Putin issues formal demands to end Ukraine war after meeting Trump: reportRussian President Vladimir Putin made his demands clear on what it would take for him to cease military operations in Ukraine when speaking with President Donald Trump in Alaska less than one week ago, reports confirmed Thursday.No NATO admittance, no Western troops in Ukraine and hand over the Donbas region — a litany of demands that Moscow has previously stated, but which it formally informed Washington of on Friday, sources familiar with the Kremlin’s negotiations told Reuters. The report also claimed that Putin would agree to freeze the front lines where it currently stands in Kharkiv and Zaporizhzhia, as well as relinquish some territory it has captured in the Kharkiv, Sumy, and Dnipropetrovsk regions. Following the initial invasion in February 2022, Russian forces were able to sweep large sections of territory. But by late summer that year, Ukraine began launching successful counter offenses where it recaptured significant portions of land in Kherson and Kharkiv.But since 2023, the frontlines have remained largely stagnant, with Russia reportedly occupying less than 20 percent of Ukraine — an estimated seven percent of which was previously taken in 2014, when Russia fully occupied Crimea and parts of the Donbas. Russian forces currently occupy some 88 percent of the Donbas, nearly all the Luhansk region and roughly 75 percent of Donetsk, Kherson and Zaporizhzhia.Russian-controlled territory in Sumy and Kharkiv is estimated to equate to roughly 150 sq. miles combined, and a fraction of this in Dnipropetrovsk.
Vegas » 21 Aug 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Putin's demands are not unreasonable. No NATO at his doorstep. What is wrong with that? On the other side of this coin, Putin did mess up. He rarely keeps his word. He says he will go left, then he goes right. He has always been that way. Since his word can't be trusted, then it's pretty pointless for him to make demands, though reasonable, onto anyone.
The US should step out of the way, and let the chips fall where they may.
Putin issues formal demands to end Ukraine war after meeting Trump: report
No NATO admittance, no Western troops in Ukraine and hand over the Donbas region — a litany of demands that Moscow has previously stated, but which it formally informed Washington of on Friday, sources familiar with the Kremlin’s negotiations told Reuters.///-------------------------------------------Vegas » 21 Aug 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Putin's demands are not unreasonable. No NATO at his doorstep. What is wrong with that? On the other side of this coin, Putin did mess up. He rarely keeps his word. He says he will go left, then he goes right. He has always been that way. Since his word can't be trusted, then it's pretty pointless for him to make demands, though reasonable, onto anyone.
The US should step out of the way, and let the chips fall where they may.
Putin issues formal demands to end Ukraine war after meeting Trump: report
NATO was created to counter the Soviet Union, which no longer exists. NATO has been screwing (financially) the USA for a very long time. The alliance is outdated and no longer reflects the geopolitical realities of the 21st century. Leaving NATO could give the U.S. more freedom to pursue its own foreign policy without being bound by collective defense obligations. **** NATO.Vegas » 21 Aug 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Putin's demands are not unreasonable. No NATO at his doorstep. What is wrong with that? On the other side of this coin, Putin did mess up. He rarely keeps his word. He says he will go left, then he goes right. He has always been that way. Since his word can't be trusted, then it's pretty pointless for him to make demands, though reasonable, onto anyone.
The US should step out of the way, and let the chips fall where they may.
Putin issues formal demands to end Ukraine war after meeting Trump: report
MR-7 » 21 Aug 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ NATO was created to counter the Soviet Union, which no longer exists. NATO has been screwing (financially) the USA for a very long time. The alliance is outdated and no longer reflects the geopolitical realities of the 21st century. Leaving NATO could give the U.S. more freedom to pursue its own foreign policy without being bound by collective defense obligations. **** NATO.
Name one.Vegas » 21 Aug 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ Putin's demands are not unreasonable. No NATO at his doorstep. What is wrong with that? On the other side of this coin, Putin did mess up. He rarely keeps his word. He says he will go left, then he goes right. He has always been that way. Since his word can't be trusted, then it's pretty pointless for him to make demands, though reasonable, onto anyone.
The US overthrew the government of Coupkraine, armed it, trained itr, funded it, and provided it with mercenaries, intelligence, and materiel in order to use it as a battering ram against Russia. Then it imposed an enormous and escalating regime of sanctions. Europe stole its external sovereign wealth. And ALL of this was planned WAAAY in advance in policy papers from right wing think tanks.Vegas » 21 Aug 2025, 2:55 pm » wrote: ↑ The US should step out of the way, and let the chips fall where they may.
Trump sandwiched biden on this ****.jerrab » 21 Aug 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ he has always said no to nato.
I agree this was bungled by biden and I said so at the time.
trump kept it up.
So are you on the Epstein List Dude?Cannonpointer » 21 Aug 2025, 7:18 pm » wrote: ↑ Nam eone.
One lie Putin told, one time Russia broke its word.
Name one.
The territories Russia has LIBERATED - not captured - were in rebellion against the coup government imposed on them by washington dc. The rebellion was in response to ethnic/linguistic discrimination by the illegal coup government. The discrimination took many forms, from outlawing the Russian language in violation of the overthrown Constitution to the murder of citizens by government-funded paramilitary vigilantes sporting nazi insignia.jerrab » 21 Aug 2025, 3:30 pm » wrote: ↑ No NATO admittance, no Western troops in Ukraine and hand over the Donbas region — a litany of demands that Moscow has previously stated, but which it formally informed Washington of on Friday, sources familiar with the Kremlin’s negotiations told Reuters.///-------------------------------------------
maybe at least make it fair to donbas and have a security council there for grievances.
Thank you for reminding me how stupid you are.JohnnyYou » 21 Aug 2025, 7:23 pm » wrote: ↑ So are you on the Epstein List Dude?
AI OverviewMultiple sources indicate that Russian President Vladimir Putin has made public statements contradicted by available evidence
.
Here are a few notable examples:While some of Putin's statements are based on factual events but present a skewed or incomplete narrative, others are demonstrably false and are considered a form of propaganda used to further the Kremlin's objectives, according to sources like the no spam .
- Denial of Russian involvement in the 2016 US election: Despite multiple probes, including reports from Special Counsel Robert Mueller and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, finding evidence of Russian interference, Putin has denied any Russian involvement.
- Falsehoods about Ukraine and the invasion:
- Putin and the Russian government have repeatedly claimed the invasion is to "denazify" Ukraine and that Russia is under attack, not the other way around. However, there is no evidence Ukraine is a Nazi state, and Russia initiated the invasion.
- Five days after Russian tanks crossed the border, the Russian embassy in Canada tweeted a false denial of any occupation, no spam .
- Claiming Poland collaborated with Hitler: Putin stated that Poland collaborated with Hitler and pushed him to start World War Two, a claim widely considered historically inaccurate and denied by Poland.
- Denial of Russian involvement in the downing of Flight MH17: Despite a UN-backed investigation concluding a Russian missile brought down the plane, Putin denied any Russian involvement.
- Claiming Russian forces in Crimea were only protecting military assets: Evidence, including Russian military license plates on vehicles used by these forces, suggested they were indeed Russian security services, not "citizens' defense groups".
- Fabricated claims of humanitarian crisis in Ukraine in 2014: Putin alleged a humanitarian crisis and a flood of Ukrainian asylum seekers into Russia. This was refuted by international organizations and journalists on the ground.
- Claims of ethnic Russians being under threat in Ukraine (2014): There were no credible reports outside of Russian press of ethnic Russians facing threats in Ukraine.
- Assertions about Ukrainian statehood and history: Putin has made historical claims denying the existence of a separate Ukrainian nation, portraying it as an artificial creation of Soviet planners. These claims are considered by historians to be distortions of historical facts, intended to justify Russia's geopolitical aims.
Neither of us have time for the bullshyt.Cannonpointer » 21 Aug 2025, 7:36 pm » wrote: ↑ Thank you for reminding me how stupid you are.
Pick one or two of those lies that you think you can defend. Or are you just spamming?
Wait. I already know. Never mind.
If any OTHER propaganda swillers thinks he can defend any of that AI-generated gish gallop, step right up. I'm not spending an hour answering spam that a lightweight took 3 seconds to google up.
You're aloser, son. You have no center and no bottom. You're just a noggin disassociated from the body it tops.JohnnyYou » 21 Aug 2025, 7:37 pm » wrote: ↑ Neither of us have time for the bullshyt.
Are you on the Epstein List? 9 out of 10 accusers should be the accused.
I heard the white cracker smokers are cracking up that Cracker Barrel removed the old white dude by the barrel from the logo.
It comes with the quantum guruism..Cannonpointer » 21 Aug 2025, 7:41 pm » wrote: ↑ You're aloser, son. You have no center and no bottom. You're just a noggin disassociated from the body it tops.
you are right but zelinski will not let russia keep donbasCannonpointer » 21 Aug 2025, 7:31 pm » wrote: ↑ The territories Russia has LIBERATED - not captured - were in rebellion against the coup government imposed on them by washington dc. The rebellion was in response to ethnic/linguistic discrimination by the illegal coup government. The discrimination took many forms, from outlawing the Russian language in violation of the overthrown Constitution to the murder of citizens by government-funded paramilitary vigilantes sporting nazi insignia.
The territory's vote, according to precedent (google kosovo), must be respected by all nations, as the people of that region have a right recognized by the ICC to vote themselves out of Coupkraine. They did so. The conversation is over - and there are Russian missiles and drones and infantry men (not infantry trannies) to back that vote up.
Everyone reading this who doesn't like it can suck it - it's going to stand, and your ****** government's tranny soldiers can't do **** about it.
Yet he makes you look like a double lobotomy recipient...oh wait!
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Yes, even my balls are brains.. Big Balls can't beat me.ROG62 » 21 Aug 2025, 8:42 pm » wrote: ↑ Yet he makes you look like a double lobotomy recipient...oh wait!
I think we should shoot stupid people.MR-7 » 21 Aug 2025, 3:43 pm » wrote: ↑ NATO was created to counter the Soviet Union, which no longer exists. NATO has been screwing (financially) the USA for a very long time. The alliance is outdated and no longer reflects the geopolitical realities of the 21st century. Leaving NATO could give the U.S. more freedom to pursue its own foreign policy without being bound by collective defense obligations. **** NATO.