Will it go round in circles?murdock » 28 Sep 2025, 5:27 am » wrote: ↑ Johnny you ***, spewing **** 24/7 one post at a time. How much orange meat will you gorge on today?
Victim of circumstantial circumstances created by social manipulation of time ,management living when only alive adapting in space ancestrally here, on at a time, now.Vegas » 27 Sep 2025, 1:04 pm » wrote: ↑ I didn't listen to him at all/ I never do. He is your typical lefty...always the victim. Always.
You and your boy johnny YN married yet? **** puking babbling idiot.*31stArrival » 28 Sep 2025, 7:34 am » wrote: ↑ Victim of circumstantial circumstances created by social manipulation of time ,management living when only alive adapting in space ancestrally here, on at a time, now.
Specific gravity as displaced evolving since arrived a fertilize cell. Pay attention to Thermodynamic Principles between periodic elements eroding and ancestral chromosomes decomposing in ancestral lineages here so far one generation gap at a time never same reproductions twice changing form since shaped when conceived to replace previous 5 generations of current lifetimes inhabiting space today.
You obviously don't read the differences between the two are not compatible in social engagements while having a civil conversation on this internet web site open to the whole population in this atmosphere.murdock » 28 Sep 2025, 7:36 am » wrote: ↑ You and your boy johnny YN married yet? **** puking babbling idiot.
I replied to you talking about the tRump bump going awayHuey » 27 Sep 2025, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Dum dum, he lost almost a million **** viewers since **** January.
In January he had only 1.9 million viewers. In August he had 1.1 million viewers.
as usual you have no **** clue what the **** you are talking about.
prove me wrong, ****, with facts, Dum Dum
jerra » wrote:Huey » 27 Sep 2025, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Dum dum, he lost almost a million **** viewers since **** January.
In January he had only 1.9 million viewers. In August he had 1.1 million viewers.
as usual you have no **** clue what the **** you are talking about.
prove me wrong, ****, with facts, Dum Dum
he was on summer vacation you dolt
Mrkelly » 28 Sep 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑I replied to you talking about the tRump bump going awayHuey » 27 Sep 2025, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Dum dum, he lost almost a million **** viewers since **** January.
In January he had only 1.9 million viewers. In August he had 1.1 million viewers.
as usual you have no **** clue what the **** you are talking about.
prove me wrong, ****, with facts, Dum Dum
couldn’t care less about his ratings in January
All of this has given kimmel a major boom on YouTubeHuey » 28 Sep 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ His number were not strong prior to his suspension. Much of his bump was people like me who were interested to see what the **** was going to say on his return.
This is not about Trump. I have already brought up the point, a couple of times, that the bump is from his monologue. Next, Trump and the FCC are out of the picture. As they were for the first part of the year as that show bled viewers. Kimmel is back on his own. His success or failure will be HIS responsibility. He won't be able to play victim any longer.Mrkelly » 28 Sep 2025, 11:07 am » wrote: ↑All of this has given kimmel a major boom on YouTubeHuey » 28 Sep 2025, 10:06 am » wrote: ↑ His number were not strong prior to his suspension. Much of his bump was people like me who were interested to see what the **** was going to say on his return.
mostly for his monologue I would think
cant be the content of the show
it had 20 million views on Thursday… his third night back
A lot of people don’t like tRump, and didn’t realize how hard kimmel went after him
and how much it bothers tRump
they do now
we will see
And I am sure that is how tRump will paint the pictureHuey » 28 Sep 2025, 11:19 am » wrote: ↑ This is not about Trump. I have already brought up the point, a couple of times, that the bump is from his monologue. Next, Trump and the FCC are out of the picture. As they were for the first part of the year as that show bled viewers. Kimmel is back on his own. His success or failure will be HIS responsibility. He won't be able to play victim any longer.
Rotating around a talking point without getting to the core is always talking in circles, jerk. Especially when discussing evolution theories rather than actual time evolving one of a kind here now.Johnny You » 28 Sep 2025, 5:45 am » wrote: ↑ Will it go round in circles?
Will you stop circle jerkin'?
You ain't got no song man.. Your melody is obnoxiously evil.
jerra » wrote:Huey » 27 Sep 2025, 8:46 pm » wrote: ↑ Dum dum, he lost almost a million **** viewers since **** January.
In January he had only 1.9 million viewers. In August he had 1.1 million viewers.
as usual you have no **** clue what the **** you are talking about.
prove me wrong, ****, with facts, Dum Dum
he was on summer vacation you dolt
He never had viewers.Huey » 30 Sep 2025, 11:03 am » wrote: ↑ As predicted:
Jimmy Kimmel’s short-lived ratings spike comes to screeching halt
https://nypost.com/2025/09/29/media/jim ... uspension/
It was a short-lived backfire.Mrkelly » 28 Sep 2025, 11:38 am » wrote: ↑ And I am sure that is how tRump will paint the picture
And kimmel will always blame the “tRump bump” for the boost
“We can do this the easy way, or the hard way “ backfired bigly
His youtube presence isn't monetized.
He make a couple million a year from YouTubeCannonpointer » 30 Sep 2025, 11:17 am » wrote: ↑ His youtube presence isn't monetized.
And gawkers don't count.
Huey » 27 Sep 2025, 12:49 pm » wrote: ↑ They didn't cave, they didn't listen to their viewers, (there weren't that many anyway. The contracts with ABC are why. They can only cancel network shows under very narrow guidelines.
So now, after Kimmel get's his temporary ratings bump he is on his own. He won't be able to blame the FCC or Trump.
Much of the bump was from those who don't watch Kimmel who tuned in just to see what he was gonna say. I made it less than 5 minutes when he started the sniffle and sobs and was playing the victim.
**** that guy.
Which is equal to the number of ingredients in an Epstein Cocktail
Kimmel's ratings are on a Space X Heavy Lift.Mrkelly » 28 Sep 2025, 8:43 am » wrote: ↑ I replied to you talking about the tRump bump going away
couldn’t care less about his ratings in January