Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 8:12 am

But Vegas continues to spam...

Apparently it is only "stalking" if occasionally forwarded to a snowflake.

But let’s not fail to recognize who the REAL victims are here.

@Deezer Shoove  

and

@Cannonpointer

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 17 Sep 2025, 8:17 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 8:17 am

You won't make it in jail. Stiches...But, but, but,,,Vegas   

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 17 Sep 2025, 8:45 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 8:45 am

@Vegas  you live in his head...

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 9:01 am

Here's your chance..

Explain why you believe it isn't spam.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 8:12 am

But Vegas continues to spam...

Apparently it is only "stalking" if occasionally forwarded to a snowflake.

 

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 8:12 am

But Vegas continues to spam...

Apparently it is only "stalking" if occasionally forwarded to a snowflake.

But let’s not fail to recognize who the REAL victims are here.

Deezer Shoove  

and

Cannonpointer


 

Huey » 17 Sep 2025, 9:27 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 9:27 am

Need a tissue?

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2025, 9:01 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 9:01 am

Here's your chance..

Explain why you believe it isn't spam.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2025, 8:12 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 8:12 am

But Vegas continues to spam...

Apparently it is only "stalking" if occasionally forwarded to a snowflake.

But let’s not fail to recognize who the REAL victims are here.

@Deezer Shoove  

and

@Cannonpointer

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2025, 10:24 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 10:24 am

I think you should whisper that in Coozie's ear..

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Huey » 17 Sep 2025, 11:47 am » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 11:47 am

And yet another call out/tribute thread from Dum Dum using PG.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 12:14 pm

That too.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 17 Sep 2025, 12:14 pm » wrote: ↑

17 Sep 2025, 12:14 pm

That too.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...