Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 6 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

6 minutes ago

But Vegas continues to spam...

Apparently it is only "stalking" if occasionally forwarded to a snowflake.

But let’s not fail to recognize who the REAL victims are here.

@Deezer Shoove  

and

@Cannonpointer

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 8:12 am

But Vegas continues to spam...

Apparently it is only "stalking" if occasionally forwarded to a snowflake.

But let’s not fail to recognize who the REAL victims are here.

 

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 17 Sep 2025, 8:59 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 8:59 am

     

It's not spam *******.

Blackvegetable » 2 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

2 minutes ago

Here's your chance..

Explain why you believe it isn't spam.

Blackvegetable » 57 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

57 minutes ago

But Vegas continues to spam...

Apparently it is only "stalking" if occasionally forwarded to a snowflake.

 

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:12 am

But Vegas continues to spam...

Apparently it is only "stalking" if occasionally forwarded to a snowflake.

But let’s not fail to recognize who the REAL victims are here.

Deezer Shoove  

and

Cannonpointer


 

Huey » 17 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

17 minutes ago

Need a tissue?

Blackvegetable » Today, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 9:01 am

Here's your chance..

Explain why you believe it isn't spam.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegetable » Today, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 8:12 am

But Vegas continues to spam...

Apparently it is only "stalking" if occasionally forwarded to a snowflake.

But let’s not fail to recognize who the REAL victims are here.

@Deezer Shoove  

and

@Cannonpointer

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with?

ROG62 » 17 Sep 2025, 10:19 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 10:19 am

Blackvegetable » Today, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

Today, 10:24 am

I think you should whisper that in Coozie's ear..

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Huey » 8 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

8 minutes ago

And yet another call out/tribute thread from Dum Dum using PG.

Vegas » 17 Sep 2025, 11:26 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 11:26 am

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Blackvegetable » 22 minutes ago » wrote: ↑

22 minutes ago

That too.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.