It's interesting how Stumpy used Trump's name to replace "Democrats" in that article.Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ All but one of the respondents rated Trump’s second term as a greater or much greater threat to the rule of law than his first term. They consistently characterized the president’s abuses of power — wielding the law to justify his wishes — as being far worse than they imagined before his re-election.
And every single one of the 50 respondents believe that Trump and his attorney general, Pam Bondi, have used the Justice Department to go after the president’s political and personal enemies and provide favors to his allies.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/06/maga ... tment.html
thoughts....
How long can his butt hurt last? This is almost 10 years.roadkill » 06 Oct 2025, 2:48 pm » wrote: ↑ It's interesting how Stumpy used Trump's name to replace "Democrats" in that article.
Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ All but one of the respondents rated Trump’s second term as a greater or much greater threat to the rule of law than his first term. They consistently characterized the president’s abuses of power — wielding the law to justify his wishes — as being far worse than they imagined before his re-election.
And every single one of the 50 respondents believe that Trump and his attorney general, Pam Bondi, have used the Justice Department to go after the president’s political and personal enemies and provide favors to his allies.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/06/maga ... tment.html
thoughts....
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
The LGBT Dickhead is having another TDS meltdownBlackvegetable » 06 Oct 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ All but one of the respondents rated Trump’s second term as a greater or much greater threat to the rule of law than his first term. They consistently characterized the president’s abuses of power — wielding the law to justify his wishes — as being far worse than they imagined before his re-election.
And every single one of the 50 respondents believe that Trump and his attorney general, Pam Bondi, have used the Justice Department to go after the president’s political and personal enemies and provide favors to his allies.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/06/maga ... tment.html
thoughts....

Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ All but one of the respondents rated Trump’s second term as a greater or much greater threat to the rule of law than his first term. They consistently characterized the president’s abuses of power — wielding the law to justify his wishes — as being far worse than they imagined before his re-election.
And every single one of the 50 respondents believe that Trump and his attorney general, Pam Bondi, have used the Justice Department to go after the president’s political and personal enemies and provide favors to his allies.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/06/maga ... tment.html
thoughts....

JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom 3 more years at a minimum...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Deep, JuCo...
No doubt you need some but finding someone compatible with your type and has some extra thoughts, would be extremely rare.Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ All but one of the respondents rated Trump’s second term as a greater or much greater threat to the rule of law than his first term. They consistently characterized the president’s abuses of power — wielding the law to justify his wishes — as being far worse than they imagined before his re-election.
And every single one of the 50 respondents believe that Trump and his attorney general, Pam Bondi, have used the Justice Department to go after the president’s political and personal enemies and provide favors to his allies.
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/06/maga ... tment.html
thoughts....
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Blackvegetable » 06 Oct 2025, 2:24 pm » wrote: ↑ All but one of the respondents rated Trump’s second term as a greater or much greater threat to the rule of law than his first term. They consistently characterized the president’s abuses of power — wielding the law to justify his wishes — as being far worse than they imagined before his re-election.
And every single one of the 50 respondents believe that Trump and his attorney general, Pam Bondi, have used the Justice Department to go after the president’s political and personal enemies and provide favors to his allies.
no spam
thoughts....
Your thoughts are with Satan traitor.RebelGator » 06 Oct 2025, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑ No doubt you need some but finding someone compatible with your type and has some extra thoughts, would be extremely rare.
I think you're a cretin.RebelGator » 06 Oct 2025, 7:49 pm » wrote: ↑ No doubt you need some but finding someone compatible with your type and has some extra thoughts, would be extremely rare.
Good, I want to be as far as possible from your thinking as I can get.