Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am

Holy ****!

The man is a yammering stool.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am

https://youtu.be/DT7Scg2okMs?si=lcWs-MOEBXjnz-l2
 

Holy ****!

The man is a yammering stool.

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am

https://youtu.be/DT7Scg2okMs?si=lcWs-MOEBXjnz-l2

Holy ****!

The man is a yammering stool.

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 7:06 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:06 am

“I mean, there’s a rumor, and I don’t know if it’s so or not, that Cuba, they don’t have Tylenol because they don’t have the money for Tylenol. And they have virtually no autism, OK. Tell me about that one,” Trump said at an event on Monday where he urged pregnant women to avoid taking Tylenol, which he claimed – despite a lack of scientific evidence – could cause autism in their unborn children.

https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/23/americas ... intl-latam

THE FUEHRER NEVER SAID "DRINK BLEACH."!

RebelGator » 18 Oct 2025, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:19 am

What did Comatose Biden and Kameltoe say......oops, never mind.

nefarious101 » 18 Oct 2025, 7:29 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:29 am

Anyone else notice how bitter BV the LGTB dickhead has become?

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:21 am

Show us....

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am

https://youtu.be/DT7Scg2okMs?si=lcWs-MOEBXjnz-l2

Holy ****!

The man is a yammering stool.

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am

https://youtu.be/DT7Scg2okMs?si=lcWs-MOEBXjnz-l2
 

Holy ****!

The man is a yammering stool.

 

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:21 am

RebelGator » 18 Oct 2025, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:19 am

What did Comatose Biden and Kameltoe say......oops, never mind.

Show us....

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:21 am

RebelGator » 18 Oct 2025, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:19 am

What did Comatose Biden and Kameltoe say......oops, never mind.

Show us....

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:21 am

RebelGator » 18 Oct 2025, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:19 am

What did Comatose Biden and Kameltoe say......oops, never mind.

Show us....

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 7:21 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:21 am

RebelGator » 18 Oct 2025, 7:19 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 7:19 am

What did Comatose Biden and Kameltoe say......oops, never mind.

Show us....

 

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 6:38 am

https://youtu.be/DT7Scg2okMs?si=lcWs-MOEBXjnz-l2

Holy ****!

The man is a yammering stool.

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Blackvegetable » 18 Oct 2025, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 6:54 am

The fruit of a moron's lolns...

Eric Trump on Tuesday claimed that President Donald Trump and the MAGA movement are “saving God” during an interview with conservative political commentator Benny Johnson. 

While touting his new book, “Under Siege,” Eric Trump insisted his father is bound for heaven after taking measures to shutter diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and repress “woke” politics.

  “We’re saving Christianity. We’ve saving God,” he told Johnson. “We’re saving the family unit. We’re saving this nation. I mean, DEI is out of the window, Benny. You no longer have Colin Kaepernick kneeling for the national anthem. You no longer have Budweiser going woke as hell. All of this is dead. We have a return to people going to church.

https://www.nj.com/politics/2025/10/tru ... g-god.html

**** rubes...

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 18 Oct 2025, 10:56 am » wrote: ↑

18 Oct 2025, 10:56 am

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Deal: