Liberal Forum

The usual suspects.

Trump Looks to Chicago Next in Federal Crackdown on Crime
(Full article at above link)

Chicago will likely be the next target in the Trump administration’s crackdown on crime, the president said Friday, prompting pushback from city and state leaders who called the possible deployment of National Guard troops an overreach of federal power. “Chicago’s a mess,” President Trump said Friday. “We’ll straighten that one out probably next.” And then, he added, “we’ll help with New York.” The Trump administration deployed National Guard troops to Washington D.C., this month and to Los Angeles earlier this year. The president describes the tactics as part of an effort to make cities safer. These actions have elicited questions over the role of military power on U.S. soil and criticism from local Democratic leaders. When asked by a reporter, Trump said he hadn’t taken steps to bring the crackdown to Chicago. “When we’re ready, we’ll go in and we’ll straighten out Chicago, just like we did D.C.,” Trump said.
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said Friday that city leaders haven’t heard from the Trump administration about the possible deployment of federal law enforcement. Johnson pushed back on the president’s comments and said crimes, including homicides, robberies and shootings, have declined in the city over the past year. (LIAR! - Punch)
“There are many things the federal government could do to help us reduce crime and violence in Chicago, but sending in the military is not one of them,” Johnson said. (Too bad! -Punch)
 

That’s gonna be a challenge

BuckNaked » 23 Aug 2025, 4:37 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 4:37 pm

That’s gonna be a challenge

It could get bloody. Benjamin Crump is probably beating his monkey meat just thinking about it. I wish someone would assassinate him. If my health was better, I'd do it. Johnson is also an out and out racist. And a total failure as mayor, of course.

Good, get rid of all the ***.

It's not hard. Criminals hate being shot back at. They run like little bitches.

murdock » 23 Aug 2025, 5:50 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 5:50 pm

Good, get rid of all the ***.

Impossible, I'm afraid. They breed too much. I propose that if they are on welfare, after two kids they should be sterilized or receive no additional benefits. They are literally stealing tax payer dollars.

youtube /watch?v=7km4EHgkQiw

Punch » 23 Aug 2025, 7:54 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 7:54 pm

Impossible, I'm afraid. They breed too much. I propose that if they are on welfare, after two kids they should be sterilized or receive no additional benefits. They are literally stealing tax payer dollars.

As long as they abort at least one of them.

DeezerShoove » 23 Aug 2025, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 9:19 pm

As long as they abort at least one of them.

There's no way I can make it down that ramp


youtube /watch?v=ign_vZupjno

i know trickynometry ain't your thing

If @Deezer Shoove   falls.. We all do..

@Deezer Shoove   how old are you?  You seem to be an infant bot

not much more cognizant than the crap on murdcocks face
 
 

Maybe you're the crack pipe


youtu.be/w8fXE7O6_B4?si=-WDK47Tu58n-PdGT

JohnnyYou » 23 Aug 2025, 9:28 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 9:28 pm

@Deezer Shoove   how old are you?  You seem to be an infant bot

not much more cognizant than the crap on murdcocks face

For someone posting in such a childish manner to say that is laughable.

Didn't you try to "take over this place" a few weeks ago? Whatever the hell that means...
If being a pest is your goal, no wonder you were put in diapers.
That's what happens when someone has lost control of their basic functions.

Calm down. Attacking me tantrum-like will do you no good. Grow up some.

DeezerShoove » 23 Aug 2025, 9:48 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 9:48 pm

For someone posting in such a childish manner to say that is laughable.

Didn't you try to "take over this place" a few weeks ago? Whatever the hell that means...
If being a pest is your goal, no wonder you were put in diapers.
That's what happens when someone has lost control of their basic functions.

Calm down. Attacking me tantrum-like will do you no good. Grow up some.

youtube /watch?v=vkR7u_sOtHI

You're Epstein or Sixteen

Kid Gloves


youtube /watch?v=RtXGobX3sZs

Punch » 23 Aug 2025, 3:27 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 3:27 pm

The usual suspects.

Trump Looks to Chicago Next in Federal Crackdown on Crime
(Full article at above link)

Chicago will likely be the next target in the Trump administration’s crackdown on crime, the president said Friday, prompting pushback from city and state leaders who called the possible deployment of National Guard troops an overreach of federal power. “Chicago’s a mess,” President Trump said Friday. “We’ll straighten that one out probably next.” And then, he added, “we’ll help with New York.” The Trump administration deployed National Guard troops to Washington D.C., this month and to Los Angeles earlier this year. The president describes the tactics as part of an effort to make cities safer. These actions have elicited questions over the role of military power on U.S. soil and criticism from local Democratic leaders. When asked by a reporter, Trump said he hadn’t taken steps to bring the crackdown to Chicago. “When we’re ready, we’ll go in and we’ll straighten out Chicago, just like we did D.C.,” Trump said.
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson said Friday that city leaders haven’t heard from the Trump administration about the possible deployment of federal law enforcement. Johnson pushed back on the president’s comments and said crimes, including homicides, robberies and shootings, have declined in the city over the past year. (LIAR! - Punch)
“There are many things the federal government could do to help us reduce crime and violence in Chicago, but sending in the military is not one of them,” Johnson said. (Too bad! -Punch)

I have mixed feelings about martial law in the skreets of Murkin ****. But I DO want to opine as follows:

1. "crime is declining" is a snapshot - not a moving picture. The very first question that has to be answered is, "Decling from WHAT, and by what margin, and how fast?" DC could honestly say that crime was "declining" - but it was declining from a banner year that was a horror show. Fun with numbers. 
2. Somebody gotta do SOMETHIN. *** be running wild as a ****. In chi-town, they're attacking and throwing bleach on THEMSELVES (google, Jussie Smollet). 
 

Cannonpointer » 23 Aug 2025, 11:09 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 11:09 pm

I have mixed feeling about martial law in the skreets of Murkin ****. But I DO want to opine as follows:

1. "crime is declining" is a snapshot - not a moving picture. The very first question that has to be answered is, "Decling from WHAT, and by what margin, and how fast?" DC could honestly say that crime was "declining" - but it was declining from a banner year that was a horror show. Fun with numbers. 
2. Somebody gotta do SOMETHIN. *** be running wild as a ****. In chi-town, they're attacking and throwing bleach on THEMSELVES (google, Jussie Smollet).

k

youtube /watch?v=wT9XlQi0yew

DeezerShoove » 23 Aug 2025, 9:19 pm » wrote: ↑

23 Aug 2025, 9:19 pm

As long as they abort at least one of them.

If they don't, Mickey Dee's will run out of monkey meat to feed them.