Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 03 Sep 2025, 8:27 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 8:27 pm

Nope. Ibought her beer and cigarettes. That's enough.

Only leftist **** stains edit someone's post to change the meaning. The epitome of lame cowardice...
 

murdock » 03 Sep 2025, 8:29 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 8:29 pm

Only my whore mom's ****** stinks THAT bad...

Hey, you said it, not I...
 

roadkill » 02 Sep 2025, 12:25 pm » wrote: ↑

02 Sep 2025, 12:25 pm

Enjoy some traditional values...      

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/scXyIf81zns

A rare thing these days...gratitude...

JohnnyYou » 03 Sep 2025, 1:31 am » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 1:31 am

And if you can't see Chicago and Baltimore are next you are blind.

Chicago is 80th in the percapita murder rate.  Concentrations of people leads to concentration of crime.  If Chicago had a red state mentality the numbers could be a lot worse based on the per capita data.  Chicago may actually be doing a good fight against the cockroaches of society from some persepectives.

The rural red hats pray to jesus and tithe, only because Mom tells them get out of the basement and off that stupid game controller. On the side they play with the devil and it creates higher per capita crime rates.

Murder's not the only crime, ****...
 

ROG62 » 04 Sep 2025, 6:13 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 6:13 am

Murder's not the only crime, ****...

I know.. and all indications are that domestic crimes are increasing the most.. about 3% on Trump taking office.

Kudos that everything else except corruption that doesn't get caught is going down.  Trump is an idiot.. He could be taking credit. Instead he paint's picture it's getting worse under his admin and needs fixins like turnip greens at QuackUp Barrel. Hotels miss the tourism.. America is Cray Cray in the Eyes of the World.  Don't foriegn visit DC, you'll get transported to the vacation spot of ICE's choosing.

We are crime ridden and he did a darn good job in 6 months.  I ain't going to DC to see the National Guard..  If I buy a Taco at the truck I could end up with MS-13 on my knuckles and in El Slaveador by sundown.

Whatever happened to the homeless folks?  Did they become Soylent Green?  Man you can't fart in DC without fear of retribution.  No wonder crime went to zero.. The Threat of the Police State will make anyone behave... Just like the book 1984...
 
 
Whatever you do, don't get a sub at Subway. They are now lethal weapons.

Mrkelly » 03 Sep 2025, 4:32 pm » wrote: ↑

03 Sep 2025, 4:32 pm

   liberals would cheer about my concerns of tRump over reaching 


 

And this is the point of my OP. ^^^ Right there. Should there be a line drawn about what should be considered overreaching if the leaders of a state are not protecting their own? 

Keep in mind, when Lincoln wanted slavery to end, that was legally considered overreaching on the states. That is why the states seceded. They saw Lincoln as a tyrant infringing on the states rights. Was Lincoln correct? 

Vegas » 04 Sep 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 9:24 am

And this is the point of my OP. ^^^ Right there. Should there be a line drawn about what should be considered overreaching if the leaders of a state are not protecting their own? 

Keep in mind, when Lincoln wanted slavery to end, that was legally considered overreaching on the states. That is why the states seceded. They saw Lincoln as a tyrant infringing on the states rights. Was Lincoln correct?

There was a civil war at the time?  We all know MAGA wants one so the King can postpone losing forever..

JohnnyYou » 04 Sep 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 9:31 am

There was a civil war at the time?  We all know MAGA wants one so the King can postpone losing forever..

Yeah sure. Whatever you say. 

Vegas » 04 Sep 2025, 9:24 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 9:24 am

And this is the point of my OP. ^^^ Right there. Should there be a line drawn about what should be considered overreaching if the leaders of a state are not protecting their own? 

Keep in mind, when Lincoln wanted slavery to end, that was legally considered overreaching on the states. That is why the states seceded. They saw Lincoln as a tyrant infringing on the states rights. Was Lincoln correct?

yes

notice I answered your question 

Do you think that this rises to that level ?

Mrkelly » 04 Sep 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 10:16 am

yes

notice I answered your question 

Do you think that this rises to that level ?

Legally, yes. It is an overreach per the law. Morally, no. It is not an overreach any more than it was morally wrong for Lincoln to break the law regarding infringing on the state's rights. The leaders of the states have an obligation to secure and protect the rights of their citizens. Some states have not only failed, but they don't even have any inclination to make an effort. Therefore, I don't see why it should be morally wrong for the federal government to protect the state's citizens if the state fails to do so. 

Vegas » 04 Sep 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 10:20 am

Legally, yes. It is an overreach per the law. Morally, no. It is not an overreach any more than it was morally wrong for Lincoln to break the law regarding infringing on the state's rights. The leaders of the states have an obligation to secure and protect the rights of their citizens. Some states have not only failed, but they don't even have any inclination to make an effort. Therefore, I don't see why it should be morally wrong for the federal government to protect the state's citizens if the state fails to do so.

  Show me where in the Posse Comitatus act that this rises to the same level as Lincoln was facing 

Mr queerly is a lying **** stain like all leftist scum.

Mrkelly » 04 Sep 2025, 10:25 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 10:25 am

  Show me where in the Posse Comitatus act that this rises to the same level as Lincoln was facing

If we are having a serious conversation, then why are you using laughing emojis? Those are usually reserved when we are all insulting each other, like I do frequently to BV. However, if it is a serious conversation, which I thought we were having, then why should I take you seriously with your laughing emoji? 

Repeat your post without the laughing and then I will take it more seriously. 

Vegas » 04 Sep 2025, 9:35 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 9:35 am

Yeah sure. Whatever you say.

I didn't  say it. Trump said he can suspend  elections and was looking for a reason.


 

Vegas » 04 Sep 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 10:29 am

If we are having a serious conversation, then why are you using laughing emojis? Those are usually reserved when we are all insulting each other, like I do frequently to BV. However, if it is a serious conversation, which I thought we were having, then why should I take you seriously with your laughing emoji? 

Repeat your post without the laughing and then I will take it more seriously.

Grump. Get a life. Live Laugh Love or Hate Hate Hate.. You decide 2026

Vegas » 04 Sep 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 10:29 am

If we are having a serious conversation, then why are you using laughing emojis? Those are usually reserved when we are all insulting each other, like I do frequently to BV. However, if it is a serious conversation, which I thought we were having, then why should I take you seriously with your laughing emoji? 

Repeat your post without the laughing and then I will take it more seriously.

   OK boss

you could have just said that you didn’t want to answer   

 

Vegas » 04 Sep 2025, 10:29 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 10:29 am

If we are having a serious conversation, then why are you using laughing emojis? Those are usually reserved when we are all insulting each other, like I do frequently to BV. However, if it is a serious conversation, which I thought we were having, then why should I take you seriously with your laughing emoji? 

Repeat your post without the laughing and then I will take it more seriously.

  because everything you say is funny to me

Mrkelly » 04 Sep 2025, 11:51 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 11:51 am

  because everything you say is funny to me

Clearly not, since your question appears to be a serious one, but your maturity level about it is that of a child. 

Vegas » 04 Sep 2025, 11:53 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 11:53 am

Clearly not, since your question appears to be a serious one, but your maturity level about it is that of a child.

 

Mrkelly » 04 Sep 2025, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

04 Sep 2025, 11:50 am

   OK boss

you could have just said that you didn’t want to answer 

I'd be happy to answer it, if you were actually serious. Which clearly you aren't. 

Oh...that reminds me, here you go: