He'snot a troll. He's a whore.Mrkelly » 30 Sep 2025, 2:10 pm » wrote: ↑ He make a couple million a year from YouTube
drop in the bucket for him I’m sure
It means a lot more to him that more people get to watch him troll tRump
trolls be like that
STFU Dum Dum.
----------------------------------Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 4:54 am » wrote: ↑ STFU Dum Dum.
On Thursday, Oct. 2, "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" averaged 1.9 million viewers, shedding 71% of the audience that tuned in for the host’s return from suspension.
The decline among the advertiser-coveted demographic of adults aged 25-54 was even more significant, as "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" managed 265,000 viewers from the critical group on Thursday night to lose 85% of the 1.7 million who tuned in on Sept. 23. It marked Kimmel’s smallest audience among demo viewers since the suspension.
Kimmel averaged 1.6 million viewers in 2025 before Disney decided to temporarily sideline him, so another drop would result in the show returning to its pre-scandal viewership.
ABC’s "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" also trailed Fox News’ "Gutfeld!" across the board on Thursday.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/jimmy-kim ... eback-show
Told ya so, *******.
jerrab » 08 Oct 2025, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ ----------------------------------
Stephen Colbert of The Late Show and Greg Gutfeld of Gutfeld! are the highest-rated late-night hosts, with Colbert leading in total viewers in the 11:35 PM slot and Gutfeld topping cable news ratings. Jimmy Kimmel's Live! also performs strongly, leading the 18-49 demographic in its timeslot, while Jimmy Fallon's The Tonight Show is the most-followed and engaged late-night show on social media.
Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ I suggest you read the citation again. Particularly this part:
The decline among the advertiser-coveted demographic of adults aged 25-54 was even more significant, as "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" managed 265,000 viewers from the critical group on Thursday night to lose 85% of the 1.7 million who tuned in on Sept. 23. It marked Kimmel’s smallest audience among demo viewers since the su
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Approval rating=15px: A YouGov poll conducted in early October 2025 showed that Kimmel had a +3 net favorability rating (44% favorable to 41% unfavorable). This put him 16 points ahead of Donald Trump, who had a -13 net favorability rating at the time.
Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 12:30 pm » wrote: ↑ I suggest you read the citation again. Particularly this part:
The decline among the advertiser-coveted demographic of adults aged 25-54 was even more significant, as "Jimmy Kimmel Live!" managed 265,000 viewers from the critical group on Thursday night to lose 85% of the 1.7 million who tuned in on Sept. 23. It marked Kimmel’s smallest audience among demo viewers since the suspension.
jerrab » 08 Oct 2025, 1:15 pm » wrote: ↑-------------------------------------------------------------
- Polarized audience: Data from the controversy reveals a clear partisan divide. While Democrats overwhelmingly disapproved of Kimmel's suspension and were happy about his return, Republicans were more likely to approve of the suspension and oppose his return.
- "Too political" perception: The same poll showed that while many Americans view Kimmel as liberal (57%), a larger group (40%) felt his approach to politics was "about right" rather than "too political" (35%).
much to trump's chagrin, kimmel is poptular. last night the focus was on the epstein files. I would encourage everyone to watch the monologue of 10/7.
Don't really care. I came here to discuss Kimmel's ratings decline.
Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't really care. I came here to discuss Kimmel's ratings decline.
Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑ I don't really care. He ratings are back to pre suspension levels when you blamed his vacation. As you were told would happen.
Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑ Don't really care. I came here to discuss Kimmel's ratings decline.
Umm, wrong week,****. I psoted from the week of 22 Oct. Nice attemp to reframe.jerrab » 08 Oct 2025, 2:40 pm » wrote: ↑ but not fox's
haha
==================================
According to Nielsen big data + panel for the week of September 22, Fox News averaged 2.454 million total viewers and 249,000 A25-54 viewers during primetime. The network was down -8% in total viewers and down -14% in the demo compared to the week prior (the week beginning September 15). Fox News averaged 1.524 million total viewers and 156,000 A25-54 viewers in total day viewing. Based on its average in those measurements from the previous week, it was down by -14% in total viewers and -22% in the demo.Fox News slipped to second place in total primetime viewers and was the No. 2 network in the demo among all basic cable networks. In total day, it remained in first place in total viewers and was in second place in the total day demo.
No sbit. Never said it did, Troll.jerrab » 08 Oct 2025, 2:37 pm » wrote: ↑ his suspension had nothing do with rarings.
he was brought back because his many fans threatened to boycott advertisors and stores.
-------------------------------------------------------------Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ No sbit. Never said it did, Troll.
He is also down since Feb, idiot.
Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ No sbit. Never said it did, Troll.
He is also down since Feb, idiot.
-------------------------------Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 3:25 pm » wrote: ↑ No sbit. Never said it did, Troll.
He is also down since Feb, idiot.
This a response to your last 3 post that are attempting to move the goal posts on the topic. You are the type is asshole PG was designed for.jerrab » 08 Oct 2025, 5:44 pm » wrote: ↑ -------------------------------
Following the blackout of Jimmy Kimmel Live! by Sinclair and Nexstar, some consumers have called for boycotts of advertisers who funded the stations' programming, with brands like Allstate, Marshalls, and AT&T specifically targeted. While Sinclair and Nexstar have since agreed to reinstate the show on their ABC affiliates, the calls for boycotts and pressure campaigns on advertisers to pull their funding from these broadcasters were significant during the conflict.
-------------------------------------------------
my idea as well.
Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑ This a response to your last 3 post that are attempting to move the goal posts on the topic. You are the type is asshole PG was designed for.
The fact of the matter is before his deserved suspension Kimmel’s ratings were down since last year by almost a million viewers.
And since his short lived bump they are returning to that level since his short lived lived return bump.
You are either a liar or an idiot if your are arguing against that.
By all means continue to show what a **** you are. Like @Blackvegetable i enjoy laughing at your ignorant ***.
Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑ This a response to your last 3 post that are attempting to move the goal posts on the topic. You are the type is asshole PG was designed for.
The fact of the matter is before his deserved suspension Kimmel’s ratings were down since last year by almost a million viewers.
And since his short lived bump they are returning to that level since his short lived lived return bump.
You are either a liar or an idiot if your are arguing against that.
By all means continue to show what a **** you are. Like @Blackvegetable i enjoy laughing at your ignorant ***.
Huey » 08 Oct 2025, 7:34 pm » wrote: ↑ This a response to your last 3 post that are attempting to move the goal posts on the topic. You are the type is asshole PG was designed for.
The fact of the matter is before his deserved suspension Kimmel’s ratings were down since last year by almost a million viewers.
And since his short lived bump they are returning to that level since his short lived lived return bump.
You are either a liar or an idiot if your are arguing against that.
By all means continue to show what a **** you are. Like @Blackvegetable i enjoy laughing at your ignorant ***.