*Beekeeper » 07 Oct 2025, 6:39 am » wrote: ↑ Our boy @Blackvegetable the IDIOT will be butt hurt now.
https://x.com/JasonJournoDC/status/1974 ... 7934557310
(via Daily Caller):
Schumer and Jeffries met with President Donald Trump in the Oval Office on Monday to discuss a short-term spending bill to prevent a government shutdown, but they did not reach an agreement. Halperin said during his show’s “losers of the week” segment that neither the media nor Democrats had confidence in Schumer and Jeffries.
“Never in my career have I seen two leaders so dismissed, not just by the media, which normally loves Democrats, but privately by Democratic members of the House and Senate,” Halperin said. “People are just rolling their eyes and throwing their hands up and saying, ‘There’s nothing we can do. We’re not going to depose them now, but they are not leading us’ in the view of Democrats saying that ‘they’re not leading through this confrontation.'” “I’ve never seen the senior Democrats in both chambers — or Republicans — I’ve never seen attitude like this,” he added.
To prove you're not a complete idiot?
MEDBED*Beekeeper » 07 Oct 2025, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ But I'm not, so I stick with the party of SCIENCE, LOGIC, and REASONING- aka the REPUBLICANS!!
Are YOU an American? ...the WORLD WONDERS ?
I expect maturity from the person I voted for. I am sure you agree.
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom Roshambo » 07 Oct 2025, 10:42 am » wrote: ↑ I expect maturity from the person I voted for. I am sure you agree.
Science fiction![]()
https://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=98326
A proposed 47% cut to NASA science from the Trump administration has sounded the alarm among scientists and space advocates.*Beekeeper » 07 Oct 2025, 5:43 pm » wrote: ↑ So why did you vote for KommieLA cocksucktress, who sucked more cock than any whorehouse madam to get to her position in government???
*Beekeeper » 07 Oct 2025, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ I stick with the party of SCIENCE, LOGIC, and REASONING- aka the REPUBLICANS!!
Catching piss in a weight-less environment....how many billions did that cost?Roshambo » 08 Oct 2025, 4:49 am » wrote: ↑ A proposed 47% cut to NASA science from the Trump administration has sounded the alarm among scientists and space advocates.
So much for "science"
Roshambo » 08 Oct 2025, 4:49 am » wrote: ↑ A proposed 47% cut to NASA science from the Trump administration has sounded the alarm among scientists and space advocates.
So much for "science"
Science*Beekeeper » 08 Oct 2025, 6:11 am » wrote: ↑ NASA's mission is SPACE exploration. The PROPOSED CUTS were NOT to the space exploration budget, but to OTHER "science" initiatives that had LITTLE TO NOTHING TO DO WITH SPACE you **** loser!!
So much for keeping an AGENCY ON TRACK IN THEIR PURUIT OF SCIENCE!!
MEDBED
RebelGator » 08 Oct 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑ Catching piss in a weight-less environment....how many billions did that cost?
So much for "science".
*Beekeeper » 07 Oct 2025, 7:30 am » wrote: ↑ I stick with the party of SCIENCE, LOGIC, and REASONING- aka the REPUBLICANS!!
Simple*Beekeeper » 08 Oct 2025, 7:22 am » wrote: ↑ Define what a WOMAN IS, pissforbrains!!
Since you can't even do the BASICS of science, you need to SHUT THE **** UP!!!
SCIENCE.
Your wife?*Beekeeper » 08 Oct 2025, 8:01 am » wrote: ↑ SCIENCE.
Like this??..........
https://www.salon.com/app/uploads/2013/01/rupaul.jpg