove it... sorry *******

I can, and will.

Run.
 

Johnny You » 27 Nov 2025, 5:23 am » wrote: ↑

27 Nov 2025, 5:23 am

Well, thanks for the reply.  I do care about kids futures and I abhore and detest any abuse.
I do not think it is fair  to label every liberal a child groomer. And I think if you study the demographics of the offenders you know who they are. I will continue to respectfully ask you change my label on this site.  Maybe someday I will have full restoration of digital rights if you guys ever feel a sense a guilt. You guys get high on the power.

We were discussing here at home the subject of drag queens in elementary school. I tend to agree that parents have a right to provide consent for the content of the education their children are exposed to.  I am recalling how the PE teacher taught us in sex ed what a dick is in 3rd grade and that it is ok and normal to do the whackadoodle. I din't think it was until the 5th grade they taught us what a vagina was and how the opertion works. Mrs was not on board with any helicopter educational surveillance.

Evidently, a troublesome male teacher told a kid (5th grade) in our circle (who is a little bold) to "Suck My Apples" in class.  The Mom is going to make a complaint, and evidently she is not the first about the dude.
 
 

There is no such thing as fair trade in social realities sustained by the tyranny of intellectual manifested fate within one's ancestral lineage of this species socially trying to prove genetics cannot be the single source of eternal separation daily between generation gaps of current life in this atmosphere.

Ancestries that understand natural limitations of time alive navigate living by hearts beating and personal brain navigating their own relative time alive living one at a time exactly where they are every rotation lived since conceived into personal location adapting their body as never same total sum achieved twice equally living here now.

Chromosomes in DNA are used against each ancestor in a court of criminal law, same as their social behavior relative to social identity performed in civil court judging how each ancestor every generation gap here stay in character contextually nurtured historically now, cradle to grave.

Historical patterns of behavior following established laws governing who's who every second of rotation 365.2422 days a year regardless the year has 365 or 366 rotations labeled 7 figurative days a week 52 weeks annually as 8 seasonal shifts work between 2 solstices and 2 equinoxes annually regardless lunar phases which species of plant or animal, predator or prey, asexual, male, female ancestor generationally displaced daily here.

Inorganic matter sustains universal positions perpetually balancing specific locations in the geographical universe while organic results are spaced apart in specific atmospheres located within solar systems inhabiting space among all galaxies revolving around each other as specifically seen in the night sky from the planet life is specifically living to that location and best example is Earth from personal experience of each brain navigating time alive since conceived so far.

Instincts sustain empathy about being alive at the same time regardless which generation gap added to a specific ancestral lineage of the geography of their planet until voluntarily ignored by every generation gap lived in previous 400 generations combined into current events obeying social consensuses cradle to grave ancestrally performed now.