Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 27 Oct 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 6:02 am

 

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 27 Oct 2025, 6:15 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 6:15 am

viewtopic.php?p=2810005#p2810005

Why is the title in quotation marks?

Blackvegetable » 27 Oct 2025, 6:46 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 6:46 am

Because it confounds illiterates...

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

Blackvegetable » 27 Oct 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 6:02 am

Another Signal scandal? Texts suggest Team Trump eyed 82nd Airborne for Portland

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-sho ... rcna235885

D.C. man sues after being detained for following National Guard around while playing 'Darth Vader's Theme'

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politi ... rcna239492

When ICE came for a U.S. citizen and Army veteran

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... n-citizen/

Remember the time Obama wore a tan suit in the WH?

 

Huey » 27 Oct 2025, 6:57 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 6:57 am

No, I don't remember that about Obama.  I do remember when Obama droned and killed American citizens overseas.  You?

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

MR-7 » 27 Oct 2025, 7:10 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 7:10 am

This story hinges on unverified texts, anonymous sourcing, and speculative intent. Without corroborating evidence—such as message logs, multiple witnesses, or official documentation—it remains a provocative claim, not a proven scandal. No troops, no transcripts, no truth—just Signal noise. BV is desperate.
 
 

 

Huey » 27 Oct 2025, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 7:44 am

It's like the other day when he used a satire cite as a source.

JuCo 5 percenter...72 “Show me the man and I’ll find you the crime” ~ LAVRENTIY BERIA "Try to get past your passionate ignorance and learn to accept what actually happened." ~ brown's unheeded words of wisdom If gender is not sex, why should a gender claim change what sex you shower with? "Libruls are often fascists on vacation..."

Blackvegetable » 27 Oct 2025, 7:40 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 7:40 am

https://youtu.be/2KODZtjOIPg?si=glV87Oq1W03EbctG

Blackvegetable » 27 Oct 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 6:02 am

Another Signal scandal? Texts suggest Team Trump eyed 82nd Airborne for Portland

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-sho ... rcna235885

D.C. man sues after being detained for following National Guard around while playing 'Darth Vader's Theme'

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politi ... rcna239492

When ICE came for a U.S. citizen and Army veteran

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... n-citizen/

Remember the time Obama wore a tan suit in the WH?

Blackvegetable » 27 Oct 2025, 6:02 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 6:02 am

Another Signal scandal? Texts suggest Team Trump eyed 82nd Airborne for Portland

https://www.msnbc.com/rachel-maddow-sho ... rcna235885

D.C. man sues after being detained for following National Guard around while playing 'Darth Vader's Theme'

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/politi ... rcna239492

When ICE came for a U.S. citizen and Army veteran

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... n-citizen/

Remember the time Obama wore a tan suit in the WH?

Let me prove how predictable you narcissists are. Watch this:

1. Phase 1: You will say that you answered it.
Phase 2: I will remind you of :"are these your words?" from yesterday and if "will" is future tense. 
Phase 3: You will deny that I showed you, because of your meltdown with my link provided...and then you will say "I didn't ask for a link."
Repeat

2. Your next move will be to claim that you answered it by giving your definition, to which I replied that isn't the question...etc...etc...blah...blah...blah..

3. You will also say that you answered through your non-answers. 

Moron.

Deal: If Veghead can prove that he answered the survivorship multiple choice question, as the question is written and asked, along with his defense of his answer, then I will agree to never come back for as long as I live. If he cannot, then he is out of here for a month. Additionally, his defense cannot be "Because it fits my definition." That is a claim, not a defense. He is to defend why. 

Exception: I will allow for an exception. If he loses, then I will allow him to stay if he answers it the way it is asked, along with his defense. However, he must do it immediately after the deal has been decided. Not 100 posts later. The very next post of his must be his answer/defense.

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

Vegas » 27 Oct 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 9:48 am

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Deal:

MR-7 » 27 Oct 2025, 6:54 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 6:54 am

No...that's wrong.

chase me

fried
I live rent free in your mind

Huey » 27 Oct 2025, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 7:44 am

It's like the other day when he used a satire cite as a source.

chase me

fried
I live rent free in your mind

Roshambo » 27 Oct 2025, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 10:13 am

You appear to be perplexed.

So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.

BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........

Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.

Vegas » 27 Oct 2025, 9:48 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 9:48 am

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

Predictions:

Deal:

Blackvegetable » 27 Oct 2025, 10:22 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 10:22 am

**** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up. 

Blackvegatble's hypcorisy summed up in one post: [/size]
Blackvegetable » 7 minutes ago » wrote: ↑7 minutes ago
Very simple questions...

From which you are running...

MR-7 » 27 Oct 2025, 10:18 am » wrote: ↑

27 Oct 2025, 10:18 am

Nah.....not at all.   

viewtopic.php?p=2810584#p2810584

MR-7 » 10 Oct 2025, 5:25 pm » wrote: ↑

10 Oct 2025, 5:25 pm

Roshambo, who is currently on your ignore list, made this post.

chase me

fried
I live rent free in your mind