Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
Buck
Damm how sloppy they never burned them, release it all now! lol this is gonna be good
MR-7
Too funny. TRUMP has destroyed the democrat party. No reporting of this at this time from abc, or cbs, or cnn, or nbc, ect.
MR-7
"Just think about this," Patel told Rogan. "Me, as director of the FBI, the former 'Russiagate guy,' when I first got to the bureau, found a room that Comey and others hid from the world in the Hoover Building, full of documents and computer hard drives that no one had ever seen or heard of. Locked the key and hid access and just said, 'No one's ever gonna find this place.'"
MR-7
Nixon was not at this level. This is a whole other level. Nixon spied, same thing Obama did to Trump. This is a frame job for insurrection one of the few things that can keep you from being eligible to be president, Thats why they needed Jan 6 to be an insurrection.
Can I say it?Huey
Can I say it? Can I say it? THIS IS WORSE THAN WATERGATE
But that's not the Money ShotMR-7
By FAR....obama will pay for the Anti-TRUMP "COUP". I'm all for impeachment and exile
:rofl: :die: :rofl:Huey
For now I just wan a transparent investigation
Imagine confronting the world this **** stupid.BuckNaked
The fbi left incrementing evidence in the FBI?
Another level 0 response. Shocker. You can't even come up with different insults. At least try for God sakes.
Deal:Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:
1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense.
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat
2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..
3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers.
Moron.
Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why.
Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.
you do it everyday...living it is obviously enough...no imagining needed...
JuCo 5 percenter...72
“Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA
"Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom viewtopic.php?p=2777479#p2777479Vegas » 16 Oct 2025, 10:04 am » wrote: ↑ Another level 0 response. Shocker. You can't even come up with different insults. At least try for God sakes.
Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?
A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors
Predictions:
Deal:
Now THAT'S "accuracy".Blackvegetable
Of course you can say it....
You WILL run from it, but you can certainly say it.
Didn't read it. I will not entertain your stalking.Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ viewtopic.php?p=2777479#p2777479
but this one's even better..
Now THAT'S "accuracy".
Didn't read it. I will not entertain your stalking.
Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2025, 10:20 am » wrote: ↑ Didn't read it. I will not entertain your stalking.
Commit this line to memory...
Nice post Stumpy...you guys almost made it.Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2025, 9:20 am » wrote: ↑ https://www.foxnews.com/politics/patel- ... t-room-fbi
Patel found thousands of sensitive Trump–Russia probe docs inside 'burn bags' in secret room at FBI
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/14/us/p ... utors.html
Career prosecutors at the Justice Department do not believe criminal charges are warranted from an investigation seeking to discredit an earlier F.B.I. inquiry into Russia’s attempt to tilt the 2016 election in President Trump’s favor, according to people familiar with the matter....
Already, the U.S. attorney in the Western District of Virginia overseeing the case, Todd Gilbert, was forced to resign in August because he refused to sideline a high-ranking career prosecutor who found the evidence flimsy, the people familiar with the matter said.
Senior Justice Department officials had ordered Mr. Gilbert to open a grand jury investigation into whether anyone at F.B.I. headquarters during and after the Biden administration had mishandled classified documents related to the Russia investigation that Mr. Trump has long decried as a “witch hunt” against him...
Mr. Gilbert was a longtime Republican legislator in Virginia until he was sworn in as the top prosecutor in July. He was quickly ordered to take up a case championed by the F.B.I. director, Kash Patel, and his deputy, Dan Bongino, after they learned that classified documents had been found inside “burn bags” at F.B.I. headquarters.
I think it would be fun to look back on this and revel in some epic slack jaw goober....

You should read your ****.
Blackvegetable » 16 Oct 2025, 10:34 am » wrote: ↑ You should read your ****.
But I understand why you won't.
I will not entertain your stalking.
Yes...you'll be seeing them a lot...
Post something intelligent from your archives.Vegas » 16 Oct 2025, 10:54 am » wrote: ↑ Of course I will. You can only copy people. You have no intelligent thoughts of your own.
No...the point of this exercise is to determine whether you are qualified to determine what is "intelligent".