Choke on **** ***.Cannonpointer » 19 Aug 2025, 1:38 pm » wrote: ↑ We were discussing what the NYT said, you stupid queer. You butted in and attributed THEIR position to ME.
I made you aware of this, and you are continuing to argue this non-issue.
I don't give a **** what Brazil says. I care that ONE MEDIOCRE ORANGE was selling for a dollar at wally today. And I care that my coffee jones is about to get twice as expensive to maintain, you loud fool
It is clear that you are a retarded person.
'sup, butt hurt sissy?
You seem upset again. Is Mary fired up ?Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 2:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Not only does nobody know....no one is even asking..
Scrapie ravaged sheep.
Wouldn't this be one of your "Level 4" issues, Level 0.16?
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 2:49 pm » wrote: ↑ Wouldn't this be one of your "Level 4" issues, Level 0.16?
Refer to your definition.Vegas » 20 Aug 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
So you can use it to help you? **** off. Figure it out yourself.
So you can help yourself and stop begging me.Vegas » 20 Aug 2025, 2:54 pm » wrote: ↑ So you can use it to help you? **** off. Figure it out yourself.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Projection. Copies me. Thus, more evidence that he has no thoughts of his own.
You have a definition of Survivorship bias in my own words.Vegas » 20 Aug 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Projection. Copies me. Thus, more evidence that he has no thoughts of his own.
Blackvegetable » 20 Aug 2025, 2:58 pm » wrote: ↑You have a definition of Survivorship bias in my own words.Vegas » 20 Aug 2025, 2:57 pm » wrote: ↑ Projection. Copies me. Thus, more evidence that he has no thoughts of his own.
Where's yours?
Except the why....Huey » 18 Aug 2025, 2:31 pm » wrote: ↑ There is NO Issue with posts on this topic will go to PG.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/07/31/worl ... -lula.html
The 50 percent tariffs President Trump imposed on Brazil this week are some of the highest he has applied on any country this year as he reshapes a global trading system he deems unfair to the United States.
But the United States actually has had a trade surplus with Brazil for over a decade.Instead, Mr. Trump is targeting Brazil largely for political reasons — the prosecution of Jair Bolsonaro, his ally, who is accused of plotting a coup after he lost the last presidential election.
Mr. Trump has called the case a “witch hunt.’’ He is also targeting a Brazilian Supreme Court justice he believes is unfairly censoring conservative voices online.
Yet the tariffs were softened by hundreds of exceptions, including on some of Brazil’s most important exports to the American market, which could make the effect on Brazil’s economy less severe.