Liberal Forum

RebelGator » 19 Oct 2025, 8:05 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 8:05 am

*** material, written by a ***......read by a ***.

You Dad must be so proud.

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am

Why is this late blowhard being eulogized as a Luminary?

He called his own death an "accetable" cost of a ""G*d given" right.

Apparently, G*d agreed.

As for his message, it was high school paper editor cosplay crap..

There are 27 Republican attorneys general in the U.S., compared to 23 Democrats. But you’d hardly know it these days. Today, all the celebrity prosecutors are Democrats. The left has an entire caste of politicians who make their careers by loudly hunting down supposed “wrongdoers,” using whatever excuses they can manufacture. A cabal of prosecutors has existed for a while. In New York, for instance, the attorney general’s office has spent years neutering the National Rifle Association with a legal offensive meant to shut it down or at least entirely disable it as a national political force — an offensive that has mostly succeeded. 

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/ho ... -the-left/

While playing Pootie's fool, Wayne LaPierre was using NRA funds to go on Brioni shopping sprees....

Charlie Kirk was just another MAGAt fabulist...

But the Democrat effort to criminalize their political enemies has reached its climax in 2023. Republicans have sat and watched as four separate indictments have come down from three separate prosecutors, all with the same purpose: imprisoning Donald Trump and as many of his political allies as they can get away with. Monday’s indictment out of Fulton County, Georgia, is the most extreme yet, seeking to ensnare not just Trump but 18 of his associates for the “crime” of contesting the 2020 election through the courts and legislative process. 
  The goal of all these indictments is simple: rig the 2024 election in the court system before a single ballot can even be cast, and criminalize the MAGA political movement Trump has built. 

Ibid.

Kirk was a moron.

“‘Investigate first, define the crimes later’ should be the order of the day,” Kirk declared in an editorial demanding the legal intimidation of anyone associated with the political left. “And for even the most minor of offenses, the rule should be: no charity, no goodwill, no mercy.”

  Speaking last year in support of Trump’s plan for mass deportation, Kirk warned that the incoming president would not tolerate dissent or resistance. “Playtime is over. And if a Democrat gets in our way, well, then Matt Gaetz very well might go arrest you,” he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/opin ... ation.html

"Jesus is my co-pilot, and a louche coke huffing pedo is my AG."

Blackvegetable » 19 Oct 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 9:09 am

Just another black man better than you.

Blackvegetable » 19 Oct 2025, 8:51 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 8:51 am

That's why I posted the relevant bit..

**** idiot.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am » wrote: ↑

15 Sep 2025, 10:16 am

Why is this late blowhard being eulogized as a Luminary?

He called his own death an "accetable" cost of a ""G*d given" right.

Apparently, G*d agreed.

As for his message, it was high school paper editor cosplay crap..

There are 27 Republican attorneys general in the U.S., compared to 23 Democrats. But you’d hardly know it these days. Today, all the celebrity prosecutors are Democrats. The left has an entire caste of politicians who make their careers by loudly hunting down supposed “wrongdoers,” using whatever excuses they can manufacture. A cabal of prosecutors has existed for a while. In New York, for instance, the attorney general’s office has spent years neutering the National Rifle Association with a legal offensive meant to shut it down or at least entirely disable it as a national political force — an offensive that has mostly succeeded. 

https://thefederalist.com/2023/08/15/ho ... -the-left/

While playing Pootie's fool, Wayne LaPierre was using NRA funds to go on Brioni shopping sprees....

Charlie Kirk was just another MAGAt fabulist...


“‘Investigate first, define the crimes later’ should be the order of the day,” Kirk declared in an editorial demanding the legal intimidation of anyone associated with the political left. “And for even the most minor of offenses, the rule should be: no charity, no goodwill, no mercy.”

  Speaking last year in support of Trump’s plan for mass deportation, Kirk warned that the incoming president would not tolerate dissent or resistance. “Playtime is over. And if a Democrat gets in our way, well, then Matt Gaetz very well might go arrest you,” he said.

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/09/13/opin ... ation.html

"Jesus is my co-pilot, and a louche coke huffing pedo is my AG."

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 19 Oct 2025, 9:09 am » wrote: ↑

19 Oct 2025, 9:09 am

Just another black man better than you.