Liberal Forum

Arizona vs. Mike Johnson is not a criminal case but a pending legal dispute regarding the seating of Arizona Congresswoman-elect Adelita Grijalva
. In October 2025, Arizona's Attorney General, Kris Mayes, threatened to sue Speaker of the House Mike Johnson for failing to swear in Grijalva after she won a special election. Mayes followed through on the threat and announced plans to file a lawsuit. 
Case background
The election: Democrat Adelita Grijalva won a special election on September 23, 2025, for Arizona's 7th Congressional District, which was vacated after the death of her father, Rep. Raúl Grijalva.
The delay: Although Arizona's special election results were certified on October 14, 2025, Speaker Johnson refused to swear her in during subsequent "pro forma" sessions, which are brief meetings held while the House is in recess. Instead, Johnson insisted he would only seat her once the House returned to a full legislative session.
The government shutdown: A government shutdown in October 2025 led to an extended House recess, allowing Johnson to delay Grijalva's seating.
The Epstein petition: Grijalva was expected to be the 218th signature on a discharge petition, which would force a House floor vote on a resolution to release records related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. Many Democrats and others alleged the delay was a retaliatory measure by Johnson to prevent this vote. Johnson denied this claim.
Legal pressure: Attorney General Mayes and other Democrats condemned the delay as unconstitutional, arguing that it deprived Arizona of its full representation in Congress. 
Legal brief: State of Arizona vs. Mike Johnson
Parties
Plaintiff: State of Arizona (represented by Attorney General Kris Mayes)
Defendant: Mike Johnson (in his official capacity as Speaker of the House) 
Cause of action
Deprivation of constitutional right to full congressional representation, in violation of the U.S. Constitution. 
Factual allegations
Adelita Grijalva was duly elected to Arizona's 7th Congressional District on September 23, 2025.
The election was formally certified by the state of Arizona on October 14, 2025.
Speaker Johnson refused to seat Grijalva, departing from historical precedent of swearing in newly elected members during pro forma sessions.
This delay left Arizona without full representation in the House.
Johnson's stated reasons for the delay—the government shutdown and reliance on a "Pelosi precedent"—are disputed by the plaintiff, who notes that Johnson previously seated other members during similar sessions. 
Legal claims
Constitutional violation: The plaintiff claims that Speaker Johnson has a ministerial duty to administer the oath of office to a duly elected and certified member of Congress. By refusing to do so, he is unconstitutionally obstructing the will of the voters of Arizona's 7th District.
Declaratory judgment: The plaintiff seeks a court order declaring that Johnson must immediately swear in Congresswoman-elect Grijalva.
Mandatory injunction: The plaintiff also seeks an order compelling Speaker Johnson to seat Grijalva. 
Defendant's arguments
Political stunt: Johnson has dismissed the legal threats as a "publicity stunt" by a Democratic Attorney General.
Customary practice: He maintains that he is following "customary practice" and will seat Grijalva when the House returns to its regular legislative session.
Government shutdown: Johnson argues that the ongoing government shutdown is the reason for the House's recess and the subsequent delay.
Pelosi precedent: He has cited a historical precedent involving former Speaker Nancy Pelosi to justify the delay, though Democrats have disputed the comparison. 
Current status
As of October 20, 2025, the lawsuit had not yet been formally filed, though Attorney General Mayes's office 

Guthrie a Woody..

youtu.be/jKVnur5DkdI?si=ICVcvktDS4ZSlCiC

JohnnyYou » 20 Oct 2025, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Oct 2025, 6:00 pm

Arizona vs. Mike Johnson is not a criminal case but a pending legal dispute regarding the seating of Arizona Congresswoman-elect Adelita Grijalva
. In October 2025, Arizona's Attorney General, Kris Mayes, threatened to sue Speaker of the House Mike Johnson for failing to swear in Grijalva after she won a special election. Mayes followed through on the threat and announced plans to file a lawsuit. 
Case background
The election: Democrat Adelita Grijalva won a special election on September 23, 2025, for Arizona's 7th Congressional District, which was vacated after the death of her father, Rep. Raúl Grijalva.
The delay: Although Arizona's special election results were certified on October 14, 2025, Speaker Johnson refused to swear her in during subsequent "pro forma" sessions, which are brief meetings held while the House is in recess. Instead, Johnson insisted he would only seat her once the House returned to a full legislative session.
The government shutdown: A government shutdown in October 2025 led to an extended House recess, allowing Johnson to delay Grijalva's seating.
The Epstein petition: Grijalva was expected to be the 218th signature on a discharge petition, which would force a House floor vote on a resolution to release records related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. Many Democrats and others alleged the delay was a retaliatory measure by Johnson to prevent this vote. Johnson denied this claim.
Legal pressure: Attorney General Mayes and other Democrats condemned the delay as unconstitutional, arguing that it deprived Arizona of its full representation in Congress. 
Legal brief: State of Arizona vs. Mike Johnson
Parties
Plaintiff: State of Arizona (represented by Attorney General Kris Mayes)
Defendant: Mike Johnson (in his official capacity as Speaker of the House) 
Cause of action
Deprivation of constitutional right to full congressional representation, in violation of the U.S. Constitution. 
Factual allegations
Adelita Grijalva was duly elected to Arizona's 7th Congressional District on September 23, 2025.
The election was formally certified by the state of Arizona on October 14, 2025.

