Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Clearly reading the OP was too much of a challenge for you.
Why can't you read the OP before queefing?FJB » 22 Aug 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ Why couldn't you answer the question right away? Instead you have to be a dick and deflect.
FJB » 22 Aug 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑ Clearly reading the OP was too much of a challenge for you.
Why couldn't you answer the question right away? Instead you have to be a dick and deflect.
Blackvegetable » 22 Aug 2025, 9:44 am » wrote: ↑Why can't you read the OP before queefing?FJB » 22 Aug 2025, 9:43 am » wrote: ↑ Why couldn't you answer the question right away? Instead you have to be a dick and deflect.
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/
Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 2:51 pm » wrote: ↑No, you're not.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 2:50 pm » wrote: ↑ Still waiting on your definition and what specific assault weapons you are asking about.
You're running scairt...
Day 6.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 3:10 pm » wrote: ↑Since you refuse to specify what assault weapons you are discussing OR define what an assault weapon is I will go with this:Blackvegetable » 16 Aug 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑Post the reason why you FAVOR machine gun regulations but object to assault weapon regulation.*Huey » 16 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ Your idiotic comment I destroyed.
Now check this out. This is like taking a black belt to a gunfight:
Off-duty cop fatally shoots man armed with BB gun after confrontation outside Staten Island diner
https://nypost.com/2025/08/15/us-news/o ... and-diner/1. I have never said I was in FAVOR of machine gun regelations as they stand since 1986
- Military-style features:
Many definitions focus on cosmetic features reminiscent of military firearms, such as pistol grips, folding stocks, flash suppressors, and large-capacity magazines.
2. What you call an assault weapon, and all bans of such, are not based on function but on cosmetic features. Removal of some of those features in some juridictions make them legal BUT they still have the same operation. THey are still nothing more than a semi auto.Acknowledge you were answered.
Speaking of you running.
As long as it isn't Lawfare...JohnnyYou » 22 Aug 2025, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ What's going on at John Bolton's house?
Does he have a copy of the Epstein files?

Minute by Minute.. You keep hanging on...Huey » 20 Aug 2025, 10:36 am » wrote: ↑ WOW! The article is from 2022. I guess your influencers don't have much for you today.