Donald Trump and administration officials violated the law by deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles in response to protests against his anti-immigration agenda, a federal judge in California ruled.The president’s troop deployment violated the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which prohibits “the use of the U.S. military to execute domestic law,” according to Tuesday’s decision from District Judge Charles Breyer.Nearly 140 years later, Trump and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth deployed the National Guard and a cadre of U.S. Marines to Los Angeles, “ostensibly to quell a rebellion and ensure that federal immigration law was enforced,” Breyer wrote.“There were indeed protests in Los Angeles, and some individuals engaged in violence. Yet there was no rebellion, nor was civilian law enforcement unable to respond to the protests and enforce the law,” he added.Following a brief bench trial last month, the judge determined that the administration illegally and “systematically used armed soldiers (whose identity was often obscured by protective armor) and military vehicles to set up protective perimeters and traffic blockades, engage in crowd control, and otherwise demonstrate a military presence in and around Los Angeles.”“In short, Defendants violated the Posse Comitatus Act,” Breyer wrote.Trump illegally sent National Guard to Los Angeles, federal judge rules
The left doesn't care if innocent people get hurt or killed. This is all about power to the commie dems.Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ I am not a fan of the federal government infringing on the state. But can we be reasonable? The citizens of LA need protection. The city, and state, have an obligation to protect their communities. The governors and mayors have repeatedly failed at this for decades. They aren't doing their job. Why should the safety of innocent civilians and small businesses be jeopardized because the state won't fulfill their obligations to which their constituents demanded?
It amazes me how brainwashed some people are.roadkill » 02 Sep 2025, 11:39 am » wrote: ↑ The left doesn't care if innocent people get hurt or killed. This is all about power to the commie dems.
The dems are useless, corrupt, and dangerous due to their agenda and stupidity.
Enjoy some traditional values...
roadkill » 02 Sep 2025, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑ Enjoy some traditional values...![]()
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/scXyIf81zns
Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ I am not a fan of the federal government infringing on the state. But can we be reasonable? The citizens of LA need protection. The city, and state, have an obligation to protect their communities. The governors and mayors have repeatedly failed at this for decades. They aren't doing their job. Why should the safety of innocent civilians and small businesses be jeopardized because the state won't fulfill their obligations to which their constituents demanded?
Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ I am not a fan of the federal government infringing on the state. But can we be reasonable? The citizens of LA need protection. The city, and state, have an obligation to protect their communities. The governors and mayors have repeatedly failed at this for decades. They aren't doing their job. Why should the safety of innocent civilians and small businesses be jeopardized because the state won't fulfill their obligations to which their constituents demanded?
I see you didn't read past the first sentence. Yep. You have definitely been taking lessons from @BlackvegetableMrkelly » 02 Sep 2025, 4:00 pm » wrote: ↑“I am not a fan of the federal government infringing on the state”
It seems that you are
Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑ I see you didn't read past the first sentence. Yep. You have definitely been taking lessons from @Blackvegetable![]()
![]()
Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 4:01 pm » wrote: ↑ I see you didn't read past the first sentence. Yep. You have definitely been taking lessons from @Blackvegetable![]()
![]()
I can always count on a libtard being in favor of violent crime. ^^^Mrkelly » 02 Sep 2025, 4:04 pm » wrote: ↑Sure I did
thats why I said “it sure seems like you are”
IM FROM THE GOVERNMENT, AND IM HERE TO HELP
atta boyVegas » 02 Sep 2025, 4:17 pm » wrote: ↑ I can always count on a libtard being in favor of violent crime. ^^^
Mrkelly » 02 Sep 2025, 4:24 pm » wrote: ↑ atta boy
nice talking point you have there
reminds me of this gem
“If you have nothing to hide, then you don’t have to worry about the patriot act”
![]()
“I’m from the government, and I’m here to help”
works every time
for some
Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 4:27 pm » wrote: ↑ Not my quote.
I see you are deflecting though. Well done.![]()
Let's try this again. I will rearrange the words a little for you to simplify: Governors and mayors allowing violent crime = bad.
That better?
OKOne federal judge in a communist breakaway state means absolutely nothing.Vegas » 02 Sep 2025, 11:30 am » wrote: ↑ I am not a fan of the federal government infringing on the state. But can we be reasonable? The citizens of LA need protection. The city, and state, have an obligation to protect their communities. The governors and mayors have repeatedly failed at this for decades. They aren't doing their job. Why should the safety of innocent civilians and small businesses be jeopardized because the state won't fulfill their obligations to which their constituents demanded?
So you aren't going to answer the question. Ok got it. BV taught you well.Mrkelly » 02 Sep 2025, 4:35 pm » wrote: ↑OK
I will do the same
Governors and mayors not allowing armed troops in their city = good
We are ALL gaslighted about a whole bunch of ****.
Cannonpointer » 02 Sep 2025, 7:15 pm » wrote: ↑ We are ALL gaslighted about a whole bunch of ****.
When you spot ten lies, don't think that means you're not buying twenty more.
Many of the people we THINK are truth tellers are giving us 90% truth just to sneak 10% lies in on us.