 

Mike Johnson says the time lapse for her installment isn't out of the ordinary...add to the fact that the gubment needs to be open to install...

so tell **** schumer to vote in the CR...
 
 

JohnnyYou » 20 Oct 2025, 6:00 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Oct 2025, 6:00 pm

Arizona vs. Mike Johnson is not a criminal case but a pending legal dispute regarding the seating of Arizona Congresswoman-elect Adelita Grijalva
. In October 2025, Arizona's Attorney General, Kris Mayes, threatened to sue Speaker of the House Mike Johnson for failing to swear in Grijalva after she won a special election. Mayes followed through on the threat and announced plans to file a lawsuit. 
Case background
The election: Democrat Adelita Grijalva won a special election on September 23, 2025, for Arizona's 7th Congressional District, which was vacated after the death of her father, Rep. Raúl Grijalva.
The delay: Although Arizona's special election results were certified on October 14, 2025, Speaker Johnson refused to swear her in during subsequent "pro forma" sessions, which are brief meetings held while the House is in recess. Instead, Johnson insisted he would only seat her once the House returned to a full legislative session.
The government shutdown: A government shutdown in October 2025 led to an extended House recess, allowing Johnson to delay Grijalva's seating.
The Epstein petition: Grijalva was expected to be the 218th signature on a discharge petition, which would force a House floor vote on a resolution to release records related to the Jeffrey Epstein case. Many Democrats and others alleged the delay was a retaliatory measure by Johnson to prevent this vote. Johnson denied this claim.
Legal pressure: Attorney General Mayes and other Democrats condemned the delay as unconstitutional, arguing that it deprived Arizona of its full representation in Congress. 
Legal brief: State of Arizona vs. Mike Johnson
Parties
Plaintiff: State of Arizona (represented by Attorney General Kris Mayes)
Defendant: Mike Johnson (in his official capacity as Speaker of the House) 
Cause of action
Deprivation of constitutional right to full congressional representation, in violation of the U.S. Constitution. 
Factual allegations
Adelita Grijalva was duly elected to Arizona's 7th Congressional District on September 23, 2025.
The election was formally certified by the state of Arizona on October 14, 2025.
Speaker Johnson refused to seat Grijalva, departing from historical precedent of swearing in newly elected members during pro forma sessions.
This delay left Arizona without full representation in the House.
Johnson's stated reasons for the delay—the government shutdown and reliance on a "Pelosi precedent"—are disputed by the plaintiff, who notes that Johnson previously seated other members during similar sessions. ...

Welp, I think it is factual on its face that this inaction by the speaker deprives AZ of its representation, and I predict a win for AZ. 

But that win may be short lived. I predict that the newly minted congress mexican will be picked up in an ICE raid before she can be sworn in on whatever pidgin version of the Bible that mexicans use. 
 
 
 

Cannonpointer » 20 Oct 2025, 9:02 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Oct 2025, 9:02 pm

Welp, I think it is factual on its face that this inaction by the speaker deprives AZ of its representation, and I predict a win for AZ. 

But that win may be short lived. I predict that the newly minted congress mexican will be picked up in an ICE raid before she can be sworn in on whatever pidgin version of the Bible that mexicans use.

Did you read she won her Dad's seat?  But yeah, ICE will deport anybody they want. 

That's  Facism in Action..
 

ROG62 » 20 Oct 2025, 7:09 pm » wrote: ↑

20 Oct 2025, 7:09 pm

Mike Johnson says the time lapse for her installment isn't out of the ordinary...add to the fact that the gubment needs to be open to install...

so tell **** schumer to vote in the CR...

He swore in two Republican  congressmen in seconds to pass the BBB.

Before the elections had been certified..