My bad....by the title I thought this was an autobiography. But no...just another TDS rant.
If you were smart, (you are not), you would hammer Trump for not realizing ABC, NBC and CBS did not hold broadcasting license as a network.Blackvegetable » 19 Sep 2025, 7:53 am » wrote: ↑ Did anyone notice the subtle re-direct?
The pretext of "insufficient grief at Kirk's death" is stripped away..
It is what it always has been....Grifty demands unwavaring reverence for his Stupid. Contradicting him is blasphemy.
Criticism and lying are two different things, not surprised you don't know the difference.
brown, you can't use "snowflake" in this setting...it's a proprietary term used exclusively for libtardos...it's only to be used in light of the idiots who have "comfort dogs" and use "cry closets"...capische?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom HA!!
I'm sure it's just everyone interpreting "2xWorse than Buchanan" as an insult...ConservativeWave » 19 Sep 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑ HA!!
FOR YEARS... it was the main stream "FAKE NEWS" Media (ALL of them... MSNBC, CNN, ABC, CBS)... ALL AGAINST Conservatives, and it was ONLY Fox News that provided the REAL, TRUTHFUL News... TODAY, the American people have figured it out... the "DEMOCRATS" and the "FAKE NEWS Media" are LIARS, and the "FAKE News" media VIEWERSHIP has "FALLEN OFF A CLIFF" as a result !
So, to put Trumps words a little more ACCURATELY and REALISTICALLY... I would say... REVOKE the Licenses of ANY Networks who regularly LIE to America... and MAKE "Honesty in the Media" a REAL ISSUE again... AND, make some Federal agency RESPONSIBLE (under penalty of termination and JAIL TIME)... for NOT Honestly and Accurately ASSURING that it is DONE !
The OLD methods of controlling an OUT OF CONTROL MEDIA... are NO LONGER adequate, and the Fake News Media has gotten TOO BRAZEN (maybe due to "big money left wing" PAY-OFFS)... SO, it needs to be controlled... for the Democracy, and for the PEOPLE who NEED to know the TRUTH... in order to BE "We the PEOPLE" !!
BECAUSE it doesn't matter what CRAZY Left Wing IDIOTS think..
AMERICA DOES NOT like to be LIED TO !!
Happy now, Snowflake?ROG62 » 19 Sep 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑ brown, you can't use "snowflake" in this setting...it's a proprietary term used exclusively for libtardos...it's only to be used in light of the idiots who have "comfort dogs" and use "cry closets"...capische?
Blackvegetable » 19 Sep 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑Happy now, Snowflake?ROG62 » 19 Sep 2025, 7:59 am » wrote: ↑ brown, you can't use "snowflake" in this setting...it's a proprietary term used exclusively for libtardos...it's only to be used in light of the idiots who have "comfort dogs" and use "cry closets"...capische?

If anyone needs a translation of Veghead's title, it says this:
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
nefarious101 » 19 Sep 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑ TDS Strikes Again
over a decade of suffering with no cure in sight
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Vegas » 19 Sep 2025, 10:59 am » wrote: ↑ Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
you are making a "survivorship bias" fallacy. And **** you if you think I am going to define that for you.
Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Yeah, that makes a lot of **** sense...read much?
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom