Mrkelly » 27 Aug 2025, 9:11 am » wrote: ↑ But, as we know
the people that should watch it
wont
https://youtu.be/rIO4IDMnBDU?si=MKJeLp6WEIyZgrKT
Let's investigate how you arrived there...Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 9:38 am » wrote: ↑ Awesome. Video. I joined this channel a while back.
@Blackvegetable this whole video encapsulates you.
He is already turning it on me. He won't even bother watching the video.Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2025, 9:52 am » wrote: ↑ Let's investigate how you arrived there...
First we must ask what you mean by it "encapsulating" me...
I watched enough to understand what it considers the prescription for Stupid.Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑ He is already turning it on me. He won't even bother watching the video.
Just like @Mrkelly predicted.
Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ I watched enough to understand what it considers the prescription for Stupid.
Everything you melt down over.
Now let's proceed with this exercise.
You didn't watch anything.Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2025, 9:59 am » wrote: ↑ I watched enough to understand what it considers the prescription for Stupid.
https://survivingnarcissism.co.uk/blame ... hatgpt.com
- Deflection of accountability – If they’re called out, rather than address the issue, they’ll redirect it back to you so they don’t have to face responsibility.
- Control of the narrative – By turning the focus around, they stay in charge of the conversation and avoid losing ground.
- Projection – They often accuse others of the very flaws they’re guilty of (lying, selfishness, manipulation). It’s a psychological smoke bomb.
- Emotional manipulation – It puts the other person on the defensive, making you explain or justify yourself instead of holding them accountable.
- Fragile ego protection – Even minor criticism can feel like an attack to them, so flipping it back is a defense mechanism to protect their inflated self-image.
Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ I would suggest that this
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=66125
is a perfect example of what the video recommends....and debunks the potentially negative implications of @Vegas ' vague slander.
A principled refusal to look at evidence is not one of the solutions to the problem.Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 10:07 am » wrote: ↑ Didn't click it. I will not entertain your stalking.
1. The usual prediction
Just as predicted. 100% accuracy.Blackvegetable » 27 Aug 2025, 10:10 am » wrote: ↑ A principled refusal to look at evidence is not one of the solutions to the problem.
What does the video say about Questions?Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ You didn't watch anything.
And **** your hiding. You aren't hiding behind you usual turning it on me crap.
Textbook narcissism. This is why you do that
You're insisting that your unsupported assertion be accepted, uncritically...
and hiding behind a question. Just as predicted.
- Deflection of accountability – If they’re called out, rather than address the issue, they’ll redirect it back to you so they don’t have to face responsibility.
- Control of the narrative – By turning the focus around, they stay in charge of the conversation and avoid losing ground.
- Projection – They often accuse others of the very flaws they’re guilty of (lying, selfishness, manipulation). It’s a psychological smoke bomb.
- Emotional manipulation – It puts the other person on the defensive, making you explain or justify yourself instead of holding them accountable.
- Fragile ego protection – Even minor criticism can feel like an attack to them, so flipping it back is a defense mechanism to protect their inflated self-image.
it's your assertion.Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ and hiding behind a question. Just as predicted.
Still trying to turn it on me.
I didn't assert anything.
So endeth this effort at "Critical Thinking"...Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑ I didn't assert anything.
**** your questions. **** your hiding.
Hiding behind a demand....next you will continue to hide behind a question...then you will turn it on me again.
Here's another example.Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑ Hiding behind a demand....next you will continue to hide behind a question...then you will turn it on me again.
Always hiding. Always.