Liberal Forum

Why is this late blowhard being eulogized as a Luminary?

He called his own death an "accetable" cost of a ""G*d given" right.

Apparently, G*d agreed.


As for his message, it was high school paper editor cosplay crap..

There are 27 Republican attorneys general in the U.S., compared to 23 Democrats. But you’d hardly know it these days. Today, all the celebrity prosecutors are Democrats. The left has an entire caste of politicians who make their careers by loudly hunting down supposed “wrongdoers,” using whatever excuses they can manufacture. A cabal of prosecutors has existed for a while. In New York, for instance, the attorney general’s office has spent years neutering the National Rifle Association with a legal offensive meant to shut it down or at least entirely disable it as a national political force — an offensive that has mostly succeeded. 

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/ho ... -the-left/


While playing Pootie's fool, Wayne LaPierre was using NRA funds to go on Brioni shopping sprees....

Charlie Kirk was just another MAGAt fabulist...


But the Democrat effort to criminalize their political enemies has reached its climax in 2023. Republicans have sat and watched as four separate indictments have come down from three separate prosecutors, all with the same purpose: imprisoning Donald Trump and as many of his political allies as they can get away with. Monday’s indictment out of Fulton County, Georgia, is the most extreme yet, seeking to ensnare not just Trump but 18 of his associates for the “crime” of contesting the 2020 election through the courts and legislative process. 
  The goal of all these indictments is simple: rig the 2024 election in the court system before a single ballot can even be cast, and criminalize the MAGA political movement Trump has built. 


Ibid.


Kirk was a moron.


“‘Investigate first, define the crimes later’ should be the order of the day,” Kirk declared in an editorial demanding the legal intimidation of anyone associated with the political left. “And for even the most minor of offenses, the rule should be: no charity, no goodwill, no mercy.”

  Speaking last year in support of Trump’s plan for mass deportation, Kirk warned that the incoming president would not tolerate dissent or resistance. “Playtime is over. And if a Democrat gets in our way, well, then Matt Gaetz very well might go arrest you,” he said.


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/opin ... ation.html



"Jesus is my co-pilot, and a louche coke huffing pedo is my AG."

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am

Why is this late blowhard being eulogized as a Luminary?

He called his own death an "accetable" cost of a ""G*d given" right.

Apparently, G*d agreed.


As for his message, it was high school paper editor cosplay crap..

There are 27 Republican attorneys general in the U.S., compared to 23 Democrats. But you’d hardly know it these days. Today, all the celebrity prosecutors are Democrats. The left has an entire caste of politicians who make their careers by loudly hunting down supposed “wrongdoers,” using whatever excuses they can manufacture. A cabal of prosecutors has existed for a while. In New York, for instance, the attorney general’s office has spent years neutering the National Rifle Association with a legal offensive meant to shut it down or at least entirely disable it as a national political force — an offensive that has mostly succeeded. 

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/ho ... -the-left/


While playing Pootie's fool, Wayne LaPierre was using NRA funds to go on Brioni shopping sprees....

Charlie Kirk was just another MAGAt fabulist...


But the Democrat effort to criminalize their political enemies has reached its climax in 2023. Republicans have sat and watched as four separate indictments have come down from three separate prosecutors, all with the same purpose: imprisoning Donald Trump and as many of his political allies as they can get away with. Monday’s indictment out of Fulton County, Georgia, is the most extreme yet, seeking to ensnare not just Trump but 18 of his associates for the “crime” of contesting the 2020 election through the courts and legislative process. 
  The goal of all these indictments is simple: rig the 2024 election in the court system before a single ballot can even be cast, and criminalize the MAGA political movement Trump has built. 


Ibid.


Kirk was a moron.


“‘Investigate first, define the crimes later’ should be the order of the day,” Kirk declared in an editorial demanding the legal intimidation of anyone associated with the political left. “And for even the most minor of offenses, the rule should be: no charity, no goodwill, no mercy.”

  Speaking last year in support of Trump’s plan for mass deportation, Kirk warned that the incoming president would not tolerate dissent or resistance. “Playtime is over. And if a Democrat gets in our way, well, then Matt Gaetz very well might go arrest you,” he said.


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/opin ... ation.html



"Jesus is my co-pilot, and a louche coke huffing pedo is my AG."

 

There, there, Dum Dum, let it all out.



Here is an Idea, go to the Salem NH Political page, and post your ramblings using your real name.  Show us you got balls, Dum Dum.

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am

Why is this late blowhard being eulogized as a Luminary?

He called his own death an "accetable" cost of a ""G*d given" right.

Apparently, G*d agreed.

As for his message, it was high school paper editor cosplay crap..

There are 27 Republican attorneys general in the U.S., compared to 23 Democrats. But you’d hardly know it these days. Today, all the celebrity prosecutors are Democrats. The left has an entire caste of politicians who make their careers by loudly hunting down supposed “wrongdoers,” using whatever excuses they can manufacture. A cabal of prosecutors has existed for a while. In New York, for instance, the attorney general’s office has spent years neutering the National Rifle Association with a legal offensive meant to shut it down or at least entirely disable it as a national political force — an offensive that has mostly succeeded. 

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/ho ... -the-left/

While playing Pootie's fool, Wayne LaPierre was using NRA funds to go on Brioni shopping sprees....

Charlie Kirk was just another MAGAt fabulist...

But the Democrat effort to criminalize their political enemies has reached its climax in 2023. Republicans have sat and watched as four separate indictments have come down from three separate prosecutors, all with the same purpose: imprisoning Donald Trump and as many of his political allies as they can get away with. Monday’s indictment out of Fulton County, Georgia, is the most extreme yet, seeking to ensnare not just Trump but 18 of his associates for the “crime” of contesting the 2020 election through the courts and legislative process. 
  The goal of all these indictments is simple: rig the 2024 election in the court system before a single ballot can even be cast, and criminalize the MAGA political movement Trump has built. 

Ibid.

Kirk was a moron.

“‘Investigate first, define the crimes later’ should be the order of the day,” Kirk declared in an editorial demanding the legal intimidation of anyone associated with the political left. “And for even the most minor of offenses, the rule should be: no charity, no goodwill, no mercy.”

  Speaking last year in support of Trump’s plan for mass deportation, Kirk warned that the incoming president would not tolerate dissent or resistance. “Playtime is over. And if a Democrat gets in our way, well, then Matt Gaetz very well might go arrest you,” he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/opin ... ation.html

"Jesus is my co-pilot, and a louche coke huffing pedo is my AG."

You wouldn't make a pimple on Charlie Kirk's ***......he would dispatch your nonsense in a nano-second. He regularly debated and destroyed leftist professors and their offspring......because he also believed in God, isn't that the real reason for your diatribe......that you're a spawn of Satan?

RebelGator » 15 Sep 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:41 am

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am

Why is this late blowhard being eulogized as a Luminary?

He called his own death an "accetable" cost of a ""G*d given" right.

Apparently, G*d agreed.

As for his message, it was high school paper editor cosplay crap..

There are 27 Republican attorneys general in the U.S., compared to 23 Democrats. But you’d hardly know it these days. Today, all the celebrity prosecutors are Democrats. The left has an entire caste of politicians who make their careers by loudly hunting down supposed “wrongdoers,” using whatever excuses they can manufacture. A cabal of prosecutors has existed for a while. In New York, for instance, the attorney general’s office has spent years neutering the National Rifle Association with a legal offensive meant to shut it down or at least entirely disable it as a national political force — an offensive that has mostly succeeded. 

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/ho ... -the-left/

While playing Pootie's fool, Wayne LaPierre was using NRA funds to go on Brioni shopping sprees....

Charlie Kirk was just another MAGAt fabulist...

But the Democrat effort to criminalize their political enemies has reached its climax in 2023. Republicans have sat and watched as four separate indictments have come down from three separate prosecutors, all with the same purpose: imprisoning Donald Trump and as many of his political allies as they can get away with. Monday’s indictment out of Fulton County, Georgia, is the most extreme yet, seeking to ensnare not just Trump but 18 of his associates for the “crime” of contesting the 2020 election through the courts and legislative process. 
  The goal of all these indictments is simple: rig the 2024 election in the court system before a single ballot can even be cast, and criminalize the MAGA political movement Trump has built. 

Ibid.

Kirk was a moron.

“‘Investigate first, define the crimes later’ should be the order of the day,” Kirk declared in an editorial demanding the legal intimidation of anyone associated with the political left. “And for even the most minor of offenses, the rule should be: no charity, no goodwill, no mercy.”

  Speaking last year in support of Trump’s plan for mass deportation, Kirk warned that the incoming president would not tolerate dissent or resistance. “Playtime is over. And if a Democrat gets in our way, well, then Matt Gaetz very well might go arrest you,” he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/opin ... ation.html

"Jesus is my co-pilot, and a louche coke huffing pedo is my AG."

You wouldn't make a pimple on Charlie Kirk's ***......he would dispatch your nonsense in a nano-second. He regularly debated and destroyed leftist professors and their offspring......because he also believed in God, isn't that the real reason for your diatribe......that you're a spawn of Satan?

