Liberal Forum

They didn't cave, they didn't listen to their viewers, (there weren't that many anyway.  The contracts with ABC are why.  They can only cancel network shows under very narrow guidelines.  

So now, after Kimmel get's his temporary ratings bump he is on his own.  He won't be able to blame the FCC or Trump.  

Much of the bump was from those who don't watch Kimmel who tuned in just to see what he was gonna say.  I made it less than 5 minutes when he started the sniffle and sobs and was playing the victim.

**** that guy.  

Huey » 27 Sep 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 12:49 pm

They didn't cave, they didn't listen to their viewers, (there weren't that many anyway.  The contracts with ABC are why.  They can only cancel network shows under very narrow guidelines.  

So now, after Kimmel get's his temporary ratings bump he is on his own.  He won't be able to blame the FCC or Trump.  

Much of the bump was from those who don't watch Kimmel who tuned in just to see what he was gonna say.  I made it less than 5 minutes when he started the sniffle and sobs and was playing the victim.

**** that guy.

I didn't listen to him at all/ I never do. He is your typical lefty...always the victim. Always. 

Vegas » 27 Sep 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 1:04 pm

Huey » 27 Sep 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 12:49 pm

They didn't cave, they didn't listen to their viewers, (there weren't that many anyway.  The contracts with ABC are why.  They can only cancel network shows under very narrow guidelines.  

So now, after Kimmel get's his temporary ratings bump he is on his own.  He won't be able to blame the FCC or Trump.  

Much of the bump was from those who don't watch Kimmel who tuned in just to see what he was gonna say.  I made it less than 5 minutes when he started the sniffle and sobs and was playing the victim.

**** that guy.

I didn't listen to him at all/ I never do. He is your typical lefty...always the victim. Always. 

 

I don't watch him either.  I was like millions of others who were interested in what he was going to say.  It went as expected.

Huey » 27 Sep 2025, 1:06 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 1:06 pm

I don't watch him either.  I was like millions of others who were interested in what he was going to say.  It went as expected.

ya, the ****** patsy couldn't directly apologize...if the crowd had any balls, they'd of booed him offstage...
 

ROG62 » 27 Sep 2025, 4:44 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 4:44 pm

ya, the ****** patsy couldn't directly apologize...if the crowd had any balls, they'd of booed him offstage...

His audiences is like BV.  A bunch of progressive pussies doing as they are told.

Huey » 27 Sep 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 12:49 pm

They didn't cave, they didn't listen to their viewers, (there weren't that many anyway.  The contracts with ABC are why.  They can only cancel network shows under very narrow guidelines.  

So now, after Kimmel get's his temporary ratings bump he is on his own.  He won't be able to blame the FCC or Trump.  

Much of the bump was from those who don't watch Kimmel who tuned in just to see what he was gonna say.  I made it less than 5 minutes when he started the sniffle and sobs and was playing the victim.

**** that guy.

His numbers are strong still

tRump **** up

most didn’t pay any attention to Kimmel 

They do now .. at least his monologue 

we will see
 

Mrkelly » 27 Sep 2025, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 7:06 pm

His numbers are strong still

tRump **** up

most didn’t pay any attention to Kimmel 

They do now .. at least his monologue 

we will see

Dum dum, he lost almost a million **** viewers since **** January.  

In January he had only 1.9 million viewers.  In August he had 1.1 million viewers.

as usual you have no **** clue what the **** you are talking about.

prove me wrong, ****, with facts, Dum Dum
 

Mrkelly » 27 Sep 2025, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 7:06 pm

His numbers are strong still

tRump **** up

most didn’t pay any attention to Kimmel 

They do now .. at least his monologue 

we will see

Lying leftist ****.

Huey » 27 Sep 2025, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 8:46 pm

Dum dum, he lost almost a million **** viewers since **** January.  

In January he had only 1.9 million viewers.  In August he had 1.1 million viewers.

as usual you have no **** clue what the **** you are talking about.

prove me wrong, ****, with facts, Dum Dum

he was on summer vacation you dolt

Huey » 27 Sep 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 12:49 pm

They didn't cave, they didn't listen to their viewers, (there weren't that many anyway.  The contracts with ABC are why.  They can only cancel network shows under very narrow guidelines.  

So now, after Kimmel get's his temporary ratings bump he is on his own.  He won't be able to blame the FCC or Trump.  

Much of the bump was from those who don't watch Kimmel who tuned in just to see what he was gonna say.  I made it less than 5 minutes when he started the sniffle and sobs and was playing the victim.

**** that guy.

Yep...Kimmel is a fake.

roadkill » 27 Sep 2025, 10:27 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 10:27 pm

Yep...Kimmel is a fake.

AI Generated?  Is that even fake nowadays?

KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! KIMMEL! 
 

murdock » 27 Sep 2025, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 8:54 pm

Lying leftist ****.

Your ratings have dropped lower than the crap on your face as fast as you drop your partners  pants to give him  a jelly roll

And that's the way it was..  Walter ChronTits...
 

