Here is his quote...verbatim:
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
That question has been answered..Vegas » 24 Sep 2025, 10:05 am » wrote: ↑ Here is his quote...verbatim:
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
1. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah...
2. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Give us your top ten in context.
This is where you support the shooting:Blackvegetable » 24 Sep 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ Help yourself
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=97946
Is "will" future tense or past/present?
Blackvegetable » Yesterday, 4:13 pm » wrote: ↑
Yesterday, 4:13 pm
I will answer that question if you will answer one of mine...
Nazi Rally Inspires Millions To Forgive And Love Their EnemiesBlackvegetable » 24 Sep 2025, 10:28 am » wrote: ↑ Help yourself
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=97946
Was my comment in response to a question?
Narcissist amnesia kicking in. I already answered that. It was in response to Buck asking you to answer my question. You said you "will" answer it once he answers yours.
Sounds better than the repetitive multiple choice question..Vegas » 24 Sep 2025, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ Narcissist amnesia kicking in. I already answered that. It was in response to Buck asking you to answer my question. You said you "will" answer it once he answers yours.
Proof you never answered it.
1. You will continue to with your narcissist amnesia...here comes the video again.
I love enlightening my opponents.. And sometimes vice versa..Blackvegetable » 24 Sep 2025, 11:34 am » wrote: ↑ Are any of you lachrymose whining cocksuckers gonna put up a fight?
It's only repetitive because his evasions are repetitive.JohnnyYou » 24 Sep 2025, 12:07 pm » wrote: ↑ Sounds better than the repetitive multiple choice question..
You both love tge circle jerk arguments.
No one is forcing you to partake in it. Just scroll past it.JohnnyYou » 24 Sep 2025, 12:11 pm » wrote: ↑ You both love tge circle jerk arguments.
We got more important things to discuss.
Civil Rights Act was a mistake?
Post Bucks question, verbatim.Vegas » 24 Sep 2025, 11:57 am » wrote: ↑ Narcissist amnesia kicking in. I already answered that. It was in response to Buck asking you to answer my question. You said you "will" answer it once he answers yours.
Proof you never answered it.
1. You will continue to with your narcissist amnesia...here comes the video again.
Buck's is post 2, and yours is post 4. Eat it bitch.