 

He is really really dumb an is simply trying to piss people off. That's all.  Don't let him.

 

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am

Why is this late blowhard being eulogized as a Luminary?

He called his own death an "accetable" cost of a ""G*d given" right.

Apparently, G*d agreed.


As for his message, it was high school paper editor cosplay crap..

There are 27 Republican attorneys general in the U.S., compared to 23 Democrats. But you’d hardly know it these days. Today, all the celebrity prosecutors are Democrats. The left has an entire caste of politicians who make their careers by loudly hunting down supposed “wrongdoers,” using whatever excuses they can manufacture. A cabal of prosecutors has existed for a while. In New York, for instance, the attorney general’s office has spent years neutering the National Rifle Association with a legal offensive meant to shut it down or at least entirely disable it as a national political force — an offensive that has mostly succeeded. 

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/ho ... -the-left/


While playing Pootie's fool, Wayne LaPierre was using NRA funds to go on Brioni shopping sprees....

Charlie Kirk was just another MAGAt fabulist...


But the Democrat effort to criminalize their political enemies has reached its climax in 2023. Republicans have sat and watched as four separate indictments have come down from three separate prosecutors, all with the same purpose: imprisoning Donald Trump and as many of his political allies as they can get away with. Monday’s indictment out of Fulton County, Georgia, is the most extreme yet, seeking to ensnare not just Trump but 18 of his associates for the “crime” of contesting the 2020 election through the courts and legislative process. 
  The goal of all these indictments is simple: rig the 2024 election in the court system before a single ballot can even be cast, and criminalize the MAGA political movement Trump has built. 


Ibid.


Kirk was a moron.


“‘Investigate first, define the crimes later’ should be the order of the day,” Kirk declared in an editorial demanding the legal intimidation of anyone associated with the political left. “And for even the most minor of offenses, the rule should be: no charity, no goodwill, no mercy.”

  Speaking last year in support of Trump’s plan for mass deportation, Kirk warned that the incoming president would not tolerate dissent or resistance. “Playtime is over. And if a Democrat gets in our way, well, then Matt Gaetz very well might go arrest you,” he said.


https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/opin ... ation.html



"Jesus is my co-pilot, and a louche coke huffing pedo is my AG."

 

Dum Dum, the initial impression that the left would kill some for simply speaking in opposition is out there, true or not. Those that CK was trying to reach are in may cases rethinking their ideology.  Those that aren't but are "normal" at least see what happened here.  Then you got the Dum Dums, those that support this.  and all of that is being seen.  

You can rant, rave, stomp your feet, hold your breath until you turn blue, and whine with cherry picked sentences from a much larger quote.  

You chose a side.  You better figure out how to fix it.

RebelGator » 15 Sep 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:41 am

You wouldn't make a pimple on Charlie Kirk's ***......he would dispatch your nonsense in a nano-second. He regularly debated and destroyed leftist professors and their offspring......because he also believed in God, isn't that the real reason for your diatribe......that you're a spawn of Satan?

He regularly debated and destroyed leftist professors

Show me.

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 10:51 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:51 am

RebelGator » 15 Sep 2025, 10:41 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:41 am

You wouldn't make a pimple on Charlie Kirk's ***......he would dispatch your nonsense in a nano-second. He regularly debated and destroyed leftist professors and their offspring......because he also believed in God, isn't that the real reason for your diatribe......that you're a spawn of Satan?

He regularly debated and destroyed leftist professors

Show me.

 

Is your google broke?  Must be, you can't even get the quotes right.

Charlie Kirk's wife and 2 little kids (1 and 3) do not deserve what this ****** leftist asshole did. I wonder how he would like it if his whole family and friends were murdered.

PhiloBeddo » 15 Sep 2025, 11:50 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 11:50 am

Charlie Kirk's wife and 2 little kids (1 and 3) do not deserve what this ****** leftist asshole did. I wonder how he would like it if his whole family and friends were murdered.

 

As far as his family I don't think he would care.  

Trump expressed support for hanging Pence during Capitol riot, Jan. 6 panel toldThe select panel has heard that, after "hang Mike Pence” chants broke out, the then-president expressed support for the prospect of hanging his No. 2, three people told POLITICO.


https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/2 ... 6-00035117


For those incapable of discerning "support for political violence" with "disdain for assholes"

 

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 12:07 pm

Trump expressed support for hanging Pence during Capitol riot, Jan. 6 panel toldThe select panel has heard that, after "hang Mike Pence” chants broke out, the then-president expressed support for the prospect of hanging his No. 2, three people told POLITICO.


https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/2 ... 6-00035117


For those incapable of discerning "support for political violence" with "disdain for assholes"

 

 

Keep lying.  Since you brought up, here is the record:

Huey » 12 Sep 2025, 1:00 pm » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 1:00 pm

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 6:28 am » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 6:28 am

RebelGator » 12 Sep 2025, 6:19 am » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 6:19 am

Saving this post as a testament to your support of political assassination.