Mrkelly » 27 Sep 2025, 7:06 pm » wrote: ↑

27 Sep 2025, 7:06 pm

His numbers are strong still

Relative to what? The Home Shopping Network?

Leno's final episode - which occurred in the same media space as we have today, so it's not like I'm comparing to a time when there were three channels and no internet - had 14.6 million people watching. We have 25 million more people today than in 2014 when Leno's last episode aired. And how many watched kimmel, even in the face of all this drama; even in the face of people who despise him tuning in out of curiosity, even in the face of millions of FIRST TIME VIEWERS tuning in?

An anemic 6.3 million viewers. That's it. That's all. Less than half of the people who tuned in for Leno's final episode, with 25 million less potentialviewers in the country. Kimmel's numbers are strong compared to WHAT? 

Leno's TYPICAL viewership was 5 to 6 million viewers. 
Kimmel's is 1.6 to1.8 million. 
The post menopausal hacks on the view regularly do a touch over a million more than kimmel. 

When you say that his numbers are "still strong," what are you comparing them to? Certainly not to any of the various Ken Burns documentaries out there. 

I gotta say, when you have less than 1/2 of 1% of Americans tuning in, you don't have strong ratings. Sorry. Ya just **** don't. When the hags on the view are eating your **** lunch, you're a niche market. You're holding a space the netowrk doesn't know WTF else to do with. 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T6xJzAYYrX8&t=21s
 

Cannonpointer » 28 Sep 2025, 12:52 am » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2025, 12:52 am

Relative to what? The Home Shopping Network?

Leno's final episode - which occurred in the same media space as we have today, so it's not like I'm comparing to a time when there were three channels and no internet - had 14.6 million people watching. We have 25 million more people today than in 2014 when Leno's last episode aired. And how many watched kimmel, even in the face of all this drama; even in the face of people who despise him tuning in out of curiosity, even in the face of millions of FIRST TIME VIEWERS tuning in?

An anemic 6.3 million viewers. That's it. That's all. Less than half of the people who tuned in for Leno's final episode, with 25 million less potentialviewers in the country. Kimmel's numbers are strong compared to WHAT? 

Leno's TYPICAL viewership was 5 to 6 million viewers. 
Kimmel's is 1.6 to1.8 million. 
The post menopausal hacks on the view regularly do a touch over a million more than kimmel. 

When you say that his numbers are "still strong," what are you comparing them to? Certainly not to any of the various Ken Burns documentaries out there. 

I gotta say, when you have less than 1/2 of 1% of Americans tuning in, you don't have strong ratings. Sorry. Ya just **** don't. When the hags on the view are eating your **** lunch, you're a niche market. You're holding a space the netowrk doesn't know WTF else to do with. 

youtube /watch?v=T6xJzAYYrX8&t=21s

How are the MAGA hat sales?  Did you ask Santa for a new pair of Golden Sneakers and a shyt brown bible?

Every kid could get at least one doll this year if their parents didn't squander their financial resources on Trump's grift.

Merry Phooking Griftmas.

Trump PLAN BACKFIRES as Kimmel BRINGS OUT THE BIG GUNS
youtu.be/yjCti1WWEw8?si=D5Xgaf0O9tIVWUOX

 
Kimmels return monologue is at 26 Million views.  That does include Furrieners.

JohnnyYou » 28 Sep 2025, 1:25 am » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2025, 1:25 am

Kimmels return monologue is at 26 Million views.  That does include Furrieners.

Those views aren't monetized, jaggov.

When you count rubber-necking as success, you prove that you're a retard. 
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 28 Sep 2025, 1:43 am » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2025, 1:43 am

Those views aren't monetized, jaggov.

When you count rubbernecking as success, you prove that you're a retard.

If it doesn't fit your agenda it has to be false.

Thank you for at least having the courage to engage in dialog. @roadkill  runs from me like I am the anti christ and he always chickens out..   RACO's for all!

White Punks on Dope with Guns commit 75% of all mass shootings.
 

JohnnyYou » 28 Sep 2025, 1:49 am » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2025, 1:49 am

If it doesn't fit your agenda it has to be false.

Never said it was false, you fruit. I said that counting rubber-necking as views is well suited to you - it being queer-work and all.

And it isn't courage one must have to "dialogue" with you. It's tolerance for chick brained utterances and non sequiturs and deliberate dishonesty.
 

Cannonpointer » 28 Sep 2025, 1:53 am » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2025, 1:53 am

Never said it was false, you fruit. I said that counting rubber-necking as views is well suited to you - it being queer-work and all.

And it isn't courage one must have to "dialogue" with you. It's tolerance for chick brained utterances and non sequiturs and deliberate dishonesty.

Your propganda has nothing to stand on.   Damnitol is 47 times more effective than Tylenol or Ivermectin taken together.

JohnnyYou » 28 Sep 2025, 1:58 am » wrote: ↑

28 Sep 2025, 1:58 am

Your propganda has nothing to stand on.   Damnitol is 47 times more effective than Tylenol or Ivermectin taken together.

Johnny you ***, spewing **** 24/7 one post at a time. How much orange meat will you gorge on today?