10 U.S.C. 333: When Can Federal Troops Be Deployed?Notable historical applications include President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s 1957 deployment of the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce federal desegregation orders and President John F. Kennedy’s 1962 intervention at the University of Mississippi to ensure James Meredith’s enrollment despite violent resistance. These instances demonstrate the federal government’s role in upholding constitutional protections when states fail to act.Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ It is illegal for the president to deploy federal law enforcement into other cities other than DC. DC is under the jurisdiction of the federal government.
However, some cities have been a cesspool of violent crime for decades. The states governors don't do anything. Should there be a point where we say enough is enough? Clean up these damn places.
MR-7 » 27 Aug 2025, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑ 10 U.S.C. 333: When Can Federal Troops Be Deployed?Notable historical applications include President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s 1957 deployment of the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce federal desegregation orders and President John F. Kennedy’s 1962 intervention at the University of Mississippi to ensure James Meredith’s enrollment despite violent resistance. These instances demonstrate the federal government’s role in upholding constitutional protections when states fail to act.
Beyond civil rights enforcement, federal troops have been deployed in response to large-scale riots and natural disasters that overwhelm state and local authorities. In 1992, President George H.W. Bush sent military forces to Los Angeles following the Rodney King riots, citing the inability of local law enforcement to restore order. While the Posse Comitatus Act generally restricts military involvement in domestic law enforcement, 10 U.S.C. 333 provides a legal pathway when public safety is at risk and state resources are insufficient.
Yur funnyWell are you trolling to see if dems are planning anything?Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ It is illegal for the president to deploy federal law enforcement into other cities other than DC. DC is under the jurisdiction of the federal government.
However, some cities have been a cesspool of violent crime for decades. The states governors don't do anything. Should there be a point where we say enough is enough? Clean up these damn places.
But I believe Trump wants to just clean up the crime in general in some cities. It's not in response to a riot or any one major event.MR-7 » 27 Aug 2025, 4:43 pm » wrote: ↑ 10 U.S.C. 333: When Can Federal Troops Be Deployed?Notable historical applications include President Dwight D. Eisenhower’s 1957 deployment of the 101st Airborne Division to Little Rock, Arkansas, to enforce federal desegregation orders and President John F. Kennedy’s 1962 intervention at the University of Mississippi to ensure James Meredith’s enrollment despite violent resistance. These instances demonstrate the federal government’s role in upholding constitutional protections when states fail to act.
Beyond civil rights enforcement, federal troops have been deployed in response to large-scale riots and natural disasters that overwhelm state and local authorities. In 1992, President George H.W. Bush sent military forces to Los Angeles following the Rodney King riots, citing the inability of local law enforcement to restore order. While the Posse Comitatus Act generally restricts military involvement in domestic law enforcement, 10 U.S.C. 333 provides a legal pathway when public safety is at risk and state resources are insufficient.
michaelf » 27 Aug 2025, 8:06 pm » wrote: ↑ Chicago is a **** run by gangs and plagued by drive-by shootings. SEND IN THE TROOPS! Should have been done 60 years ago!
Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 7:32 pm » wrote: ↑ But I believe Trump wants to just clean up the crime in general in some cities. It's not in response to a riot or any one major event.
So? Send in the troops.
Whose? Putin's or Kim Jong Un's???
Another example of a Democrat that manipulates statistics to try and shade the facts.....the real fact is that contained within those red states are blue cities full of ghetto trash that have Democrat mayors....you and BV are the enemy of truth.
Exactly. Most violent crimes are done major liberal cities.RebelGator » 28 Aug 2025, 6:24 am » wrote: ↑ Another example of a Democrat that manipulates statistics to try and shade the facts.....the real fact is that contained within those red states are blue cities full of ghetto trash that have Democrat mayors....you and BV are the enemy of truth.
*Huey » 28 Aug 2025, 11:00 am » wrote: ↑ And out of those six who is running the cities driving those numbers?
Is it even possible for his hypocrisy reach a higher plane?But you refuse to answer them.
I say leave it up to the citizens... IF they citizens of a certain city WANT safe streets... then THAT should "TRUMP" corrupt politicians !!Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ It is illegal for the president to deploy federal law enforcement into other cities other than DC. DC is under the jurisdiction of the federal government.
However, some cities have been a cesspool of violent crime for decades. The states governors don't do anything. Should there be a point where we say enough is enough? Clean up these damn places.
Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ It is illegal for the president to deploy federal law enforcement into other cities other than DC. DC is under the jurisdiction of the federal government.
However, some cities have been a cesspool of violent crime for decades. The states governors don't do anything. Should there be a point where we say enough is enough? Clean up these damn places.

how many levels of governance are there in humanity controlling ancestral outcomes daily so far between personally adapting to the moment and arriving in hell or heaven after personally dead?Vegas » 27 Aug 2025, 1:47 pm » wrote: ↑ It is illegal for the president to deploy federal law enforcement into other cities other than DC. DC is under the jurisdiction of the federal government.
However, some cities have been a cesspool of violent crime for decades. The states governors don't do anything. Should there be a point where we say enough is enough? Clean up these damn places.