Liberal Forum

Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 1:52 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2025, 1:52 pm

**** you if you think I am going to define that for you.  Like I said, I am not your mother. Look it up.

Copies me again.                           

You prove my point again. And for the last time, it's not asking for a definition. 

God you are such a coward. 

BuckNaked » 28 Oct 2025, 1:50 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2025, 1:50 pm

he ain’t being axed

This is why narcissists avoid questions, but demand answers to theirs. In short, why their rules don't apply to them:

• They use questions to gain control over the interaction: by asking, they keep the spotlight on you rather than revealing themselves, which maintains their power.
• They collect information from others (through questions) while withholding their own responses, so they maintain the upper hand and stay unpredictable.
• They avoid answering because doing so could expose their vulnerabilities or inconsistencies; instead, they preserve a façade of superiority.
• Their behaviour reflects a theme of entitlement and exception: they behave as though ordinary reciprocity (“you ask, I ask”) doesn’t apply to them. This aligns with research showing narcissists tend to expect special treatment and act in exploitative ways. McLean Hospital+2PMC+2
• According to the “status-pursuit in narcissism (SPIN)” model, narcissists are driven by a motive to pursue status through certain processes like situation selection, vigilance, appraisal and response execution. PMC
• Their questioning may also come from a hyper-vigilance to how others behave (especially in terms of dominance), so they use questions to probe for weaknesses or control opportunities rather than open communication. PMC+1

@Blackvegetable  
 

Vegas » 28 Oct 2025, 3:12 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2025, 3:12 pm

Copies me again.                           

You prove my point again. And for the last time, it's not asking for a definition. 

God you are such a coward.

To demonstrate what an *** you are I quote you, verbatim.

 

Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 3:56 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2025, 3:56 pm

To demonstrate what an *** you are I quote you, verbatim.

Yeah ok. I am sure that's it. It couldn't possibly be because you have repeatedly demonstrated that you have no intelligent thoughts of your own. 

Vegas » 28 Oct 2025, 4:06 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2025, 4:06 pm

Yeah ok. I am sure that's it. It couldn't possibly be because you have repeatedly demonstrated that you have no intelligent thoughts of your own.

That's complete ****.

To prove it, I challenge you to post something of yours you consider intelligent. 
 

Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2025, 6:49 pm

That's complete ****.

To prove it, I challenge you to post something of yours you consider intelligent.

Actually, you are fooling yourself, dick head.  You have no intelligent thoughts of your own.  You never Did.  

Blackvegetable » 28 Oct 2025, 6:49 pm » wrote: ↑

28 Oct 2025, 6:49 pm

That's complete ****.

To prove it, I challenge you to post something of yours you consider intelligent.

You first.

Vegas » 29 Oct 2025, 8:50 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 8:50 am

You first.

Your complaint.

Your job, Welshy...




 

****, BV can't and wont define the term woman

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2025, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:02 am

Your complaint.

Your job, Welshy...

What was my claim, welshy?

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2025, 9:02 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:02 am

Your complaint.

Your job, Welshy...

On a different note, how many times can we expect you to pile up that evidence today?

Vegas » 29 Oct 2025, 9:28 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:28 am

What was my claim, welshy?

you have repeatedly demonstrated that you have no intelligent thoughts of your own

In the absence of evidence that you can discern what is intelligent, the exercise would be a waste of time.

Vegas » 29 Oct 2025, 9:29 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:29 am

On a different note, how many times can we expect you to pile up that evidence today?

Until you can define your terms, who the **** knows?
 

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:34 am

Until you can define your terms, who the **** knows?

BV can't and won't define the term woman

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2025, 9:34 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:34 am

Until you can define your terms, who the **** knows?

There are no terms to define you **** moron. 

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:31 am

In the absence of evidence that you can discern what is intelligent, the exercise would be a waste of time.

You have provided no evidence that you can discern what is intelligent.

 

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2025, 9:31 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:31 am

In the absence of evidence that you can discern what is intelligent, the exercise would be a waste of time.

To prove how **** illiterate you are, you still think this is asking for a definition. Which is why you incessantly bring that up in one way or another. 


Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

 

Vegas » 29 Oct 2025, 9:42 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:42 am

You have provided no evidence that you can discern what is intelligent.

You just mimicked me.

me - 10 weeks ahead

https://liberalforum.net/digest.php?t=97397&u=1050


You - too stupid to sweat unsupervised 

Are you seriously starting a thread about us not buying **** coffee from Brazil? You dumb pos.

Vegas » 29 Oct 2025, 9:45 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 9:45 am

To prove how **** illiterate you are, you still think this is asking for a definition. Which is why you incessantly bring that up in one way or another. 

Which scenario is an example of survivorship bias in evaluating business success?

A) Believing that reading business books increases revenue after finding many CEOs recommend them.
B) Concluding that most startups fail after analyzing bankrupt companies.
C) Thinking entrepreneurship is easy because most media profiles focus on successful founders.
D) Surveying customers to understand why they chose your product over competitors

you still think

Stop presuming.

You're a moron, you would have no idea what I think. 

Blackvegetable » 29 Oct 2025, 10:14 am » wrote: ↑

29 Oct 2025, 10:14 am

You just mimicked me.

me - 10 weeks ahead

https://liberalforum.net/digest.php?t=97397&u=1050

You - too stupid to sweat unsupervised

Copies me again. I didn't mimic you. Every day you prove y point. I don't even have to do anything. 

And there wasn't even anything wrong with what I said. I also didn't click the link. You should know that by now.

1. You will continue to pile up evidence for me.