CNN and CNBC have puked the opinion that Americans have to tone down the violent rhetoric......as they continue to call Trump, Hitler.

You are a liar, a fraud  and a minion of evil.

I'm all for assholes taking each other out.


 

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 6:17 am » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 6:17 am

JohnnyYou » 12 Sep 2025, 12:45 am » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 12:45 am

Charlie said anyone who called Trump Hitler fueled hate.

It is laughable JD Vance is number one on that list.  

Thank you for keeping the IQ average around here.  If it wasn't for some of us the collective average IQ would be negative, or even worse, an imaginary number.

The square root of the negative one resonates with me a lot lately.

Baked Time Off..  Narcissisist's Anthem:

youtu.be/N4_0Pt3HAR8?si=hRXkkPQD1JWhA3A7

It's the price of Freedumb.

Kirk would gladly have told you.

It isn't just paid with the lives of school children, or domestic partners.



Occasionally it will take out a MAGAt.


 


 

Blackvegetable » 12 Sep 2025, 6:12 am » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 6:12 am

LowIQTrash » 12 Sep 2025, 12:04 am » wrote: ↑

12 Sep 2025, 12:04 am

https://x.com/Isaiahii1/status/1966304675810181443

Next asshole up...


 

And he does it anonymously.  

 

1.  You said "I'm all for assholes taking each other out" in a discussion of Kirk's murder and your opinion.

2.  In reference to Ban Shapiro taking about his public appearance you said "next asshole up..."

So yes, you did show support for political assassination based on what a speaker says.

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 12:07 pm

Trump expressed support for hanging Pence during Capitol riot, Jan. 6 panel toldThe select panel has heard that, after "hang Mike Pence” chants broke out, the then-president expressed support for the prospect of hanging his No. 2, three people told POLITICO.

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/05/2 ... 6-00035117

For those incapable of discerning "support for political violence" with "disdain for assholes"

From your source:

The White House chief of staff at the time, Mark Meadows, was in the dining room off the Oval Office with Trump at one point during last year’s Capitol attack, the committee has been told. Meadows then left the dining room and informed other people nearby that Trump had signaled a positive view of the prospect of hanging the vice president, the panel heard.

Meadows’ account as it was described to the committee came after some members of the mob converging on the Capitol had broken into chants of “Hang Mike Pence!” Those chants were a reaction to Pence’s decision to accept electoral votes that indicated Joe Biden had won the presidency. 

POLITICO could not independently verify the veracity of the claim regarding Meadows’ comments.


 

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am

Why is this late blowhard being eulogized as a Luminary?

He called his own death an "accetable" cost of a ""G*d given" right.

Apparently, G*d agreed.

As for his message, it was high school paper editor cosplay crap..

There are 27 Republican attorneys general in the U.S., compared to 23 Democrats. But you’d hardly know it these days. Today, all the celebrity prosecutors are Democrats. The left has an entire caste of politicians who make their careers by loudly hunting down supposed “wrongdoers,” using whatever excuses they can manufacture. A cabal of prosecutors has existed for a while. In New York, for instance, the attorney general’s office has spent years neutering the National Rifle Association with a legal offensive meant to shut it down or at least entirely disable it as a national political force — an offensive that has mostly succeeded. 

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/ho ... -the-left/

While playing Pootie's fool, Wayne LaPierre was using NRA funds to go on Brioni shopping sprees....

Charlie Kirk was just another MAGAt fabulist...

But the Democrat effort to criminalize their political enemies has reached its climax in 2023. Republicans have sat and watched as four separate indictments have come down from three separate prosecutors, all with the same purpose: imprisoning Donald Trump and as many of his political allies as they can get away with. Monday’s indictment out of Fulton County, Georgia, is the most extreme yet, seeking to ensnare not just Trump but 18 of his associates for the “crime” of contesting the 2020 election through the courts and legislative process. 
  The goal of all these indictments is simple: rig the 2024 election in the court system before a single ballot can even be cast, and criminalize the MAGA political movement Trump has built. 

Ibid.


 

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

 
 

One might think that at some point during this period of national mourning a local MAGAt would quote something illustrating the value of what we have lost...

Blackvegetable » 16 Sep 2025, 8:47 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2025, 8:47 am

One might think that at some point during this period of national mourning a local MAGAt would quote something illustrating the value of what we have lost...

Godless people will never get it, they aren't in the club.
 

Fuelman » 16 Sep 2025, 9:13 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2025, 9:13 am

Godless people will never get it, they aren't in the club.

don't you mean "the cult"?
 

Blackvegetable » 16 Sep 2025, 9:19 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2025, 9:19 am

don't you mean "the cult"?

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

 
 

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am

Why is this late blowhard being eulogized as a Luminary?

He called his own death an "accetable" cost of a ""G*d given" right.

Apparently, G*d agreed.

As for his message, it was high school paper editor cosplay crap..

There are 27 Republican attorneys general in the U.S., compared to 23 Democrats. But you’d hardly know it these days. Today, all the celebrity prosecutors are Democrats. The left has an entire caste of politicians who make their careers by loudly hunting down supposed “wrongdoers,” using whatever excuses they can manufacture. A cabal of prosecutors has existed for a while. In New York, for instance, the attorney general’s office has spent years neutering the National Rifle Association with a legal offensive meant to shut it down or at least entirely disable it as a national political force — an offensive that has mostly succeeded. 

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/ho ... -the-left/

While playing Pootie's fool, Wayne LaPierre was using NRA funds to go on Brioni shopping sprees....

Charlie Kirk was just another MAGAt fabulist...

But the Democrat effort to criminalize their political enemies has reached its climax in 2023. Republicans have sat and watched as four separate indictments have come down from three separate prosecutors, all with the same purpose: imprisoning Donald Trump and as many of his political allies as they can get away with. Monday’s indictment out of Fulton County, Georgia, is the most extreme yet, seeking to ensnare not just Trump but 18 of his associates for the “crime” of contesting the 2020 election through the courts and legislative process. 
  The goal of all these indictments is simple: rig the 2024 election in the court system before a single ballot can even be cast, and criminalize the MAGA political movement Trump has built. 

Ibid.

Kirk was a moron.

“‘Investigate first, define the crimes later’ should be the order of the day,” Kirk declared in an editorial demanding the legal intimidation of anyone associated with the political left. “And for even the most minor of offenses, the rule should be: no charity, no goodwill, no mercy.”

  Speaking last year in support of Trump’s plan for mass deportation, Kirk warned that the incoming president would not tolerate dissent or resistance. “Playtime is over. And if a Democrat gets in our way, well, then Matt Gaetz very well might go arrest you,” he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/opin ... ation.html

"Jesus is my co-pilot, and a louche coke huffing pedo is my AG."

This kind of post explains a lot about BV's character, mental state and morality

Charlie was shot in front of his family.....his wife now has no husband and the 2 kids have no father....courtesy of you!

You are part of the evil Americans have turned your back on....

his feet are firmly planted on the low ground again

you are part of the monster that parents try to protect their children from

you are the judge and jury that sentenced that family to a hellish experience for having an opinion

You just poured any respect anyone has for you out on the floor for what reason?...it's gone and you can't get it back in the bottle

Hatred.....that is what you are made of...hatred for America, americans, and that wife and two little kids who saw their word blown apart by you!

You are an embarrassment to your ancestors...congrats dickhead!!

As a human being it's debatable if you barely qualify or not

nefarious101 » 16 Sep 2025, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2025, 9:30 am

This kind of post explains a lot about BV's character, mental state and morality

Charlie was shot in front of his family.....his wife now has no husband and the 2 kids have no father....courtesy of you!

You are part of the evil Americans have turned your back on....

his feet are firmly planted on the low ground again

you are part of the monster that parents try to protect their children from

you are the judge and jury that sentenced that family to a hellish experience for having an opinion

You just poured any respect anyone has for you out on the floor for what reason?...it's gone and you can't get it back in the bottle

Hatred.....that is what you are made of...hatred for America, americans, and that wife and two little kids who saw their word blown apart by you!

You are an embarrassment to your ancestors...congrats dickhead!!

As a human being it's debatable if you barely qualify or not

**** you and your Hysteria.

If you stand up and insist that several thousand deaths each year are an acceptable price to pay for a "right", "granted by G*d", you are begging karma to make an example of you.


 

Blackvegetable » 16 Sep 2025, 9:56 am » wrote: ↑

16 Sep 2025, 9:56 am

**** you and your Hysteria.

If you stand up and insist that several thousand deaths each year are an acceptable price to pay for a "right", "granted by G*d", you are begging karma to make an example of you.

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.